How Lust Of The Flesh Enslaved
A Once Moral Government Of The People
How Lust Of The Flesh Enslaved
A Once Moral Government Of The People
|
Copyright © 2026 by Kenneth W. Billings No part of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without prior written permission from the copyright owner, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. However, the copyright holder grants permission for readers to share the link to this book's official store page or website with friends and family. Hebrew Scripture Quotations: Hebrew text of the Tanach (Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim) is used with permission from Tanach.us. Source: Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex: UXLC 2.5 (27.6), Tanach.us Inc., West Redding, CT, USA, Apr 2026. English Scripture Quotations: Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations are from the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, public domain. The Holy Bible: King James Version. Electronic ed. of the 1769 edition of the 1761 Authorized Version., Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995. English Transliteration and Translation: English transliterations and translations are the author’s own, unless otherwise cited. LXX and Apocrypha: For the transliteration and translation of the Septuagint and Apocrypha in the Greek text, the author transliterates and translates them himself into English from the: Brenton, L. C. L. The Septuagint Version of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1971 and re-published in 1982. Greek New Testament: For the transliteration and translation of the New Testament in the Greek text, the author transliterates and translates them himself into English from: The Greek New Testament, edited by Matthew Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, which is provided by the Perseus Digital Library at Tufts University. Used with gratitude for their curation of public domain scholarly resources. Disclaimer: This book is provided free of charge. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the author assumes no liability for errors or omissions.
|
This is not a legal document; it is a biblical analysis. “19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” (Gal. 5.19-21)
It is necessary that we backtrack where our people went wrong in order to correct the situation. It is easy to realize how many of our national presidents and politicians lacked spiritual foresight, integrity and diligence so as to bless the descendants of the founders of the Constitution and a once great civilization. Following is a list of the things regarding the detriment, retardation, deterioration, and replacement of white dominion due to cult “Jewish” propaganda and willful, subversive implementation.
The gospel had reached England long before the Magna Carta. From hindsight it seems an Anglo-Jubilean inheritance law in Christian simulation of the Torahian inheritance (Nu. 36:5-13) legal establishment should have been specifically legislated so as not to allow any anti-genealogical, anti-racial, and anti-ethnic or subversive influence destroy the concept of Japhethic affinity and posterity inheritance among homogeneous population.
The Reformation brought about great theological insight. However, through social negligence and the lack of consistently promoted education and aggression against anti-ethnic-homogeneous rule or destructive, public influence, the religious, political and social state of the Northern European races became more vulnerable concerning the viperous so-called “Jew”. Martin Luther and early Christian leaders warned about them, but as many good exhortations are not sufficiently taken heed to, eventually the “Jewish”, a cult and people that are not the same genealogical people of ancient Judaism, gained enough advantages in America, Russia and other countries to mock and subvert Christian influenced governments.
Anti-Christian theology and media pervades America
The “Jewish” attempt to claim they are a people as the ancient people of God. However, this is genealogically fraudulent. God’s people in old times were Hebrews, a people who were under the judgment and command of Nu. 36:5-13. They were genealogical tribes, the “Jewish” are not!
Nu. 36:5-13 was an OT. patrilineal, genealogical judgment and command. It was designed to preserve Hebrew tribes and their inheritance. It was a patrilineal genealogical chain, just the opposite of a matrilineal chain as the modern “Jewish”. For instance, if a Hebrew female from the tribe of Judah broke the judgment and command so as to marry a man from the tribe of Dan, she would belong to the male of Dan's tribe and lose her inheritance in Judah.
However, if a Hebrew female married outside of one of the Hebrew tribes, families who possessed a registered, continuous, patrilineal, genealogical chain, and married a non-Hebrew man, she would lose her inheritance of her former tribe and not have any inheritance in Israel at all. This is what happened to the “Jewish” people after the destruction of the temple (70 AD). The once Hebrew males were taken into slavery or captivity of some form, and the females left off from easily marrying Hebrew men.
Usurpation and fraud of who can come up and live on former Hebrew land: non-Hebrew Israel’s legal improvisation of some kind of religious-maternal identity
As such, it seems eventually there were broken and collapsed, patrilineal chains among many of the remaining people with a more Roman, “Jewish” culture. As centuries passed, seemingly it left the men and their children in a condition wherein they miscegenated and did not keep a register. Eventually, no one had a Hebrew Torah-required, register and there was no use and individual benefit to attempt to preserve the register and patrilineal, Hebrew genealogical inheritance command any longer.
Then, as somewhat Semitic religious hybrids with non-Hebrews, and due to the loss of register and collapse of the continuous, patrilineal chain, and knowingly having lost their Hebrew inheritance, some who wanted to keep their anti-Christian denial of Jesus Christ and his deity, and some of the former Hebrew religion also, formed a matrilineal conversion cult. A millennium and centuries later after the dispersion, Herzl, one of the modern anti-Christian, “Jewish” founders, made his movement which altogether disregarded Hebrew, birth certificate documentation, Nu. 36:5-13, Ezra 2:61-63 and Hebrew prerequisites for tribal identity. A matrilineal law was established by the new nation of Israel in 1950, of course, with no mention of prerequisites of Hebrew register, Nu. 36:5-13 and Ezra 2:61-63. According to Section 4B of the Law of Return (Amendment No. 2) 5730-1970, “For the purposes of this Law, ‘Jew’ means a person who was born of a Jewish mother or has become converted to Judaism and who is not a member of another religion.” (“Law of Return,” § 4B).
You can never legitimately replace the patrilineal, Hebrew genealogical and identity system given by God through Moses (Nu. 36.5-13) with a made-up matrilineal law—it cannot and will never work! Broken genealogical chains and collapsed pedigrees can never be restored regardless of how many Y-DNA tests are taken and how many Hebrew genealogical markers remain. Nevertheless, the Hebrew judgment and commandment of Nu. 36:5-13 was ignored and mockingly, replaced with matrilineal law. So, lacking birth certificates and proof of Hebrew register was not even mentioned and completely ignored—a disqualification in itself to be a tribal member of the Hebrews. Israel became politically occupied with a different religion and people than the ancient Hebrews without much complaint from a world deluded by myth and that does not understand Hebrew tribal identity law.
