Nature, Theology, Law, Prophets and Fulfillment

Nature, Theology, Law, Prophets and Fulfillment

Kenneth W. Billings

February 25, 2026

CHAPTER I

Church Hierarchy

Persons of eternity:

God created the heavens and the earth (Gen.1.1). Col. 1:13-17 reveal to us that Jesus Christ performed the creation. He is also noted as our chief shepherd (I Peter 5). Gen. 1:2 in the Hebrew text tells us that the "ר֣וּחַ אֱלֹהִ֔ים" (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 1.2) “r'uach eloh'im'”, according to reading the Hebrew from right to left and then giving my transliteration to English from left to right, “Spirit of God”, was hovering over the face of the waters. Within the first two verses of the Bible taken as a whole as to creating, all three of the holy persons of God are united in the work.

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. (The Holy Bible, KJV, John 1.1-2)

Also, see the Nicene Creed as to former thought on the deity of Christ.

All believers are subject to the authority of God and his written word. They must worship him in spirit and truth. (John 4.24) There is no cleric above the written word of God. We are subject to God (Gal. 1.10-12), the apostles and prophets of the early church as written in the Scriptures, and their testimonies, not later followers and ministers that were merely taught (1 Cor. 14.36), and formed denominations and many times erring doctrines, especially from Rome and centuries later.

Servants of God: elders, bishops, deacons, and gifted believers as kings and priests

Elders consist of wise men of God, text translators dividing the truth rightfully (2 Ti. 2.15), and others of Godly, profound intellect and effort throughout the world; some ordained in the local church (I Pet 5.1-5, Acts 15, 1 Ti. 5.1, 17, Titus 1.5).

Repentance acceptable, but official disqualification is necessary when reputation is stained

They are men who acknowledge true repentance, including the change of bad habits of repentant men who have fell and come back to the Lord, obeying God and walking in truth. Not all elders today are qualified to be chosen as leaders in a church due their past sins. They may have lost their quality of life and honor of avoiding evil to not be able to live as officials of the church because their reputations are stained, and they are no longer without reproach (Titus 1.5-9), but on the other hand, have learned how to discern between clean and unclean and have been restored from sins and impurity through repentance. They are restored men who seek a pure relationship with God and have a desire to bless God and his people.

Failure of repentance

However, old mockers, self-made authorities, Orthodox, Protestants and others, and their associates and followers of irreligious and social schizophrenia as Roman Catholicism have not truly repented and ceded to the authority of the written word. The house of God must at least be instituted with the will of obedience to the higher authority of God and his written word, which is easily accessible to anyone who has a bible and a desire to study it.

Local church and holy ministry

Men who understand the law (1 Ti. 1. 8-11) and are able to judge and weed the lawless: We must remember the public church is to be a pure setting with Godly ministers. God chose “… before the foundation of the world... ” (Eph. 1.4) that we Christians, his chosen, live holy and blameless before him in love, how much also our local church ministers. We relate to marriage and purity with the mystery of Christ and the church. God loved and provided for his people, and our ministers must have purity and nothing significant the church may rebuke or the public may slander upon . Local officials must be like Timothy, who was trained under the Apostle Paul (Phil. 4.9).

Repentant failed ministers and satellite ministries under local church supervision

Nevertheless, this would not prevent blatant offenders repentance and restoration (Ps. 23.3) if they discontinue and manifest their previous contradictions to Scriptures and hidden darkness to the church. However, due to previous, public stain, it would disallow their official capacity in the local church. Perhaps, if such repented and were restored, they could participate with the others and they could also still have public ministries outside the local church if their deeds did not contradict the doctrine of the local church.

God gives gifts; however, proper standing with the public and doctrine of God must be learned and maintained to qualify as an official

A believer of God does not lose his gifts if he falls into a sin, but he can lose his opportunity as an official of the local church. In this case, he must be under supervision after repentance to be considered a follower of Christ and member of the church. However, as we see in our apostasy today, there are some, even as misplaced ministers in a local church, who have not shown repentance and have not been open about their marital and sexual relationships. Some have philosophically and openly promoted defiled marriage to others. Without holy, personal and intellectual transparency, I don't see how such a one could be either a qualified church official or have a qualified public ministry outside and other than the local church. Repentance, holiness and transparency is a necessity.

Virgin and chaste marriage transparency of officials necessary

Christians everywhere and local church members have a duty to require sexual transparency and to know whether the ones speaking to them have true repentance and qualification in their lives. Chastity testimonies should be something a righteous man would want and desire to clarify to his audience so as to verbally reveal his virginity and eligibility for marriage, but hardly ever do you hear men give such testimonies of themselves in the heretical churches. Their absence of a pure testimony is a sign of their lacking character or they are covering a scandal. Their sin will find them out. (Nu. 32.23)

Know the background and reputation of purity of the woman you plan to date

Our whole evangelism system needs to be revised and restored. No one can be personally edified as to purity by a man living in fornication or adultery or condoning such acts. Second marriages can only be tolerated when the first wife was ineligible as in (Mt. 19.9) and the church gives a document of annulment. Divorce documentation has been a necessity since the second law of Moses (Dt. 24.1-3). Nevertheless, men who have participated in such fornication, cannot qualify for the office of deacon because of their reproach, even though they may later still be husbands of one wife. (1 Ti. 3.12)

Avoid fornication: a minister must have a testimony of purity

He must prove he is not living in fornication or remarriage. After a couple have sex and complete the physical part of the marriage bond (Ex. 22 and Dt. 22) but the female is not accepted by the male or vice versa, then, when the female departs and has sex with another man than the first, it is an act of fornication. So, to avoid (1 Cor. 7.2) this condemned (Gal. 5.19) predicament, a man should take a female virgin he has either chosen, seduced or raped for his wife. If he doesn't marry her, he leaves her in a condition that she can't legitimately marry anyone else.

Adultery is different from fornication, but still condemned

A Christian minister must prove he is not living in fornication or remarriage

Understanding the Bible today requires knowledge of how Jesus the Christ fulfilled—changed, repealed and reproved (Mt. 19.9) the second law (specifically, Dt. 24:1-3) of Moses, which redacted the first law. It requires experiencing revelation of new things and “fulfillment” even beyond the first law of Moses. There are basically three different eras to be compared the first law of Moses, the second, and the fulfillment era of the new covenant (New Testament). The fulfillment era is the active one we have available to us today.

