[Part
Two]
These O.T. laws are still theologically
commendable and analogically useful
concerning protection and provision of the
heir. It should be realized that intra and
interracial segregation has served God's
purposes. These godly laws should not be
overlooked or distorted so as to appease what
is thought of as civil rights equality.
"Equal" can not be construed in the
sense of being "fair" if it defrauds or unduly deprives
the descendants of the founders. Nor can
forced mediocrity induce or substitute
liberty--its inherent element of restriction
and suppression defeats its purpose. Only
removing such imposition (such as Affirmative
Action) will allow free enterprise.
Governmental super-imposed legalism derived
from self-serving, defiant, human proposition
can not replace or substitute Biblical and
spiritual principles--it will never work. Old
Testament laws should be honored, understood,
used for guidance, exercised and implemented
as a source for construing our federal and
civil laws concerning provision of the heirs.
(However, as many of us well know, our
chaotic government has mocked God's laws
(O.T. and NT.). It has rejected the virtue
and responsibility of protection and
provision for the heir in the recent
decades.) It is fundamentally necessary and
important to honor the promotion and
inheritance rights of the descendants of
those who established the nation. The
re-instatement of segregation would be more
socially moral and honorable than oppression
of the heir through defiant and aggressive,
anti-Biblical, countermeasures such as
Affirmative Action and enforced
non-segregation.
The Biblical law also warns us from
marriage to an infidel. Naturally, we should
want to marry within our own race. Any woman
of a man's preference should be a believer in
the Lord Jesus Christ and willing to respect
her mate's race [in a mutually protective way
concerning racial homogeneity]. Any of our
own women should be taught to associate
gregariously within only our race, and that
it would be a disgrace to her people if she
wanted to date outside of our race. These
Biblical tenets should apply not only to the
Anglo Saxon race, but there should be similar
tenets among all races. Each race has its own
natural dignity,
and opportunity for Christian dignity through
faith.
However, there is a reservation or
exception to this general rule: Of course natural
preference and power has its part in
life. For instance, an extraordinarily
beautiful woman may attract a man to marry
outside of his race. [However, it must not be
overlooked that homogeneity was established
in Ezra. Concerning the antagonist's argument
that after the Ezran covenant some Jews
married into or descendants of less close
tribes of Semitic
families does not necessarily violate general
racial homogeneity and Semitic genetic
purity.] Nevertheless, the spiritual issue
demands fulfillment before the natural
desire; still, good advice requires that she
should be a Christian (II Cor. 6:14-18).
Similarly, government must fulfill its
required duties (even though it may have many
possible avenues) or else it can not achieve
God's approval, and if it doesn't have God's
approval, then wrath abides upon it.
The Apostle Paul had a godly concern about
his own people, the Israelites (Rom. 9:1-5).
It is a good thing for every person to care
about his own race as well as the rest of the
world. By the way, I want to emphasize that I
am concerned about all peoples and both
genders, and their spiritual welfare; it is
from the love of God which He has given me. I
also realize it is necessary for a Christian
not to be high-minded, but to fear; and to
continue in kindness (Rom. 11:20-22).
However, racial concerns--the
contemplation of advantages and disadvantages
of opposing parties--have been an impediment
to social allegiance. Also, there is a
natural satisfaction experienced among a
contending and disputing less prestigious
group when the downfall of a renowned and
prominent group occurs. The word "discrimination"
has aroused passion among opposing parties
previously and still does today. It is a
minority buzz word. Nevertheless, it should
not have caused animosity, raging and
physical injury among people as in the riots.
Nor should it have threatened our justices to
the point of changing their judgment,
appeasing the riotous and abandoning the
heir. However, that has not been the case.
Politicians and justices were swayed by
rioting, hate speech, dissent and media
coverage to the point they departed from
reasonable prudence and loyal foresight of
administrative order and execution.
From a more profound viewpoint, though
more subtle, I've noticed for years that Jews
and Italians or one of the Islamic nations
while living in this country have always
looked unto their own benefit before the
Anglo Saxon's. Of course, from a
psychological point of view that is natural
because people are naturally selfish, even
though all of their selfishness may not
always be ratified by the government.
However, to the contrary, against the natural
desire and responsibility of government
provision and protection of its heir, the
judicial system has
unnaturally--corruptly--promulgated unnatural
law through imposed special interest, chaotic
confusion, not reason. Even before and
especially now, if Anglo Saxons--the legal
heirs of the nation, look unto their own
benefit, even in the country their ancestors
founded, the USA, the antagonistic word "prejudicism"
or "racism" may pop up. The
words are so powerful that they have become
subversive. Notwithstanding, Biblical
segregation is a commendable good tradition:
please, for the truth's and your own sake, if
not for the sake of others also, don't be
duped, dissuaded or diverted through
calumniating and wresting buzz words!
What do you think the people would say if
you lived in Israel, Italy or Iran and you
demanded economic preferential rights from
them? Or if you imposed your desire to
control busing for their school children?
Regulation and control belongs to the benefit
of the heir--not the non-heir! If such
non-heirs [from any other country than the
USA] are so zealous and faithful about such
promotions, why don't they go to the country
of their nationality and cultivate
legislation there to that effect? But if they
do not want to do that, then they should not
want to overbearingly impose such
exaggeration upon the USA and its heirs. I
hope in the future loyalty to the heir is in
the essence of reversing laws so as to
provide for the descendants of the founders
once again, but even if treachery prevails,
we should not be naive--at least we should
know about the dissenting and treasonous
nature of the ones who perverted and
subverted (changed) our national laws
and caused greater disunity, recognizing that
they bear their guilt. [Those of the races
(or people) mentioned or others who concede
or promote this US inheritance precept
are appreciated.]
There are two types of discrimination:
justifiable discrimination and unjustifiable!
God is the only just one; therefore, His
word, the Holy Bible, is the only authority
concerning justice in all aspects of wisdom
(Pr. 8:15) and philosophy. However, mercy
gifts would be appropriate for the
disadvantaged, not civil laws that increase
the disadvantaged one and deprive the duly
entitled one--a self-interest and
desovereignization scheme not so slight so as
to distort altruism, nor so arrogant as to
totally repress the heir, but dictatorially
efficacious so as to depreciate his
inheritance. When inheritance policy is
philosophically concentric with godly
doctrine in respect to taking care of one's
own first, whether it be a nation, family or
individual, then a civil foundation for
justice may be established.
Many of the heirs in this country are
jobless. Many are dejected from rejection as
to honorable opportunities due to the
Affirmative Action anti-favorable
apportionment against us. Some are homeless.
By the way, at one time from a Biblical
standpoint, slavery existed in a form of
employment by choice--a personal business
adventure (Dt. 15:16, 17); however, even
though slavery does not exist in the USA, at
least by that term today, contrary to their
will, many of the heirs are enslaved to the
residue of opportunities left by the
beneficiaries of Affirmative Action,
and the cruelties of reverse
discrimination. According to Dt.
15:12-18, a brother slave was to be set free
in the seventh year unless he requested to
keep his service. Therefore, the USA should
set the descendants of its founders free and
abolish Affirmative Action--it has been much
more than six years!
(continue)
Scripture
List and other references
demise.html
(Part One)