Learn the Scripture as a defense against myth
The "Jewish" Hebrew Replacement myth can not fool those who know the Scriptures. There are no Hebrews and Jews today. They became extinct. Nu. 36:5-13 is a law no "Jewish" person has the ability to claim, none have legitimate register (Ezra 2:61-63). Their matrilineal law attests to that fact! Herzl Matrilinealists are frauds and have no biblical right to the land. They have no inheritance in the land of Israel. The children of the rejects of the Ezra congregation had closer genealogical chains than the modern "Jewish". Nevertheless, they were separated from the Hebrew people.
Mere Jewish, written Torah circumvention: evasion of the truth and tribal integrity
The Joos, a name that seems more appropriate to me and does not defraud the patrilineal, patriarchs and tribal integrity (Nu. 35.5-13), are very deceptive as to genealogy. As impostors, some misconstrue a reference of Deuteronomy 7:3, 4 as a defense to their lack of patrilineal pedigree and mandated (Ezra 2.61-63) register. However, those verses (Dt. 7.3, 4) are not verses specifically having to do with inheritance: “נַחֲלָה֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Nu. 36.7). I read it in the Hebrew from right to left and then give my transliteration to English from left to right, “na ha la'”.
Required proof of birth and genealogy
A modern, “Jewish” person would have to have birth certificates all the way back to at least 70 AD to claim a Torah-required register. A priest position came through inherited, documented, genealogical inheritance, called a register; it was not a chosen profession as a modern-day rabbi. Since the “Jewish” who claim to be Jews hav2e no birth certificates proving they have no broken and collapsed patrilineal, genealogical chain, lacking proof of Hebrew tribal identity much more so than the sons of Barzillai (Ezra 2. 61-62), they are disqualified as a Hebrew and any of its tribes.
Let's look at the Scripture:
61 And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name: 62 These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood. 63 And the Tirshatha said unto them, that they should not eat of the most holy things, till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim. (Ezra 2:61-63)
Torah-required written documents to live in Israel as a Hebrew
The children of Habaiah could not qualify as members of the tribe of Levi and continuous, descendants from Aaron.
אֵ֗לֶּה בִּקְשׁ֧וּ כְתָבָ֛ם הַמִּתְיַחְשִׂ֖ים וְלֹ֣א נִמְצָ֑אוּ וַֽיְגֹאֲל֖וּ מִן־הַכְּהֻנָּֽה׃ (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2:62)
The children of Habaiah were related to Barzillai, who had evidently changed his name (v. 61). They were rejected without a registered birth certificate so to speak, and could not fulfill the Torah-required register. There was no conflict about a former connection and relationship with the priesthood, the conflict came because the men who were sons of Habaiah and under genealogical observation could not prove their genealogical lineage with written documents.
“Their writing of those enrolling” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2:62), my paraphrastic translation of “כְתָבָ֛ם הַמִּתְיַחְשִׂ֖ים” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2:62), was not found, “וְלֹ֣א נִמְצָ֑אוּ” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2:62). Without the documents, rejection until further notice was the outcome. They were considered polluted and put away from the priesthood.
So, it is the same way with the modern “Jewish”, who have no written, continuous birth record proof—they are as polluted people. They would have to prove by written documents, birth certificates, all the way back to at least 70 AD, that they have no broken genealogical chain. Their word can’t be taken anymore than the children of Habaiah. Their mannerisms and meticulous attempts to keep the Sabbath cannot prove it, continuous, written documents are necessary. So, theologically very important, the true test is not DNA, it is proper accounting with a set of continuous, written documents that prove Hebrew patrilineal inheritance (Nu. 36.5-13, Ezra 2:61-63). By the way, no one in the world today has legitimate, Hebrew register. God forbid the “Jewish” should claim they have found a person of any tribe let alone a legitimate priest (cohen)!
The rejection of those related to Barzillai was within a generation or so due to being without Hebrew, birth certificate documentation, but the rejection of those who claim Hebrew identity today would amount to lack of documentation for around a hundred of generations since at 70 AD. At the time of Barzillai there were Hebrews who knew him but would not accept him due to his lack of required documentation. There are no Hebrews to determine whether others are Hebrew today (Ezra 2:63); how much more would the identification officials have denied those with generation gaps as those of the modern, tribal impostors of today!
Modern Jewish false-heir culture: defying the absolutely required male, patrilineal genealogy as Ezra (Ezra 7.1-5) and Hebrew inheritance law (Nu. 36.5-13; Ezra 10.3; Dt. 4.2; Ezra 2.61-62; Ruth 4.18-22)
What tribe did converts Sammy Davis, Jr., Marilyn Monroe, Connie Chung and Liz Taylor think they joined? Or former, Polish descended Benjamin Mileikowsky, now Netanyahu. Previously, even in the 1800's, men proposing themselves as leaders to Zion so to speak, convinced many that the Gentile-Jewish (not putting it that way, of course) should have a land in Israel rather than Africa. England, having a Rothschild financial connection, and still having a great influence after WW I, gave the genealogical, biological and theological impostors a path to their end-goal with the Balfour Declaration. How this works out is up to God, but we Christians must realize the blatant, political, genealogical and non-tribal discrepancy.
Christians are God’s chosen: the Israel of God (Gal. 6.15-16)
We must keep in mind that the real Israel is the brotherhood of Christians, God's chosen and eternal people (Gal. 6.16). We must also keep in mind that the Hebrew Christian converts at the time of Christ were a different genealogical and consequential biological people than the deceivingly proposed modern “Jew”. We, as Christians, do not attempt to impose that we are genealogically Hebrew. Never! We continue to proclaim the faith of the believing Hebrews at the time of Christ.