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Mt. 5.18)

The Old Testament law gave direction to the people of God. People progressed and were given refinements as the law and time advanced. Although the OT law was not perfect. If it had been, Moses during the second law (Deuteronomy) would not have said,

15 The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken; 16 According to all that thou desiredst of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not. 17 And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken. 18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.  (Dt. 18.15-18)

Spiritual progression: changes, spiritual growth and fulfillment of the law

Eventually, his commandments concerning remarriage were perfected through the “Prophet” (Dt. 15.15), the Lord Jesus Christ. Malachi foretold of his coming and moral reproof of infidelity: see Malachi 3:1-5. Fulfillment of the ten commandments and spiritual progress can be seen today through New Testament studies. Contrarily, beware, there are also false replacement teachings such as Islamic promotions, works of legalisms and anti-Christian doctrines instead of fulfillment replacement.

The Torah is a broad study. It can be considered the five books of the Old Testament law, and generally, the other writings and the fulfillment books of the New Testament. A safe comprehensive view may be obtained through the sixty-six books. The Jewish people have revived the Hebrew language although they are not Hebrew people. They have also molested and distorted Hebrew laws, especially concerning the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: intra-tribal marital, inheritance and anti-genocide law (Nu. 36.5-13). The made-up, Herzl matrilineal law and custom  (a form of Hebrew genocide) of the “Jewish” is not from the Torah; they have no required, continuous, Hebrew patrilineal, genealogical register and gene pool.

According to modern Israeli law and definition: “For the purpose of this Law, ‘Jew’ means a person who was born of a Jewish mother or has become converted to Judaism and who is not a member of another religion.” (Law of Return, 5710-1950, § 4B)

We Christians should make original bible language study one of our goals, especially Greek and Hebrew. Both languages were used by bible students before the coming of Jesus Christ. Deeper study would help us strengthen our witness for Jesus the Christ. One reason we have lost hegemony and influence is due to frauds, rejects and impostors gaining prestige through misrepresentation and the glory of the Hebrew language. Another is through the large number of atheists and anti-Christian media that support Herzl Zionism either through active support or passive distortion. Herzl himself was a reported atheist.

America's professors have been desensitized through opposition propaganda. Our educational and failed theological leaders, who are expected to be exact, precise and articulate, falsely portray the “Jewish” as Hebrews/Jews even in a presumed, genetically and theologically blurred manner. Christians should be able to detect their genealogical error. There are no Jews or Hebrew tribes in modern Israel. Matrilineal law of the Herzlists is evidence of that statement, it is in direct opposition to Hebrew patrilineal law. (Nu. 36.5-13)

The King David, “הַמֶּ֣לֶךְ דָּוִ֔ד” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 2 Sa. 7.18), transliterated, “ham'elek dahv'eed” (the accent mark giving emphasis for stress, loudness, or a higher pitch), is famous among Christians. He was a true Hebrew. Let us be like him and develop our bible studies. He loved the law:

1 Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. 2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. 3 And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper. (Ps. 1.1-3)

Let us not be misdirected in our theology or any other studies. Understanding the first and second law or generally the law, leads unto developing our understanding of the New Testament. We can begin with the NT, but we must be thorough and search the Scriptures, including the law. May we learn through our own research. May we Christians regain our theological knowledge renown and become the prominent lights in the dark world we live in through our revival of ancient language study and correct theology.

Apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers (Eph 4.11)

First of all, purity must be restored. Students of the Bible must gain Hebrew and Greek language skills. They must learn how to give precedence, without rebellion, to a biblical principle or law according to comparing the authority and righteousness of the eras. A new and more safe and spiritual rule of wedding ceremony is needed to prevent fornication and adultery. You can learn about this in chapter IV.

Prophets keep the people in line with sexual morality

The mainstream churches are following the minus the sexual morality commandments gospel proponents, those who tolerate and even promote sexual immorality. I would love to praise faithful men who lead. It is nice not to have to mention names many times and relate them to heresy, but sometimes it has to be done. Exposure and recognition of the “generals of immorality”—Hagin, Copeland, Oral Roberts—and those in similar adultery and fornication error must be made. Separation and shunning of such types is also expected. They took in big money and stood in the way of restoration. They led many astray. With such a vast, perverted and anti-Christian, so-called Christian media, it would take a miracle for many just to recover from the myth and immorality damage. Samuel was not so (1 Samuel 12.3-5, KJV). Prophets keep the people in line with sexual morality and God's written word. John the Baptist was faithful, even unto death.

Christian pro-active work

A reformation and restoration of the church is necessary. Modern pagan and anti-Christian (including erring churches) media has almost silenced good Christian teaching and preaching. However, we can still have a voice. Setting your vision to the task can make change. The Manhattan Project changed the military status in the US. It became a world power. It required recruiting skilled people to think, design, build, test, and change former technology.

The true church has to be pro-active also. We must reach those who can hear so they join us, only without paid salaries as those of the Manhattan Project and the false and erring church. Working for God is not a salary career, it is not a denominational effort (1 Cor. 1.13), it is bringing light to the world. The apostles did not sell their spiritual material. The Apostle Paul was a tent maker (Acts 18.2-3). Early Christians didn't follow modern commercial/business gain schemes to increase their outreach.

Sadly, many American adulterous, so-called evangelists or preachers would seemingly be insulted or ashamed to work for their living without high-end financial gain. We see this as a deterioration of society. Remember how well Samuel faithfully restored Israel by looking and submitting unto God, and afterward his sons became judges and changed the spiritual environment from good to bad by taking bribes (1 Samuel 8.3). We must avoid such corruption and covetousness diversions. May God bless us, amen.

Cults influencing institutions, preachers and teachers

We must understand that theology, history (eschatology—future history) and science work together. Genealogy and genetics progress has been hindered by the UN and its influenced subsidiaries, including public schools. A big error that Christians make today is believing Zion Revisionist Theory and that the modern “Jewish” are the same people as the ancient Hebrews. False. The people occupying Israel and living in various other countries and claiming to be heirs of the land (Israel) are telling you a lie. Actually, the “Jewish” man who claims he is a genealogical Jew is a fraud. He hi-jacks the fame and continuous, patrilineal-genealogical integrity of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the lineage (Nu. 36.5-13) of the patriarchs. He overlooks his crime, seemingly always circumventing the law (Torah). All of the fraudulent, revisionists, such as Ben Gurion, people militarizing and wanting to be Hebrews/Jews but with less genealogical and genetic credentials than the non-violent rejects whom were put away from the Hebrew people in Ezra 10 (KJV), were unable to become or make themselves biologically Hebrew.

