Nature, Theology, Law, Prophets and Fulfillment

Nature, Theology, Law, Prophets and Fulfillment

Kenneth W. Billings

February 25, 2026

CHAPTER III

How The Law Determines

Whom the land of Israel belongs: (Num. 36.5-13)

The ten lost tribes were found by God through the gospel: They were firstfruits. (James 1.1) The Assyrian captivity of the Hebrew tribes resulted in cultural change if not genealogical and subsequently genetic among the captured peoples. I believe we can correctly assume that the chosen of the lost tribes became (James 1.1) part of the firstfruits as well as the remainder (Judah and Benjamin) of the believing-in-Christ tribes of Israel through the gospel. Note, James did not say the “two” remaining tribes, no, he addressed the twelve tribes. Christians must beware of the “Jewish” Hebrew-replacement eschatology myth.

Today, in the general area the Assyrians may have taken their captives of Israel, Muslim and Kurdish ruled areas, there have no known tribes appeared who have maintained patrilineal-genealogy, which is required (Ezra 2.61-63). Perhaps the disconnected Israeli people were forced by their captors to change their Hebrew, patrilineal genealogical law or maybe they compromised on their own. Whatever the case may be, no patrilineal tribes with legitimate pedigree and register can be found. Without patrilineal law and genealogical register, no one can obtain genealogical inheritance! If a person can’t claim genealogical inheritance, he can’t claim genetic inheritance. The person must be born into it. Without a patrilineal father with pedigree and genealogical register that is impossible.  So, anyone, even if he becomes a Herzl Matrilinealist cult member and claims he loves the Hebrew law, cannot resume the former biology and pedigree of the ancient Hebrews.

Merely removing the foreskin of the penis (circumcision) cannot make a Philistine (1 Samuel 14.6) or “Jewish” person a Hebrew. A Jooish baptism (mikveh) cannot make a Hebrew. Ceremonies or religious tenets cannot change the genealogical and genetic state of being. There is no way a member of modern Judaism, a non-Hebrew (a person who lacks continuous, patrilineal descendancy), can make himself as a member of ancient Judaism and a Hebrew heir (Nu. 36.5-13) of Israel. Modern Joodaism/Judaism and matrilineal law is proof of the current, fraudulent possession of the state of Israel itself.

Israelite prescription for race and demographics

Even before the law of Moses, God had established the moral of racial exclusion and institution of homogeneity among the nations following the scattering at the Tower of Babel and eventually at the separation of Ishmael (Gen. 21.9-13), which implemented the calling of the people of God through Isaac. Intra-racial marriage and dispensational fulfillment:

Marriage, Hebrew identity, priesthood and posterity

Moses, earlier who did not marry a Hebrew (Nu. 12.1) when he joined with an Ethiopian woman, reproved himself later in Nu. 36 and commanded the children of Israel to follow strict patrilineal rules on both sides of the marriage intra-tribally (Nu. 36.5-13). Ezra followed this rule for male and female (Ezra 10.3). Also Ruth's marriage,  during the period of the judges, was not the norm and deviated on the matrilineal side even after the law (Nu. 36.5-13) was given. However, significantly, she obtained grace through Naomi and the kinsman redeemer law. Her marriage was patrilineal Hebrew on Boaz's (her husband) side and their posterity were still considered heirs. The Maccabees  (King James Version Apocrypha,1 Maccabees 2.1-4), after the second temple was built and over a hundred years and more before Christ, also recognized the Hebrew, patrilineal law as the rule to determine Abrahamic/Jacobic/Hebrew family and priesthood from Aaron “… throughout their generations” (Ex. 40.15).

Earlier, some who claimed to be Hebrews, failed the patrilineal genealogy register at the time of Ezra and were penalized as to loss of holy official administration and Hebrew identity (Ezra 2.61-63). They claimed Hebrew lineage but without proof for at least a generation or so and were rejected, but as trying to make the current in the river run in the opposite direction, the modern “Jewish” absolutely cannot claim matrilineal lineage for centuries and pass for a continuous, patrilineal, Hebrew! They have no one without a broken genealogical chain, therefore they are incapable of presenting a Hebrew tribal member and they can’t form a Hebrew gene pool ever.

DNA is not an acceptable source, birth certificate register is

Something that does not matter anyway as to failing the fulfilling of the continuous, patrilineal genealogical law, they may not even be the same Noahic race of Shem as a those with patrilineal, Hebrew Semitic DNA at the time of the early church. Regardless of their genealogical distance, there are no registered Hebrews in the world, and the Martrilineal Herzlists cannot offer a sacrifice without a registered, Hebrew religious official according to the Hebrew Torah.