Deception of a made-up religion
Sammy Davis, Jr., Marilyn Monroe and Connie Chung claimed to be “Jewish” but genealogically (Nu. 36:5-13) were definitely not people known for having been formerly attached to God as those mentioned, “And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel… ”, עַל־עַמִּ֣י (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38: 16); which I transliterate as “al ammi” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38: 16) and translate as “my people” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38.16). The people of God were genealogically (having patrilineal, genealogical, tribal distinction, not a mere drop of Semitic blood) and consequentially genetically Hebrew, continuous, patrilineal descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The Ezran Covenant protected the Hebrew tribal inheritance and priesthood. Herzl Matrilinealists cannot patrilineally, genealogically and genetically equate themselves to the Hebrew race and subraces. The rejected women and children at the Ezran Congregation failed the genealogical requirement. Neither can those of the “Jews For Jesus” organization or other modern converts to Christianity honestly declare themselves to be Hebrews and Jews. Even the religious elite in America and Israel don't have the continuous, patrilineal genealogy and consequential biology, or theology (continuous, patrilineal lineage with documentation: Numbers 36:5-13, Ezra 2:61-63) to be a former people, “my people” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38.16), of God. Remember, if the sons of Barzillai with a lineage very close to the Hebrews could not qualify as Hebrew without register, none of the very distant, modern “Jewish” can. How much more the “Jewish” impostors’ word is not any more qualifying than that of the sons of Barzillai.
Myth, deception and cult influence upon the church
The rationalization of church finance doctrine made non-“Jewish” Gentiles prone to subservience. Many Christians are suffering from biblical pseudo-intellectualism and not understanding the Hebrew prescription (Nu. 36.5-13) for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and anti-genocide law. The Joos, a name I use that does not defraud the patriarchs and their genealogy, are not a genealogical sub-race as the English, Germans, Italians, Nigerians, Egyptians and other genealogical and genetic sub-racial peoples; they are a religious culture and an artificial one at that, covering the spectrum of the three basic races and mixtures (actually defying Hebrew law and genealogical religion): Japhethic (white), Hamitic (black) and Semitic (reddish or earthly type).
Actually, the Joos are “Jewish” Gentiles. (Luke 21:24) Our media is bought and owned by the anti-Christian elite, so the pseudo-intellectualism taught at Ivy League schools and upside-downism is pushed by the Jooish lobbies.
However, it is slanderous toward the patriarchs to equate the Joos (Herzl Matrilinealists) with the ancient Jews, two different, genealogical and genetic peoples (Nu. 36.5-13). Many have been seduced by the absence of continuous-patrilineal genealogy and false ideology of Herzl Matrilinealism. “Zion revisionism” and an eschatological, “modern return” myth of Herzl Matrilinealists, part of the apostasy we are suffering, has been taught instead of the eschatological, return of the Hebrew, found, lost ten tribes who followed the Lord 2,000 years ago or so. All the Hebrew tribes were united in Christ (James 1.1). Hebrew and Gentile Christians began to overcome nations and political persecution as the servants of God spread Christianity and the gospel. The world began to bloom.
Before the NT
The Maccabees were a great family. They lived before the New Covenant and the coming of Jesus Christ. They were zealous and inspiring men who led others of their people to fight and overcome men against God, very different from the impostors and alternative-Jewish people today, who actually mock covenants and fight against the people of God (Christians) and their racial integrity. The Maccabees honored Hebrew law and that includes continuous, patrilineal inheritance (Nu. 36.5-13; Ezra 10.3; Dt. 4.2; Ezra 2.61-62; Ruth 4.18-22).
Cult disregard of genealogical, intra-tribal race
Regardless of dominant sub-race of other people, the “Jewish”, perhaps over a millennia without a concern for Nu. 36:5-13, which they have nothing to do with, do like to inter-marry white people, especially the more prosperous and intelligent ones. The Rothschild's themselves are racial self-haters so as to condone inter-tribal breeding of their modern religion even though they are generally Japhethic (white). The Joos are matrilinealists and conversionists, that in its self proves they are not the same genealogical and genetic people as the Hebrews. They are marching toward an artificial Zionism and even fraud of God's real estate, the land of Israel.
Conversionists
Sammy Davis, Jr. and Elizabeth Taylor may have been different sub-races but their Jooish-Hellywood sub-race-defying culture was the same. As I mentioned before, the Jooish are not a sub-race so they lack biblical, genealogical discernment and like to marry those who do and do not belong to a genealogical sub-race also. All they may need is to convert the spouse to a Joo is a conversion ceremony. Sadly, many in our poor churches may think, “Wow, a person of the ancient tribes!” However, the Japhethic, Hamitic or Semitic victim of the Jooish marriage may regret the loss of genealogical purity among posterity if he or she is not careful. Racial and cultural background checks are wise.
The matrilineal law of the Herzlists (modern “Jewish”) cannot duplicate patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13) nor the principal of the kinsman redeemer, which adhered to patrilineal law. Notice the Torah scribe (Ruth 4.18-22) looked out for us that we would not be deceived by a cult-invention, for instance, matrilineal law. The Herzlist women don't have patrilineal inheritance as Naomi. Nevertheless, Ruth received great grace through Boaz because she was not accepted by her kinsman redeemer who had first choice (Ruth 4.6) because of her progeny and being a Moabitic woman. Suffering worse consequences, the non-Hebrew women of Ezra 10 were totally rejected and put away (amicable expulsion) by the Hebrews.
No biblical inheritance in Israel among the Joos
Today, modern Israel is occupied by the “Jewish”, a non-Hebrew people, who have less credentials than the rejected of Ezra. They have no genealogical, hence genetic and biological, inheritance, and their religious culture (matrilineal succession) is in direct opposition to patrilineal law of God and Moses (Nu. 36.5-13), the covenant (Ezra 10.3) and the kinsman redeemer law. The Jewish can defraud, make themselves a cult and spread myth, but they can't make themselves Hebrews/Jews.
Some may openly hate you if you expose their vice and fraud. I was conversing with an ill woman who proclaimed to be Jewish in the comment section of a video on the Internet. She reviled me: “YOU SPEAK AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST!” She said, “Stay in the dark and in bondage to Idolatry, your sin, your choice.” She blasphemed Christianity: “Rabbi shines the Light of Gd and His Holy Eternal Torah, Saul/Paul the Con Man of Tarsus/all things to all men taught against Gd and His Holy Eternal Torah. Christianity is Pure Pagan Idolatry, it is the LAST BEAST!” She spoke evil of the birth of Jesus Christ and many other things: “Remember, it can't be her husband Joseph, for according to the Greek Tall Tales, Joseph wanted to DIVORCE Mary after finding out she was Pregnant. So that means IF Jesus existed, he was born on the wrong side of the blanket, a mamzer which would account for the chip on his shoulder and his rebellious spirit that caused his family to believe he had gone Insane and for Roman Authorities to convict and crucify him for the crime of sedition.” Her blasphemy was so wicked that I retracted a mentioned prayer for God to help her. I could not pray for her.