Remember, there are no Jewish with registry today (Ezra 2.61-63). Therefore, they are genealogically polluted as to Hebrew law, unclean, and not Hebrews/Jews. They have been against race and racial nationalism because they cannot biblically present themselves as a genealogical (Nu. 36, 5-13), Hebrew race, but rather, and just the opposite, as a race-mixing cult. To agree with Japhethic, Semitic or Hamitic nations seeking like-race demographics and dominant-race racial purity is not to their advantage. They have gathered anti-Christian political support in large numbers from their deceived audiences, some even white-skinned self-haters and hating their race out of existence, including many unlearned Christians. So, to give light and to be definitive about the Hebrew race and its sub-races (tribes), it is necessary to understand the criterion of patrilineal continuity of Hebrew descendancy. All Hebrew tribes have become extinct.

Dumitru Duduman lack of genealogical knowledge: extinction of the Hebrews and Jews

Therefore, the Jewish are as a mere Gentile, no more a legitimate Hebrew as the Apostle Paul than the most distant Gentile. Either you have continuous, Hebrew patrilineal pedigree or you don’t. I personally believe Dumitru Duduman erred when he stated, “The angel of the Lord also told me, 'I have blessed this country because of the Jewish people who are in this country.'” (Duduman, “The Message For America”) The Jewish are a cult just as the Mormons. The former err as to lack of required pedigree and patrilineal-genealogy (Nu. 36.5-13) credentials (which Jesus Christ/yeshua hamashiach possessed) and promote made-up Herzl Matrilinealism but nevertheless falsely claim they are Hebrews (fraud), which does not warrant a legitimate right to the land of Israel, and of course, they promote many other sins; the latter err as to heeding to Joseph Smith false writings, polygamy and other things relating to his teachings.

Regardless, God does not have a special cult he wants to save; he wants to save sinners. He blesses those who obey him, demonstrating their faith; he punishes those that promote heresy. Anti-Christian Zionist revisionism is myth, and heresy, as well as polygamy and adultery. Similarly, Kenneth Copeland attempted to make it look like his remarriage was in agreement with God through a conversation with Him, but it wasn't! (Copeland, “Delight in the Good Life”) Should you believe every prophet? Every pastor? Every man that mentions God or claims He or one of his angels spoke with him? Absolutely not! Did Pat Robertson deceive Benny Hinn? Benny said, "I trust God's voice". (“Is Pat Robertson a false prophet?” (Robinson, 00:01:20-21)

144,000: past return of the Hebrew tribes after the time of Christ’s resurrection

We must let the Bible give us direction. If a prophet says to the contrary, it is not of God. Gordon Robertson, Pat's son recently, distinctly did not say that the ten tribes had already returned and misled his viewers about the timing of the past return of the Hebrew tribes as if they had not returned to the time of Christ and James 1:1. He falsely, implicitly, suggested a future pre-millenial coming, “There is a world-wide call… ” (“The 10 Lost Tribes Of Israel Explained” 00:01:37-39), even though all the Hebrew tribes eventually became extinct. Nevertheless, the ten tribes (part of the firstfruits) were found after the resurrection of Christ through the gospel. Since there is no Hebrew gene pool left, there is no possibility of a Hebrew tribal member today. We live in the day of the Gentiles (Luke 21.24) and post-firstfruits era.

It is impossible for the Jooish, a better term than “Jewish” because modern Judaism does not regard the genealogical law of Numbers 36:5-13 and Hebrew, ancient Judaism. They are unable to sacrifice as the ancient Hebrews, who are now extinct. They do not have a genetic gene pool to produce a Jew, let alone a Levite or Cohen/priest, who were necessary for Hebrew sacrifices.

They are not a pure people and never can be unless they repent of their unbelief and present faith in Jesus Christ. Even that could not make them Hebrew nor take them back to the time of the believing Hebrews, twelve tribes scattered and specifically addressed to by James the elder, who were God's chosen people (Galatians 6.15-16).

They are a misled Gentile (Ezra 2.61-63) cult, having lost or never had the Hebrew patrilineal pedigree, and have deceived many unlearned Christians. Gordon seems to be totally deceived as to not understanding the Hebrew requirement of patrilineal law, which the Jooish can never produce a patrilineal tribal member, including a Levite. Sacrifices were required to be offered through only the Levites in the temple complex, and never from rejects (Ezra 10) and non-Hebrews.

The gospels point toward a time of Jerusalem being populated by Gentiles. To me, that concept includes partial-Hebrew descendants failing patrilineal pedigree so as being not able to fulfill inheritance law (Nu. 36.5-13) nor able to be heirs of Israel. Remember the rejects of Ezra 10, who were put away. See Luke 21:24. Nevertheless, the impostors do have an anti-Christian platform and the potential to offer an AntiChrist.

Myth and delusion

Many docile people and unlearned Christians may have accepted overt, anti-Christians as a people they should honor, support or protect—horrible conclusion. The deceived have accepted Talmudist, erring prophecy rather than Christian prophecy. Our famous theologian and reformer Martin Luther warned of them. These people are no more special than the Watchtower people, who also deny the deity of Christ, who is God in the flesh, the “Son”, the flesh form of God.

The Joos, as I call them, have an artificial, genealogical and genetic history. They cannot produce a patrilineal Hebrew (Jew) from a Herzlist matrilineal non-Hebrew gene pool. Even though, they are a mixed-race Talmudic culture, not a Hebrew race. Notice the genealogical deterioration since the dispersion of Titus. Nevertheless, they are the same people who have slurred other nations for holding race sacred (Joshua 23.12-13).

Numbers 36:5-13: After the scattering of Babel, nations formed with their own languages. Abraham left Babel and a wicked family. God made him a father of many nations (Gen. 17.4-6). So, we see by the time that Numbers 36 had been written, God had established many nations and a Hebrew people that had descended from Abraham. They were a patrilineal race, which their patrilineal, genealogy is recorded in the Old and New Testament. In this chapter (36), God established the heirs of the land of Israel intra-racially, not just by race but by distinct tribes (sub-races) within the patrilineal Hebrew race. In Acts 2:11, we see the Jews and their proselytes still existed. So, the races through Shem, Japheth and Ham continued through sub-races. However, the Hebrew tribes (patrilineal, intra-racial groups) are no longer found (became extinct) sometime after the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus (70 AD). There is no patrilineal, Hebrew gene pool today, so there can't be any Jews. God will still take ownership of his land eventually, but it is occupied by fraudulent, “Jewish” Gentiles (Luke 21.24) at the present.

Bishops

Overseers (1 Ti. 3.1-7) of the local church building officials must be blameless, men of good reputation among society within and without the local church. As chief, local church officials, they are responsible to on-target elders throughout the world (wise and approved men of God, the early ones were formerly mentioned at Jerusalem and directed the apostles (Acts 15). The bishop foremost must be very knowledgeable and subject to the Scriptures; not a man as a novice (1. Ti. 3.7) or someone publicly exposing his shame as one who condones uncleanness and defiled marriage, fornication (1 Ti. 1.10) and adultery/remarriage. I will go into this more later.

Mockery and distortion

Actually, the Roman Catholic Pope, who has been erringly been acclaimed by misled followers as the leader of the church, cannot be biblically categorized higher than a mere bishop. As to his doctrines and actions, he should be considered no more than a schizophrenic (1 Ti. 2.5) and erring official of his local church at the Vatican.

The sacraments-theology does not agree with the teachings of the original disciples. How many of his followers realize an infant can't make a theological decision! Will the baptized infant, who was not able to understand the ritual of baptism he was put through, accumulate the faith and courage to make a public confession of baptism as he grows older while he is discouraged to accept adult baptism and a cognizant ritual as John the Baptist and even Jesus Christ himself, who fulfilled all righteousness?

14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me? 15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him. (Mt. 3. 14-15)

There is only one church and the Scriptures must be its authority. As to all failing denominations and religious organizations, many have explicitly denied church order (chapter V) and the concept of female submission. Through usurping and assuming positions designated for only men, women of the mainstream heresy have mocked God, the holy, local church, the idea and biblical requirement of submission, and the analogy of the mystery of Christ and the church as to marriage (Eph. 5.22-32).

Deacons (1 Ti. 3.8-13)

A deacon must be proven (1 Ti. 3.10), blameless, a man of good reputation among society and the church. A pure marriage is essential, local church officials must not be stained with promiscuity or remarriage: "husbands of one wife" (I Timothy 3.12).

Believers in Jesus Christ (our high priest) makes us as kings and priests

The messiah, having proven register and finite genealogy, the Son of God

We are a body called-out and have become transformed as kings and priests (Rev. 1.6, Ex. 19.6, 1 Peter 2.9), under our high priest, Jesus Christ. We are holy and saints (Ephesians 1.1), chosen by God (Eph. 1.4): bearing fruit of the Spirit: even the radiance upon a follower and submitter's face reveals God has given him peace and joy and it ministers to people. We are a people and a work of Jesus. Let us live in faith and reverence of our maker, implementing decency and order.

CHAPTER II

Bible Era Comparison

First law era: Genesis through Numbers

The modern “Jewish” are cult proselytes and do not recognize the mandate of God in Nu. 36:5-13. Those that trust God’s word and Christians that follow him do. The frauds circumvent and twist/molest the written Scriptures. Myth, deception and defilement will eventually bring great judgment upon the Earth. (Isaiah 24)

Second law era: Deuteronomy through Malachi

“DEUTERONOMION” (Brenton Septuagint, Dt.), my transliteration of the word “DEUTERONOMY” in the Greek text (Brenton Septuagint, Dt.), the fifth book of the bible, means generally “second law”, relating or similar to a "מִשְׁנֵה֙ תּוֹרַ֣ת מֹשֶׁ֔ה" (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Joshua 8.32)—"copy of the law of Moses" (my trans.), according to reading the Hebrew from right to left and then giving my transliteration to English from left to right, "mishnay' tor'at mosh'ay".

Evidently, the Hebrew translators of the Greek edition must have realized there were two dispensations of Moses' law. They did not refer to the book merely from the first two words as is used in the modern, Hebrew title, "אֵ֣לֶּה הַדְּבָרִ֗ים" (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 1.1), according to reading the Hebrew from right to left and then giving my transliteration to English from left to right, “a'ylleh haddevar'im''”, meaning “these are the words” (my trans.), but the book was seemingly given a title denoting its subsequent content, a copy of the law. (I discussed that in the former paragraph.) Greek texts are revealing of many things: therefore, relatively speaking, there must have been a first giving of a set of laws by Moses. We will take a look into how we can decipher the first giving of the law from the second through a study of a reproof and repeal of divorce and remarriage by Jesus Christ the Lord.

OT. remarriage is considered adultery in the fulfillment era, New Testament (Mt. 5.32, Mt. 19.9)

The modern “Jewish” recognize the second law era remarriage law of Dt. 24:1-3 because they don’t obediently take part of the formerly prophesied (Je. 31.31) , new covenant and believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God nor do they adhere to the NT, whereas Christians recognize the New Testament era reproof and rejection of remarriage (Mt. 19.9) by the Lord Jesus Christ. The latter hold remarriage as adultery (Mt. 5.32). It seems the NWO and anti-Christian elite have promoted the ill sexual effect of the modern “Jewish” and elite anti-Christianity upon civilization, and even many unlearned and myth-believing Christians have been deceived by not understanding the eras and eschatology, as I mentioned in chapter I, as well.

Third era: New Testament

The modern “Jewish” do not recognize the Lord Jesus Christ as the future prophet mentioned by Moses in the second law era (Dt. 18.15-19). Therefore, all of their study including the Talmud is in disbelief and not of faith. Some of their studies may seem very beautiful using great tools of language: Hebrew and Aramaic, but if you leave Jesus Christ out of the Bible, you cannot learn God’s will nor be able to follow him. A person who denies God’s Christ denies God himself. Remember, the modern Jewish are not the same genealogical and genetic people as the Old Testament Hebrews of true and ancient Judaism, and their cultist, Jewish Gentile (Luke 21.24) lack of Hebrew genealogical (Nu. 36.5-13) and racial values are evident. So is their disbelief.

The relative first dispensation of Old Testament law, marital purity and continuity

Genesis gives us a history of God's creation. Through it and other books of the bible we are given a chronological, ideological glimpse of the past, present and future. God's written word tells us what (and whom!) we need to know according to all time. “Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God.” (Psalm 90.2) We know history, and future expectations, even future history according to events that have not already passed but shall pass at a time in the future.