Myth, made-up religion and lack of required-genealogy
Biblical genealogy and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ does not matter to them, matrilineal culture and anti-Christianity does (“Law of Return,” § 4B). Without a matrilineal, progenitive culture, which they made up in opposition (Dt. 4:2) to the Hebrew, Torah-required, patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13), they could not even be a people from the conglomeration of global, cultural (not racial) Jesus Christ-denying ethnicity they are.
A different people than the Hebrews
The Joos are not a genealogical race and they deviate from Hebrew law as to inheritance (Numbers 36.5-13). Even though some of them may have Semitic DNA, they are mere Gentiles, being considered no more Hebrew than the rejects of Ezra 10, and as the sons of Barzillai (Ezra 2.61-62) without possibility of ever having documented proof. Due to evading Hebrew genealogical law and trying to replace it in many other ways they think they can, they aren't genuine and experts at Biblical law and fulfillment; however, they may know the Hebrew language. Nevertheless, that does not and can never make them Hebrew. Also, cult circumcision can make a person lose weight and flesh, but it can't make him a Hebrew. Logically, if they are not Hebrews, they are Gentiles (see Luke 21:24). These Talmudic heretics (but still Gentiles!) are very skilled at deviating and attempting to make the Old Testament void of a God-only-begotten Christ and a messiah with patrilineal lineage (Mt. 1:16, Luke 3:23), the messiah that fulfilled Dt. 18:15-19. Don't let them deceive you.
For the Christian Northern European descendant: Beware of interest sting
Land is a material basis for autonomy. An important lesson to learn from the now extinct, unbelieving and failing Hebrews of 70 AD is that God ran them out of their given land because of their lack of faith and disobedience to him, especially concerning the messiah (Dt. 18.15-19). Hence, considering their rebellion, wandering, miscegenation, misery and suffering, and failure to repent, no non-Jooish Gentile should ever have wanted to let a descendant of such a dispersed person or disingenuous proselyte, especially the more heretical, manage his affairs. However, gullibility and indifference to this wisdom and hindsight has been one of America's greatest and fatal errors.
The lie of mongrelism and anti-Shemitism
(modern-Talmud integration and miscegenation distortion: racial heresy)
Today, it is impossible for a whole-race person let alone a mixed-race person to be a real Jew: Hebrew patrilineal succession and register is required (Ezra 2:61-63). This phenomenon also makes the term "Judeo-Christianity" disgraceful and incoherent in the sense of pseudo-biological pretense and mongrelism.
This racial heresy is contrary to Ezran Judaism, which required continuous, Hebrew patrilineal bloodline progeny. Even as much as half-breeds were deported from the Ezran congregation. The rule is seed of an Israeli father and mother according to Berith (covenant) and Torah (law), no mixing with people of other demographic-genetics (Ne. 10.30). Racial and cultural homogeneity is the standard of old and today.
However, the rule against polluted seed has been molested and covered up to a further extent by modern-Talmud Judaism, which has propagated mongrelism and numbers of cult adherents rather than integrity to God and commandment.
Let me illustrate this:
Non-Jacobean biological groups or hybrid generations actually can not qualify regardless of haplotype, Y-DNA and mtDNA testing— it only took one occurrence of miscegenation (Ezra 2:61-62) to disqualify seed (mixed or partial descendants) from Ezran Israel.
It doesn't take a geneticist to realize skin color may be used for basic discernment among many racial groups and it sometimes does at least show the effect of recent lineage. For example, look at the dark Negro, and on the other end of the spectrum, the light White: both generally give evidence of recent non-racial-miscegenation. The exception to this would be recombined recessive alleles, which would give evidence of non-purity and mixed blood (manifestation of inter-racial genetics). To further clarify by a basic example, if you ever saw a mulatto child from a dark Negro and a light White, in many cases you can tell it does not look totally like either of its parents!
Racial traits and likenesses
Therefore, I believe you can consider it almost sure that if you meet two people in a group with mere, blatant skin color differences, and especially with variant bone structures, who claim to be full, biological Israelites, mother and father from the same lineage as those accepted at the Ezra congregation (Ezra 10), a true parental and matrilineal, genealogical descendant from Jacob without a broken pedigree, you can mark at least one out as a liar. Children of a pure biological background identify their parents through their inherited genealogical-genetic traits or likenesses, not differences.
However, among such a religiously pompous group, if none honestly claims to be a true, full-blooded, biological Israelite but claims to be a Jew without the required patrilineal pedigree (Nu. 36.5-13) and register (Ezra 2.61-63), such is a fraudulent, pretentious hypocrite, who insults the racial integrity of patriarchal Israel, makes void the law, disregards the covenant, and defames the name "Jew" and the patriarchs. Let such a one call himself a Joo or something else, noting a different bloodline and religion of that of the holy, written Torah.
Example
Now, suppose, using hypothetical imagination, back in Ezran times, after the strange women and their half-breed children had been deported from the congregation of Israel, that there was a woman by the name of Miss Deportee. Miss Deportee had righteously been divorced from a man of the congregation of Ezra because she was not an Israeli biological descendant (Hebrew), nor could she claim mother-in-law, deceased son kinsman redeemer rights (Ruth 1.1-5). Therefore she left Israel with a half-breed child.
Now, the child was a female and grew up. She traveled part of the world and met Harry Hongt, whom she married in China. They had a female child. This child grew up and married another (technically speaking) mongrel, named Ariel Deceivi (from an unknown genealogical-biological lineage), who was taught in a heretical (which also would have been ironic at that time), modern-Talmud school (Alternative Jewism) for partial, Jewish advocates and anti-Shemites (non-full Semitic people). Well, as time passed they had children and Ariel claimed his family was “Jewish” to people of different lands although he could not have snowed the Ezran congregation in Israel since it was only a few generations past the established covenant for homogeneity and restoration of the law. (Ezra 10.3)
Now, let's look at the situation from a biblical perspective. In part Ariel would have been rhetorically correct in saying the family was “Jewish” because of the partial Israeli genetic factor through the lineage of the mixed-Israeli child of Miss Deportee, his wife's ancestor. However, he could not say his family was Hebrew. In terms of integrity of Berith and Torah (covenant—Ezra 10, and law—Nu. 36:5-13), that would have been mere deception.