One event that passed was the coming of the expected prophet of God's people

The book of Exodus, separate from the book of Deuteronomy, relatively can be respected as a book of the first giving of the law. Genesis through Numbers preceded the giving of the book of Deuteronomy. Exodus explains the dowry responsibility of a man who takes the virginity of a girl (Ex. 22.16). Even if her father disallows the man to marry her, the man is still required to pay the dowry price (Ex. 22.17). The second giving of the law supplements the concept of the prerequisite of female virginity and sexual chastity for marriage (Dt. 22.13-21, 28, 29). However, as you will see later, Deuteronomy made some changes to the first law. Even later on, bringing in the new covenant, Jesus Christ made a greater difference upon both law eras.

Jesus clarified his changes and improvements of the way people were to live. He made it clear that the law would be fulfilled: “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” (Mt. 5.18)

Now, let's look at the correcting and repeal of the divorce and remarriage law in the “second” giving of the law (Dt. 24.1-2)

1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. 2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife.  (Dt. 24.1-2)

The Pharisees, tempting the Lord Jesus, referred to the divorce law. Jesus answering, implied that particular giving of the law was not fulfilling God's intention of marital purity and continuity, referring to the previous and historical times written in Genesis: “… from the beginning… ”. (Mt. 19.8)

7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? 8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. (Mt. 19.7-8)

Fornication is different concept than adultery

Now, let’s go to Mt. 19:9. A defiled woman of immorality, for instance, Rahab the harlot, who became a woman of faith (Hebrews 11.31), wife of Salmon (Luke 3.32), and progenitor of Boaz (Mt. 1.5), patrilineal Hebrew and great-grandfather of King David and ancestor of the lineage of Joseph (Mt. 1.16, Luke 3.23), husband of Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, seemingly was tolerated in the Old Testament in some cases as well as divorcees (Dt. 24.1-3) except if the husband decided it was not a clean relationship (Dt. 23.14). Nevertheless, a whore and woman of fornication was a valid reason for divorce (Matthew 19.9).

However, a formerly married woman could not remarry in the second law era without a writing of divorce—divorce papers (Dt. 24.1-3) or it would be considered adultery, a death-penalty offense. Although later as to New Testament spiritual progression and fulfillment of the law, the reproof of Jesus Christ was more strict as to the concept of adultery and condemned remarriage (another marriage of a woman after leaving a legitimate husband). Perhaps this increased moral fulfillment pertaining to the correction of infidelity in sexual relationships of a future era (the new covenant) is hinted in Malachi 3:1-5.

And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. (KJV, Mt. 19.9)

We know that a marriage of betrothal could be annulled due to female defilement, but the word “fornication”, which I transliterate “pornei'ai” (Westcott and Hort, Matt. 19.9), may have a different connotation than just from a betrothal defect, which seems to be the pertinent matter in this verse. Perhaps, it may also connote toward immorality in general and include a broad sense of sexual defilement.

Nevertheless, dissecting the verse, the first part of the compound predicate, whosoever “… shall put away…” (KJV, above in v. 9) or using a more modern term, “divorces” his wife, only legally and spiritually stops the current relationship of marital uncleanliness due to the fornication phrase—“… except it be for fornication… ” (KJV, Mt. 19. 9) or in other words, “except for immorality”—the offense (see Eph. 5:5), the lack of morality, divine and pure union structure and holiness (Eph. 5.22-33); it is the second part of the compound predicate that reveals the committing of adultery—and “… whoso marrieth her which is put away… ” (KJV, Mt. 19.9) or in my paraphrastic perception of the meaning of the earlier English language, “marries” a “divorced woman”.

Manuscript and text discernment

However, there is a great discrepancy here as to Mt. 19:9 (KJV): some earlier Greek texts do not say a “divorced woman”, but, according to my perception, transliteration and translation, say merely “a'llan”—“another woman” (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9)—which I transliterate from part of the verse, “… gama'sai a'llan moicha'tai” (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9).

Exception phrase: female promiscuity prevents a legitimate marriage

Both texts, the English (KJV, Mt. 19.9) and the Greek (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9), due to my perception and understanding of the exception phrase, “except it be for fornication” (KJV, Mt.19.9), imply a promiscuous woman can’t establish a legitimate and binding marriage. (If she were not unchaste, according to my view of the Greek phrase, “ma' epi' pornei'ai” (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9),  and my transliteration and translation, “except for immorality”, the male would be guilty of adultery.)

Besides that issue, it seems the KJV text refers to a marriage with a divorcee, “whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery” (KJV, Mt. 19.9), whereas the Greek, Mt 19:9 text according to my perception, transliteration and translation refers to “another” woman—“a'llan” (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9), a woman not necessarily a divorcee (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9). See Mark 10:11 in the KJV.

Nevertheless, the KJV text generally agrees as to whoever should marry “… her that is divorced committeth adultery” (KJV, Mt. 5.32); and according to my perception of transliteration and translation of “… apolelume'nan gama'sai moicha'tai” (Westcott and Hort, Mt. 5:32), the Greek does so also.

A promiscuous woman cannot form a legitimate marriage: the man is not bound

 I suppose we can assume the first part of the compound predicate, "shall put away" (KJV, Mt. 19.9), in one sense, implies that it is proper to divorce a defiled woman of fornication even as Joseph was thinking about putting away Mary, the mother of Jesus (Mt. 1.19). The one who puts away or divorces would not even be prevented from marrying another.

However, the remedy and exception phrase of a case of betrothal could not be the same as a case wherein a defiled dowry wife (which required female virginity and chastity) who committed lesbianism or other form of sexual defilement. Then, it seems the man who divorces would not be tolerated to marry another due to the expiration of polygamy. See 1 Cor. 7:27 and Mark 10:11.

On the other hand, however, if fornication were expanded to mean such immorality it would not negate or nullify Jesus' explanation of betrothal marriage concerning divorce and marriage. The former case would have involved the woman in an act of defilement before consummation with the man who put her away, whereas the latter would not have.

Era change: remarriage is not permitted in the New Testament/Covenant

Remarriage (divorcing and marrying another man while the first husband is still alive) with a divorce paper was permitted in the Old Testament. However, the Lord Jesus Christ brought in the new covenant/testament and gave us better instruction concerning the way God wants people to live as individuals, communities and peoples. Christians are under grace, not under the law. The Scriptures had to be fulfilled concerning the new covenant that God said he shall make with his people: "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:" (Je. 31.31). Of course, this new covenant and change of the way how people were to live for God should have had an effect on the laws and customs of nations, which it did!

Notwithstanding, the apostasy has come about and perversion of the principles of the new covenant have been manifested in our decaying societies. Today in the USA, legalized adultery is manifest (Gal. 5.19) and the nation's negligence of sexual morality is just about equivalent to that of tolerating murder. We have suffered pseudo-philosophy from Machiavellian ethics to erring Protestant, Orthodox, or popish and anti-Christian, so-called morality. Nevertheless, Christians must strive to obey God even when government antagonizes against their good works.

Let's take a look at the old testament law:

When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. (Dt. 24.1)

Discerning between satisfaction and dissatisfaction: Note in verse 24:1, the woman spoken of who has an uncleanness (ervah: explained below) is not one of the dowry brides, women who were accepted by the husband with a price as not defiled and not allowed to be divorced (Dt. 22.13-19), which Christians should be like. The Lord expected holiness from his people. There was not supposed to be anything in the Hebrew camp/community that would displease God and cause him to turn away from the people instead of to bless them. Impliedly, from the context, one thing that could turn him away would be if he saw an “עֶרְוַ֣ת דָּבָ֔ר” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 23.15), according to reading the Hebrew from right to left and then giving my transliteration to English from left to right, “erv'at dav'ar”, something showing a nakedness, uncleanness (Dt. 24.1) or an occurrence of something contrary to holiness.

The late centuries have brought in neglect of biblical principles, passivity and tolerances of evil that destroy family values and building blocks. Dowry-bride law was a part of establishing chastity among the women of Israel. Strict punishment (the death penalty) enforced it, “… so shalt thou put evil away from among you.” (Dt. 22.21) Israel was commanded and expected to establish communities of clean women. An alleged defiled woman that did not have proof of her innocence could not pass the test!

Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father’s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you. (Dt. 22.21)

Also, according to these verses, these alleged unclean (Dt. 24.1-3) and dis-satisfactory women, under different circumstances of biblical law and not under as strict obligation as the dowry wives, who were expected to be clean and never divorced at the risk of capital punishment, could “remarry”, but eventually as time passed, divorce and remarriage law was repealed by the teaching of Jesus and was not permitted in the new covenant, as we saw in the Mt. 19:9 discussion. Polygamy also expired.

And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife (Dt. 24.2)

Now, look at the explanation concerning the divorce law and its reproof by the Lord Jesus Christ:

2And the Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife? tempting him. 3 And he answered and said unto them, What did Moses command you? 4 And they said, Moses suffered to write a bill of divorcement, and to put her away. 5 And Jesus answered and said unto them, For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept. (Mark 10.2-5)

As you can see above in Mark 10, v. 4, they were referring to the law of Moses (Dt. 24.1-2) and v. 3 below:

 3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; (Dt. 24.3).

The Pharisees and the Jews had a problem with their women at that time, but if we go back to the beginning, as Jesus refers to in Mark 10:6, we see that Adam and Eve did not have any problem with uncleanness. Marriage was designed a unity that should not be broken. Divorce was not intended:

But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. (Mark 10.6)

Adam and Eve experienced a new dimension of their physical usefulness through having sex. Adam's intellect was opened due to the experiment: “And Adam knew Eve his wife… ” (Gen. 4.1). Their union was honorable, clean and  not defiled: “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” (He. 13.4) No one should break up a marital unity that is ordained of God. (However, note, later on after the law of Moses, there were refusals of marriage and inheritance due to miscegenation in Ezra 10. Hence, they were not considered legitimate marriages. The female ex-spouses and their children were even separated from the people. So, we’ve seen that miscegenation during the early Second Temple period and female promiscuity during the NT prevented legitimate marriage among the Hebrews as they endeavored to become Christians.)

Promiscuity threat: even Mary could not have married Joseph if the angel had not enlightened him

Notwithstanding, fornication (Mt. 19.9) gave reason to separate or divorce from the once unity. Impliedly Mary, the mother of Jesus, was untouched by a man until after the birth of Jesus. Did you ever wonder why the Bible says Joseph was "righteous" as to thinking about putting Mary away—divorcing? (Mt. 1.19) Even though Joseph was learned of the law, the angel of the Lord corrected (Mt. 1.20) his pre-meditative decision to separate from her. However, his intentions were based on marital purity and righteousness. It is righteous to divorce under the circumstances of a woman who has fornicated so as to prevent a whole family from being unclean, and it is wise to prevent such a circumstance.

You can learn biblical principles of marital unity and separation law at the introduction of my paper "Illusion". We should understand that fornication is unclean and corrupts a whole family that does not do anything about it, by not divorcing and putting away the uncleanness. America's families have suffered greatly because of devastation and neglectful consequent uncleanliness (failure of divorce proceedings) due to ignorance, deception and heresy!

Every married man has a responsibility to keep his wife under every circumstance, except one: if his wife is unchaste, that is, if his wife has partaken in a sexual act with someone else—this is sexual defilement, secret (Nu. 5.29-31) or open, if not adultery, secret or open—(John 8.4). Then, and only then, is the husband lawfully (according to the Bible) to put away his wife, and to give her a bill of divorcement. Logically, if a woman, has committed a sin of fornication with someone, a bill of divorcement does not induce her to become unchaste—she has already committed the act which defiled her.

And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. (Mt. 19.9)

Adultery consists of two distinct acts: you don’t commit adultery by merely separating

If a man puts away his wife for any reason other than fornication, he causes her to commit adultery (Mt. 5.32). Fundamentally, from a synoptical viewpoint, there are two distinct acts, the one subsequent to the other, which constitute adultery. The first act is a sin of “putting away” because the Scripture says the husband “shall cleave unto his wife” (Gen. 2.24); and also, that no one should separate what God has yoked together (Mk. 10.9)—“one flesh” (Gen. 2.24). The second sinful act, “marry another”, is subsequent to the first. It also contradicts 1 Cor. 7:10, 11. The Lord Jesus explained that going beyond divorce to “marry another” constitutes adultery:

10 And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same matter. 11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. 12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery. (Mark 10.10-12)

So, clearly, remarriage for any reason other than fornication is adultery and against the teaching of the Lord. Take for instance a case of betrothal. If a man had betrothed a wife and had not slept with her yet similarly as Joseph and Mary before the chaste birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, but then his woman fornicated, failing to keep chaste, would leave him in a predicament. Since he did not become a legitimate one flesh with her through the attempt of consummation, he was not committed (Mt. 19.9) to the marriage to her because she failed her chastity obligation. Remember, female lack of virginity in the OT. also prevented a marriage and concurred the death penalty (Dt. 22.21) for the female who attempted to get a husband through fraud. Hence, he was no longer bound to her or the betrothal knowing her moral, physical and spiritual deficit. He could lawfully divorce and annul the relationship without being obligated to a marriage. Marriage, different from fornication, is based on becoming one flesh through faith and purity as the example Adam and Eve gave us.