If the child of Miss Deportee could not have been accepted among the congregation of Israel at the institution of Berith (covenant), then it would be impossible for her descendants to be able to obtain the necessary genealogical-biological credentials and written documents (Ezra 2:61-63) which would have prevented her discrimination and deportation in the first place. Therefore, the family of Ariel would have been no more acceptable to the congregation of Israel than the daughter of Miss Deportee, a partially-Israeli ancestor who was considered a non-Hebrew and other-tribe/race mongrel (not capable of inheritance in Israel) deported with her mother.
Thus, similarly, contemporarily we see the results of the lack-of-continuous-genealogy lie of promoted mongrelism and erring religion (cult) of modern-Talmud Judaism/Joodaism today, not the Ezran, patrilineal, genealogical-genetic Judaism of the Bible. Not the documented, genealogical (Ezra 2:61-62) evidence of a Hebrew. False Jewism, in its many various forms, even other than mongrelism, surrounds us everywhere we go. Anti-Christianity among Semitic, Hamitic and Japhethic subraces and mixtures is enveloping our world. To the grief of the righteous, it has had profound and detrimental, intra- and international influence among the naive nations, and even Israel itself.
Summary, anti-Christians and myth-believers have great numbers
So, concluding, whole-race non-documentation, mongrelism and modern-Talmudicism go hand and hand, but are in rebellion against God contrarily to Berith and Torah. It is part of the “Jewish” Hebrew-replacement theology myth.
Credit slaves and duped Japhethic nations
A major event concerning the demise of the USA began with insider special-interest-rule and the Federal Reserve Bank. The biblical principles of land and people, land in tribal perpetuity, and non-usury against a member of the nation were deliberately perverted for the advantage of the national enemies.
The religious doctrine of land and people
In ancient days, Israel was a unique, genealogical group and a nation. However, the re-establishment of the nation of Israel has been perverted with “Jewish” Hebrew-replacement theology and myth. Biblically, the nation of Israel cannot lawfully accept biological impostors (non-documented whole-race persons and pariah-mongrels) as heirs of the patriarchs: Torah. Actually, their citizens are genealogically and biologically outcast status according to Ezran deportation identification methods and righteousness, and there are no known Hebrews in the land of modern Israel today.
Parasitic, anti-Christian greater Israel policy among Japhethic nations
Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy and register, and the children of the occupiers of the land are no more genealogically eligible than those that were accounted “… as polluted, put from the priesthood” at the time of Ezra. (Ezra 2.62). According to my paraphrastic translation, such were deposed due to desecration: “יְגֹאֲל֖וּ” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62), which according to my understanding is transliterated, “yegoahl'u”. The modern impostors cannot produce a Hebrew messiah, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession (Matthew 1.1-17). The made-up matrilineal law of the “Jewish” can’t suffice and is 180 degrees from the required patrilineal law of Nu. 36:5-13.
Ante-WW II Germany attempted racially homogeneous (although not specifically in the patrilineal sense) doctrine of its own people, but the Internationalist-misled world in its ignorance and passivity fought against Christian favor, prosperity and the concept of racial purity development. It seems they were led by the anti-Christian, greater Israel policy even then, to intrude, divide, pollute, kill and overcome those who attempted genealogical purity, the posterity-and-demographic conscious, moral ones of the Japhethic and non-“Jewish” peoples. Now, the descendants of Northern Europe, wherever they may be, are struggling to enjoy even a part of their lost sovereignty and to keep their progeny un-polluted (deposed due to desecration) from other races.
Samaritan woman at the well: genetic differentiation between Hebrew and non-Hebrew
Genealogy: According to verse 9 of John 4, we see that the Jews did not associate with the Samaritans, who before the Assyrian conquest the people that lived in their land were part of the northern kingdom (ten tribes) of Israel. This justified separation was probably because of genealogical, genetic and theological differences due to the Samaritans had been previously under the treacherous hegemony of Assyria and later the Romans. Many may have miscegenated.
All of the Hebrew tribes had been under threat but God spared a remnant. This is evident when Jesus went through Nephthalim: At the time of Matthew there were Hebrew people who had patrilineal inheritance in Israel (Numbers 36:5-13), in Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim. James 1:1 proves that there were twelve Hebrew tribes united in faith after the time of Jesus Christ also. Even though there had been a former carrying-away by Assyria, all the faithful of the Hebrew tribes in Jesus the Christ were brought together through the light of Jesus Christ. This is the essence of the 144,000.
Modern Samaritans and “Jewish” fail the Hebrew required, genealogical test: lost register
Perhaps it is possible that some Samaritans who were descendants of the ten tribes at the time of Jesus may not had lost Hebrew patrilineal descendancy and proof of register although they were associated with the Assyrians, who conquered and displaced the territory. However, today, no one has necessary, register and evidently did not and was not able to retain it proving consecutive, Hebrew lineage. Many speak Arabic; and Islam, which had hegemony over the people for several centuries, does not follow patrilineal law as the Hebrews did.
Matrilinealism and fake-Jew return eschatology
Nevertheless, the modern “Jewish” do not have patrilineal descendancy either, and lack of necessary and required, register denies them inheritance also in Israel (Nu. 36.5-13). Logically, there can be no modern return of the Hebrews to Israel as the erring eschatological teachers imply. The return of the twelve tribes was at the time of Jesus (James 1.1) and after a great testimony and proliferation of Christians, they are genealogically extinct now.
The return and twelve tribe re-establishment was after the time of Christ. Christians, who believe in the usurpation of Israel by the Herzl Matrilinealists as a worthy Hebrew-return event have been misled with myth and fake-Jew return eschatology. Some of the Matrilinealists and proselytes may have never even had an ancestor who set foot in Israel. Even if they did, none have followed continuous, patrilineal genealogical law (Nu. 36.5-13) and retained the required register (Ezra 2.61-62).