Female uncleanness that cannot be restored requires separation (2 Samuel 20.3)

However, if he was a man who had different circumstances and married through consummation, and if his wife erred (Nu. 5.12) later through committing adultery or some other horrible sexual act, he could lawfully divorce her so as not to defile his whole family by living with such an unclean woman.  However, he still would be obligated to remain single due to the New Testament concept of monogamy (1 Cor. 7.27) and the direction of the Apostle Paul.

Chaste re-uniting vs. abomination

Now, let's consider a chaste re-union in comparison with the matter of the defiled relationship of Dt. 24:4. If a woman is married to a man and she divorces him, of course they would be separated but hypothetically she could join back with him as long as she remains chaste. However, that re-uniting would be a “restoration” of the marriage; it would not be technically “remarrying” as in the sense of adultery, which is erringly permitted and occurs in the modern, heretical congregations.

Abomination of return of defiled wife

However, on the other hand, if the woman divorces her husband and remarries to another man, she becomes an adulteress. She would be a defiled woman (lacking purity as Eve, wife of Adam) even to her second man whether he recognizes it or not. Then, after becoming a remarried woman and no longer chaste, and not being satisfied with her consequent man, if she leaves him also and re-unites with her first man it would be an abomination:

Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance. (Dt. 24.4).

The stain of remarriage never leaves

If she became defiled by her second man and rejected him, she could rightfully break up the sinful relationship but certainly could not become undefiled by leaving him. Her unchastity would be a physical and spiritual disgrace that she would have to live with for the rest of her life. It would be impossible for her to restore her marriage with her first man. King David could not have sex with his defiled concubines (a fulfilled prophecy of Nathan the prophet) after the treachery of Absalom (2 Samuel 12.11, 2 Samuel 16.22); they lived as widows (2 Samuel 20.3). Even though she may go through a legal proceeding for marriage or not to be re-united with him, it would be in vain and would constitute an abomination.

Maintaining purity always pays off

Women must bear in mind to remain chaste and not get involved in affairs, becoming defiled. If a woman lives in an unhappy marriage and her husband leaves her, she should live single and keep her dignity. Perhaps in the future her husband and she may decide to live together again, which would be acceptable.

                                      Works Cited: Chapter I, II

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex: UXLC 2.5 (Build 27.6). Tanach.us Inc., Apr. 2026, tanach.us/.

Brenton, Lancelot C. L. The Septuagint Version of the Old Testament. Published in 1982 by

Zondervan, 1971.

Copeland, Kenneth, “Delight in the Good Life”, Kenneth Copeland Ministries, kcm.org,

Accessed on Jan. 18, 2013, https://www.kcm.org/real-help/article/delight-good-life

Duduman, Dumitru. “The Message For America”, Dreams and Visions From God , Hand of

Help, Inc., 1996 (First edition listed as 1994) Michael Boldea, Hand of Help Ministries

handofhelp.com, https://handofhelp.com/vision_1.php

Accessed Apr., 12, 2026

1996 (First edition listed as 1994) Michael Boldea, Hand of Help Ministries

handofhelp.com, https://handofhelp.com/vision_1.php

Accessed Apr., 12, 2026

“Is Pat Robertson a false prophet? 'Mitt Romney will win the presidential election!'”, YouTube,

uploaded by, Larry Robinson, Nov. 9, 2012,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6xBo9EijIQ&t=73s. 1:30

Israel. Knesset. "Law of Return, 5710-1950." Refworld, 5 July 1950,

https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1950/en/34127.

“The 10 Lost Tribes Of Israel Explained”, YouTube,

uploaded by, The 700 Club, Apr. 5, 2024,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dGBs6g8GrU&t=2s. 2:25

The Holy Bible: King James Version. Electronic ed. of the 1769 edition of the 1611 Authorized

Version., Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995.

The Greek New Testament. Edited by Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort,

Harper & Brothers, 1881. Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University,

http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0031.tlg001.perseus-grc1, Accessed 4 April

2026.

Back To Source Page or Next Chapter

Chapter III

Free book page: https://hesedken.com/free_book.html

Alphabetical Index

A new and more safe and spiritual rule       

prevention of fornication and adultery       

wedding ceremony        6

Abomination of living with return divorced and remarried wife       

Dt. 24:4        20

Adam and Eve marital purity       

No uncleanness, no divorc       

Mark 10:6        18

Adultery       

explanation       

Mt. 5.32, Mt. 19.9        12

another        15, 16

Apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers       

a more excellent way: (1 Cor. 12.27-31)       

Eph 4.11        6

(1 Cor. 12.27-31)        6

Eph 4.11        6

avoidance of       

fornication       

1 Cor. 7.2        3

Baptism of Jesus Christ       

fulfilling all righteousness       

Mt. 3. 14-15        11

Believers as kings and priests in the body of Christ       

Jesus Christ is our high priest       

Believers in Jesus Christ        11

Biblical eras and fulfillment       

specifically, Dt. 24:1-3       

Mt. 19.9        4

building upon the NT       

researching the law       

search the Scriptures        6

church       

official       

Elders        1

church hierarcy       

blameless       

local church ministers        2

official disqualification       

Titus 1.5-9        1

citation       

Hebrew       

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 1.2        1

The King David       

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 2 Sa. 7.18        5

cognizant ritual       

infant can't make a cognizant decision to be baptized       

baptism        10

coming of the expected prophet: Jesus Christ       

Acts 3.18-24        13

correlation with Dt. 24:1-3       

divorce       

Mt. 19:9        17

created       

Gen. 1.1       

God        1

deacon       

Husband of one wife       

I Timothy 3.12        11

deacon disqualification       

fornication       

1 Ti. 3.12        3

defiled women living separated: as widows       

2 Samuel 20.3        21

different from the second giving of the law by Moses       

NT reproof and repeal by Jesus Christ       

first giving of the law        12

direction of the apostles by the elders       

early church at Jerusalem, not Rome       

Acts 15        10

discrepancy between early Greek text       

Mt. 19:9 (KJV)        15

dissastisfactory women       

unclean       

Dt. 24.1-3        17

divorce       

Hardness of heart       

Mark 10.2-5        18

divorce and remarriage law       

Dt. 24:1-3        12

divorce papers necessary for remarriage in OT.       

Dt. 24.1-3        15

eloh'im       

Gen. 1.2       

God        1

ervat davar       

matter of uncleanliness       

Dt. 23.15        17

Dt. 24.1        17

eternity: extends toward opposite directions       

God has been from everlasting and will continue for ever       

Psalm 90.2        13

Psalm 90.2        13

exception phrase allows divorce from woman of fornication       

Mt. 19.9        15

false presidential election prediction       

citation       

Did Pat Robertson deceive Benny Hinn        8

female promiscuity prevents a legitimate marriage       

Exception phrase (Mt. 19.9)        15

Female uncleanness that cannot be restored requires separation       

2 Samuel 20.3        20

first wife must have been unworthy (Mt. 19.9)       

annulment document should be presented       

Second marriages        3

foretold of his coming and moral reproof of infidelity       

commandments concerning remarriage were perfected through the “Prophet” (Dt. 15.15)       

commandments concerning remarriage were perfected through the “Prophet” (Dt. 15.15)        5

form of fornication       

lesbianism        16

form of immorality       

different from fornication       

Adultery        3

fornication condemnation       

Gal. 5.19        3

fulfillment of the law       

the law is good if a man use it rightfully (1 Ti. 1-8-11)       

Mt. 5.17        4

Genealogy and genetics: “Jewish” peope are the not the same people as the ancient Hebrews       

Zion Revisionist Theory       

Cults        7

God       

created       

Gen        1

influenced by "Jewish" myth       

lack of genealogical knowledge (Nu. 36:5-13)       

Dumitru Duduman        8

influencing institutions, preachers and teachers       

Zion Revisionist Theory       

Cults        7

Israeli law       

Herzl Matrilinealism       

Law of Return, 5710-1950, § 4B        5

Israeli Official Law       

Herzl Matrilinealism       

Law of Return, 5710-1950, § 4B        5

Jerusalem and Gentiles       

Luke 21.24        13

Jesus Christ       

created       

Col. 1        1

Jesus Christ has proven genealogy through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob       

Jesus Christ fulfilled Dt. 18:15-18       

proven register        11

lack of virginity, folly of fornication and attempting to marry       

death penalty       

Dt. 22.21        17

lacking fidelity       

lacking repentance       

marital transparency        2

let not fornication be once name among you       

be pure, be chaste       

Eph. 5.1-5        4

meditation of the law       

makes a man like a tree planted by the rivers of water       

a tree planted by the rivers of water        6

mere bishop as to hierarchy       

disqualification of church official possibilities due to intellectual and theological heresies       

Pope        10

disqualification of church official possibilities due to intellectual and theological mediator heresies (1 Ti. 2.5)       

Pope        10

must not be remarried       

must not be a fornicator       

minister        3

my sermon, "Illusion"       

biblical principles of marital unity and separation law        19

no discrepancy between KJV and early Greek text       

Mt. 5.32        16

no Torah-required "Jewish" registry today       

Genealogical pollution and desecration       

Ezra 2.61-63        8

Official disqualification       

stained reputation       

Titus 1.5-9        1

One mediator: Jesus Christ       

1 Ti. 2.5        10

Open defilement       

adultery       

John 8.4        19

OT. divorce law       

Dt. 24.1        17

Overseers must be blameless, men of good reputation       

bishops       

1 Ti. 3.1-7        10

pertains to a female divorcee       

KJV, Mt. 19.9        16

pertains to another woman, not necessarily a divorcee as the KJV says       

Westcott and Hort, Mt. 19.9        16

pre-creation of the world       

predestination       

Eph. 1.4        2

pre-marriage       

sexual intercourse       

physical part of the marriage bond        3

prescription for race and demographics       

intra-tribal marital, inheritance and anti-genocide law       

intra-tribal marital, inheritance and anti-genocide law        5

promote morality like John the Baptist       

they do not condone immorality, remarriage-adultery, fornicaton       

Prophets        6

prophecy of Moses       

a prophet like unto Moses to come       

Dt. 18.15-18        4

prophesied new covenant       

Je. 31.31        17

protection of virginity among God's people       

Dt. 22.13-21, 28, 29        14

purity and fidelity is a necessity       

faithfulness       

marital transparency        2

transparency        2

marriage through virginity       

Chastity testimonies        3

race is sacred       

warning of dissolution       

Joshua 23.12-13        10

repeal of former, OT. divorce and remarriage law       

Mt. 19.7-8        14

restoration of purity       

The school of prophets        6

revisionist       

failing Hebrew genealogy proof (Ezra 2:61-63)       

Ben Gurion        7

Scripture       

church hierarchy       

1 Ti. 5.1, 17        1

Acts 15        1

I Pet 5.1-5        1

Titus 1.5        1

correctly explaining       

2 Ti. 2.15        1

correctly explaning       

2 Ti. 2.15        1

created       

Gen. 1:2        1

dowry law       

Ex. 22 and Dt. 22        3

NT law guideline       

1 Ti. 1. 8-11        2

shepherd       

I Peter        1

subjection       

Gal. 1.10-12        1

the Word       

John 1.1-2        1

worship       

John 4.24        1

secret defilement       

law of jealousies       

Nu. 5.29-31        19

sin will find a person out       

faithfulness and carrying God's message       

Nu. 32.23        3

soul       

restoration       

Ps. 23.3        2

Speaking with God and obeying farce       

citation       

Copeland, “Delight in the Good Life        8

stained reputations       

lacking repentance       

misplaced ministers        2

the law is our school teacher       

it is made for the unrighteous man       

1 Ti. 1:8-11        4

thought of thinking Mary was a woman of fornication by Joseph was reproved by an angel       

Mt. 1.19        16

two distinct acts       

1 putting away, 2 marrying another       

Adultery        19

Adultery        19

type       

treachery of not marrying first sex partner and then marrying another       

fornication        3

Unbelief and theological failure of the "Jewish"       

Dt. 18.15-19        13

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 1.2       

Hebrew       

Citations        1

when to remain single       

1 Cor. 7.27        20

whoremongering condemned       

Eph. 5:5        15

Citations