Theology: Samaritan woman
In verse 15 she asks for the water that she will not thirst after and Jesus begins in verses 16-18 to give her that living water that springs up by correcting her sexual immorality (Jn. 4). He reveals to her that the man she is living with is not her husband, and gives her a brief history of her former marriages but not in depth.
Samaritans did not worship the true God because they did not know what they worship (Jn. 4.22). However, she did expect the messiah to come (Jn. 4.25). She learned that Jesus was the Christ and told her people of her experience. They came to see for themselves. (Jn. 4.26-30)
Marriage after death or divorce
Many wonder about the woman's situation: Was she formerly morally married under the biblical law at that time. It seems she was because Jesus said that she has had five husbands (v. 18). A woman was permitted to marry another man if her husband died. She was also permitted according to Dt. 24:1-3 to remarry if she had a written divorce contract.
However, the issue of her immorality is not with the former husbands but with the man that she is not married to (v. 18). The relationship the woman had with the man is mysterious. Was she living in fornication or adultery? It is not directly specified.
Adultery
If it was an adulterous relationship, her last husband would have been alive at the time of her immorality. Today, many seem to disregard the NT and still go by the OT. remarriage law, which Christians consider as adultery. Compare Liz Taylor (who claimed to be a virgin at the time of her first marriage) with at least seven or so legal but not sanctified marriages afterward.
Fornication
If it was a relationship of fornication (I Corinthians 7.2), the Samaritan woman’s last husband would have to have passed or he had given her a written contract of divorce (Dt. 24.1-3). However, it is doubtful that is the latter case because Jesus did not recognize Dt. 24:1-3 in Mt. 19:9. Whatever the case may be, she did not lawfully marry the man she was living with. What if the Samaritan woman had sex with other men after the five husbands and then shacked up with the last man. Compare our many fallen women of America while knowingly being unchaste marrying and defiling other men.
Victim or willing participant
We don't know her life history after her notifying her community she met the messiah. If the Samaritan woman at the well had been sexually abused after the five husbands, she did nothing about it evidently before she met Jesus. That would have been her error and responsibility to correct it. Nevertheless, she was awakened to her circumstances and lack of fulfillment. One step out of immorality and into spiritual advancement and morality would have been a confession and admission to break up with her current man. She did not go that far to do that up to the end of the conversation.
The righteous are different than the sinful because they confess and repent from their error. A victim doesn't have to continue in sin unless she chooses to. Many abused women in our time need to reach beyond the status of what we know about the Samaritan woman, learn and specifically admit their wrong and bring the end of immorality with works following: abstinence of men.
Summary
Jesus told the Samaritan woman that the man she was living with was not her husband. He brought her to the living water through pointing out her immorality. She had drank water before, but it was not water that opened her mind to spiritual things she needed to change. She needed the word of God. After a brief conversation with him, she acknowledged (Jn. 4.19) that Jesus knew she was living in sin.
Regardless, Jesus Christ brought in the new covenant, and remarriage (now adultery in NT times) nor fornication (1 Corinthians 7.2) were permitted according to the message to the deacons (1 Timothy 3.12) and teachings of the church hierarchy. However, for a woman to have a clean conscience and live righteously, she was obligated to repent of her contemporary adultery or fornication and live single. Repentance and living single is a resolve for adultery or fornication. God can give living water and salvation, but for a sinner to repent of her adultery or fornication she must make the personal change of determining to live single. That is reasonable for anyone wanting to live for God and not allow the lusts of the flesh (Gal. 5.19) to be more important than living single for God.
So, to live single may legally require an illegitimate marriage to be righteously dissolved through annulment, a form of divorce (Mt. 19.9). Under all circumstances, living with the former bed-partner would not be acceptable.
Land in tribal perpetuity: the basis for existence and inheritance of particular tribes (Nu. 36.5-13)
Intra-tribal economy: the value standard is directly related to the produce and expenses of the land. The reason our people have been displaced and dispossessed in the USA is because our religious and political leaders failed to promote biblical finance principles.
First, through perpetual inheritance laws, even as Israel and Moses (through God's command) made laws for its Semitic tribes, if our country had legally disallowed our American Northern European (non-Semitic, but favored through the New Covenant) tribes from being displaced and our land from being sold to non-assimilating foreigners, we would not be in such a predicament: border-crossers would not have been able to buy our land and displace us. Moses never tolerated Israel to sell their land to foreigners.
Second, they should have also legally prevented interest-earning, usury-based finance (especially disallowing the institution of non-Northern-European and foreign organizations such as the Federal Reserve Bank). Since land would have had to be purchased only among our own Japhethic people and by other means than interest-paying credit, we would have been able to favorably manage the properties and institutions, and to restrict the control of real assets of the country in our hands.
Christian jubilean finance system: land held perpetually for heirs
A self-preserving financial system and techniques of providing for our people's schooling and living needs could have been introduced without diminishing our prosperity and posterity. Now we hardly can own and enjoy anything without intrusion from peoples of other lands. It is not likely that we have the collective racial discipline to turn things around. Deterioration gets worse and worse as the decades and now, multi-democracy go by.
American lawlessness has further protruded to destroy the divine rights as to the family social structure once permitted in this country. Intra-tribal (intra-racial) and inter-tribal (inter-racial) laws and ethics as to providing for one's family and posterity are required to preserve a people from financial and moral devastation; this can be seen through the commandments of Moses: these laws and commandments (Nu. 36.5-13) protected the inheritance of the people of Israel. From this, it can be deduced that a righteous nation should protect the inheritance of its people even to the extent of intra-tribal segregation. Intra-tribal laws are small parts or building blocks of the larger set of laws, or tribal laws, of the Bible.
On the other hand, contrary to tribal laws and ethics, are the other-tribal influences, or Philistine antagonism. In contrast to tribal segregation, see Ne. 10:30 concerning laws with other tribes, peoples of different, patrilineal genealogy, biology and culture. Our nation has been subverted and lost its longing for insight from the Old Testament books as a guideline.
We are paying a tremendous price for passivity. Our lack of knowledge of God's things and dignity has given our enemies an opportunity to corrupt and pervert us. Many of our women have been devastated. We have been continually insulted and deprived through desovereignization tactics. Now, the non-white and Philistine-inclined races are taking advantage of the heirs of the founders of the USA in economic, social, and basic fundamental rights as to inheritance. Our Japhethic constituents have not collectively guarded the oil in their lamps.
Anti-church finance schemes (usury) should not have been tolerated to creep into our government
Interest and usury (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.20) are basically the same thing. The word “interest” or “usury” is interchangeable in these particular verses, it is the word “נֶ֥שֶׁךְ” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.20), which I transliterate, “ne'ysheyk” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.20) and sounds like (in what I presume a more phonetic form) “na'y shayk” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.20). The Psalmist commends, “Lord, who may dwell in your sanctuary? Who may live on your holy hill? He... who lends his money without usury.... will never be shaken” (Ps. 15.1-5). My Oxford dictionary defines “usury” as:
“1. The fact or practice of lending money at interest; esp. in later use, the practice of charging excessive or illegal rates of interest for money on a loan.
2. Premium or interest on money (or goods) lent.” (Usury)
Inter-Christian-group credit allowed, but no interest-paying
(1) this charge (interest) should be excluded in loans to Christians;
(2) and Christians should resist and reject loan temptations from non-Christian individuals and institutions;
(3) and even if the case may be that both parties are Christians and only Christians, the loan should be without interest and not extend beyond a period of seven years.
Interest-earning as an advantage to God's people (OT. view)
Long ago, in BC times, before the luxurious and holy kingdom of our glorious King David was established, God had given land and inheritance laws, among financial and other beneficial rules, to his followers.
No-interest-earning: the rule for today (NT view)/New Covenant changes upon finance
Formerly, it was not dishonorable gain for a Jew to charge a Gentile interest on a loan: At that time the Jews were God's chosen and favored people. However, the believing and obedient Gentiles were given an entrance into the New Covenant as God's chosen and favored people when Jesus Christ, the Son of God, made a sacrifice by his death for all men. These OT. laws, and NT changes along with the acknowledgment of believing Gentiles as God's people, were remembered by pious, church leaders and the reverent Gentiles.
Christians are under grace, not under the law. The Scriptures had to be fulfilled concerning the new covenant that God said he shall make with his people: “Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:” (Je. 31.31). And also: “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.” (Jn. 4.24).
This new covenant was brought into effect and established by Jesus. The new covenant is better than the old one—fulfilling the Old Testament laws rather than destroying them. See my free book “Nature, Theology, Law, Prophets And Fulfillment”. New covenant teachings repeal some OT. laws and practices, and extend others, for instance: Sacrifices and gifts were perfected by the sacrifice of Jesus obtaining eternal redemption for us (Heb. 9.10-12); turning the other cheek (active piety by means of non-retaliation, not passivity) rather than “a tooth for a tooth" (Mt. 5.38); cf. Ex. 21:24; allowing all meat to be eaten (including pork) rather than only specified meat (Acts 10.11); cf. 1 Tim. 4:5, Lv. 11:7, and 2 Maccabees 6:18; also note the glorious virtue to abide within the OT. covenant regulations at the cost of their lives (King James Version Apocrypha, 2 Maccabees 6.18-7.42); the Jews are no longer required to keep feast days and celebrations (Col. 2.16); cf. Ps. 81:3-5, Ne. 10:32-33; circumcision of the flesh is no longer required (Acts 15.9); cf. Gen. 17:10, Acts 15:1; etc.
New covenant financial changes
The prophecy-fulfilling, new covenant resulted in a great change in financial aspects toward Gentiles. The contrasting works of love of the Gentiles with the works of evil of the hateful Jews were proof that God had spread his favor among the nations. To the loss of the later greedy, disbelieving and corrupt “Jewish”, who did not accept God's OT. genealogical laws (Nu. 36.5-13) and made up their own religion, nor did they abide by the new covenant and the faithful Gentiles as God's people, Christians were warned not to allow the former Jews, who became extinct, and anyone else to take advantage of them through interest-earning any longer. Church officials were expected to live exemplary lives. The Council of Nicaea, Canon # 17 (First Council of Nicaea) called for the revocation of an office of a church official if he made any money “dishonorable gain”—gains upon interest, no matter how slight.
Capital must protect race and culture
I personally believe money can be used for investment profitably without interest-earning. However, some of the profit of investment must be re-invested into business to keep it prosperous and not lose according to inflation. Growth can be achieved without dishonorable gain.
Capitalism and democracy cannot work hand-in-hand for the abiding people (race) without restrictions for those of a different race and emigrants from other areas. The Henry Ford, Sr. experience has proven this. America has become a tyrannical, anti-democracy through the subversion of the Internationalists. Our politicians, not only our former land and other possessions, are bought and owned by our subverters.
Capitalism is not Christian husbandry
Sure, capitalism is generally better than communism, but both tend to be ruled by the unGodly elite. Both sides promote an economic system for its particular group or subset of people. However, Christian husbandry is a biblical, group way of establishing economics. It is guarded by the laws of Moses (Torah) and advanced by the changes of the NT, which prevent tyranny or the unGodly from ruling over the particular group. The only way unGodliness can overtake Christian husbandry is through the perversion of the group or followers of Christianity. We live in a conglomeration of collective, economic lawlessness and anti-husbandry today. Our world is headed for global tyranny!
Throughout the early centuries the problem of dishonorable gain and interest-earning was dealt with a strong hand by order of church authority, and the people prospered by the church being on target with the Scriptures and this obedience. Although it has been said that Calvin rationalized the no-interest-earning virtue, which I can’t verify and haven’t scrutinized, nevertheless, Martin Luther theologically and politically continued in direct financial faithfulness as to not protecting anti-Christianity and the economic endeavors of the “Jewish” (even though as far as I know, he did not understand and distinguish and express the lack of genealogical register of impostors).
However, this quote below is not hard to find on the Internet, but it may be difficult to find without a “Jewish” apologetic comment and an “anti-Semitic” reference. The dinosaur media, so to speak, manipulates information unfavorably when “Jewish” exposure is performed. If you let context be king, you can see the intention of Luther warning the public against the financial domination of an anti-Christian group.
“Fifth, I advise that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside, since they are not lords, officials, tradesmen, or the like. Let them stay at home. I have heard it said that a rich Jew is now traveling across the country with twelve horses his ambition is to become a Kokhba devouring princes, lords, lands, and people with his usury, so that the great lords view it with jealous eyes. If you great lords and princes will not forbid such usurers the highway legally, some day a troop may gather against them, having learned from this booklet the true nature of the Jews and how one should deal with them and not protect their activities. For you, too, must not and cannot protect them unless you wish to become participants in their abominations in the sight of God. Consider carefully what good could come from this, and prevent it.” (Luther p. 272[?])
“Jewish” dominion ideology continued and countered Luther’s warning
It seems the “Jewish” Kockba idea turned into a group financial and industrial wealth and business strategy that has continued until this day. The anti-Christian elite accumulated bank, industry, politics and media control. They multiplied their influence. They countered Luther’s threat of dominion over them and his restrictions for them to have business (and take advantage of others) in Christian lands. They eventually expanded and bought up local and regional media systems in prospective nations. People who have exposed them have been censored and countered with media programs that attempt to ameliorate the seriousness of the demise of Christians, other religious peoples and the non-“Jewish”. The aim seems to be a Jesus-denying and anti-Christian greater Israel, with a non-registered (Ezra 2.61-62) messiah that persecutes and rules over others.
Works Cited
“Broken Hearts with Ruth Graham”, YouTube, uploaded by, Pure Passion Media, Apr. 3,
“Democracy, n.” The Oxford Universal Dictionary, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1955.
“Gov DeSantis: They have made a HUGE mistake…”, YouTube,
uploaded by Fox News, Apr. 8, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9A5RCiAaNA. 6:42
“Usury, n.” The Oxford Universal Dictionary, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1955.
Ford, Henry, publisher. The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem. 1920
1922. [Radio Islam], [https://www.islam-radio.net/islam/english/books/ford/index.htm].
Graham, Billy. "Marriage, Your Home and You." Decision, June 1986, p. 2
Graham, Billy. The Answer to Broken Homes. Minneapolis, Billy Graham Evangelistic
Association, copyright 1953 (revised 1955) (copyright renewed 1981).
Leclercq, Henri. "The First Council of Nicaea." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol.
11. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11044a.htm.
Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 3 [Aug. 21, 1858-Mar. 4,
1860]. Rutgers University Press, 1953. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections.
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/lincoln3 Accessed April 26, 2026.
Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Vol. 5 [Oct. 24, 1861-Dec. 12, 1862].
Rutgers University Press, 1953. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections,
quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln5. Accessed April 26, 2026.
Luther, Martin. "On the Jews and Their Lies." 1543. Luther's Works, vol. 47: The Christian in
Society IV, translated by Martin H. Bertram, edited by Jaroslav Pelikan and Helmut T.
Lehmann, Fortress Press, 1971, pp. 121–306.
Protocols of the Elders of Zion, published by Islam-Radio
[https://www.islam-radio.net/protocols/ProtocolsOfZion.pdf]
State of Israel. Law of Return (Amendment No. 2), 5730-1970. Passed by the Knesset on
2nd Adar Bet, 5730 (10 Mar. 1970). Knesset,
main.knesset.gov.il/EN/about/history/documents/kns7_return_eng.pdf.
The Greek New Testament. Edited by Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort,
Harper & Brothers, 1881. Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University,
http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0031.tlg001.perseus-grc1, Accessed 4 April
2026.
The Holy Bible: King James Version. Electronic ed. of the 1769 edition of the 1611 Authorized
Version., Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995.
The Apocrypha: King James Version. Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995, p. 2 Mac 6:18.
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex: UXLC 2.5 (Build 27.6). Tanach.us Inc., Apr. 2026, tanach.us/.
United States, Congress. “8 CFR § 316.10 - Good Moral Character.” Electronic Code of
Federal Regulations, U.S. Government Publishing Office,
www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-316/section-316.10.
Accessed 15 May 2026.
United States. Naturalization Act of 1790, ch. 3, § 1, 1 Stat. 103, 103–0
Alphabetical Index
Amicable expulsion of non-Hebrew women and their children
Ezra 10 7
Desecration of genealogical law
Ezra 2.62 11
End times
Gentiles in Jerusaem
Luke 21:24 8
Found, ten lost tribes
Unity in Christ
James 1.1) 6
God's law must not be changed
Dt. 4:2 8
Inheritance
Nu. 36.7
Na ha la' 3
Inherited, not chosen (Ezra 2:61-63)
Unbroken, patrilineal chain of descendant from Aaron
Priest position 3
Israel of God
Believers in Jesus Christ
(Gal. 6.16) 5
Israeli law
Matrilineal law, not patrilineal (Nu. 36.5-13)
“Law of Return,” § 4B 2, 8
Kinsman redeemer and patrilineal law agreement
Ruth 4.18-22 7
Lack of Hebrew identity
Disqualification due to lack of birth certificate documentation (register)
Ezra 2:62 3
Land fraud
Political usurpation
Balfour Declaration 4
Likenesses, not differences
Sub-racial identity
Inherited genealogical-genetic traits 9
Patrilineal inheritance to the land of Israel
Nu. 36.5-13; Ezra 10.3; Dt. 4.2; Ezra 2.61-62; Ruth 4.18-22 6
Patrilineal lineage of Jesus Christ
Fulfillment of Dt. 18:15-19
Mt. 1:16, Luke 3:23 8
Return of the ten lost tribes
Unity in Christ
James 1.1 6
Scrutiny of genealogical law
Ruth 4.6 7
Y-DNA is not sufficient
Proper accounting of continuous, birth right--written documents are required
Nu. 36.5-13, Ezra 2:61-63 4
"Jewish" financial influence
Political power
Rothschild financial connection 4
"Jewish" Gentiles, not Hebrews
Modern Israel
Luke 21:24 6
Citations: Greek And Hebrew
Citations: Greek And Hebrew
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Nu. 36.7 3
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38.16 5
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezekiel 38.16 5
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62 11
Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.20) 15