Beware of made-up religion

The modern “Jewish”/Herzl Matrilinealists, have no Hebrew register, identity, inheritance nor legitimate priesthood either. Anyone today can claim to be a Hebrew, and a rabbi, but no one has register to prove that he is a Hebrew. Beware of made-up religions!

Cult formation: disregarding Hebrew law and making up a different, non-genealogical religion

Contrarily, mere modern, immigrant proselytes who have no Hebrew patrilineal continuity and required, genealogical register cannot qualify genealogically even though they may contrive a non-Hebrew genealogical cult and rhetorically call themselves Jews. Nevertheless, calling themselves Jews, they can no more be Hebrews than those of the time of the converts of the provinces of Persia (Esther 9.27, 28), and later, Antiochus Epiphanes IV himself, who is thought to be a prototype of the anti-Christ.

15 And as touching the Jews, whom he had judged not worthy so much as to be buried, but to be cast out with their children to be devoured of the fowls and wild beasts, he would make them all equals to the citizens of Athens: 16 And the holy temple, which before he had spoiled, he would garnish with goodly gifts, and restore all the holy vessels with many more, and out of his own revenue defray the charges belonging to the sacrifices: 17 Yea, and that also he would become a Jew himself, and go through all the world that was inhabited, and declare the power of God. (KJV Apocrypha, 2 Mac 9.15-17).

As time passed after the leadership of Moses, Israel committed many marital inter-racial sins after the exile to Babylon. The people who had inter-married were rebuked and the law was restored with the Covenant of Ezra (Ezra 10.3). God has guided and reproved his people throughout history, and rejected those who were not truly his. Spiritual development has occurred through dispensations; for instance, the giving of the law and the making of covenants. Eventually the New Covenant dispensation began (Jeremiah 31.31) and is fulfilling now. However, beware, as the apostasy and tolerance of myth and fake-Jews of our time makes the nations more lawless, many of the former Christian, Japhethic (white) nations are being flooded with non-white migrants.

Former homogeneity and Japhethic hegemony has been lost due to cult race-mixing pseudo-philosophy

Not long after the Herzl movement, Russia was taken over with a Communist government and the United States had lost its country to a foreign enterprise through the Federal Reserve Bank. All things were working together for the elite, anti-Christians, and the Japhethic peoples lost their centuries-long, world-wide hegemony. (At one time, Americans and Europeans rightfully thought race was sacred.) Previous to the disasters, Karl Marx had promoted his faction. Through a bought, dinosaur-type media, and eating up the newspaper and air-wave competition, the global political emphasis sway waned from White racial genetics to anti-Christian religion (Herzl Matrilinealism) and racial diversity, a form of religious schizophrenia so to speak, over the last couple of centuries.

Genealogical-patrilineal descendancy of the Lord Jesus Christ

Yeshua hamashiach, Jesus the Anointed One or Salvation (Mt. 1.21), had patrilineal register (Mt. 1.16, Luke 3.23). Finite genealogies, and my current explanations may help you understand some things about Biblical, patrilineal lineage and genetics, and even the fulfillment of the prophecy of Moses concerning the one—like himself, “… like unto me”—to come (Dt. 18.15).

Moses ruled Israel by the direction of God. The genealogy of the Lord Jesus Christ is patrilineal—he had legitimate pedigree and register (Matthew 1.1-17, Luke 3.23-38). He fulfilled the prophecy of the coming of a prophet like Moses genealogically through a Hebrew tribe: “נָבִ֨יא מִקִּרְבְּךָ֤ מֵאַחֶ֙יךָ֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 18.15), “... may-ah-h'ay-h'ah”—my transliteration and translation, “… from out of your brethren” (Dt. 18.15). The Hebrew brethren were from continuous, patrilineal families who followed the tribal inheritance and genealogical command of God (Nu. 36.5-13).

Continuous—no breaks in the generations—genealogical-patrilineal succession is both a Written Torah (the Old Testament) genealogical and genetic (biological) requirement! Jesus Christ, although begotten of God and born of a woman met the requirement of the register (Ezra 2.61-63) and genealogical-patrilineal pedigree through Joseph’s adoption and birth of Mary. Non-Hebrew families (those without patrilineal Hebrew genealogy) were separated (Nehemiah 9.2, 13.3), and the tradition of Hebrew tribal supremacy stood in Israel until after 70 AD, when Titus dispersed the Hebrews.

Generational accounts that are not specifically identical but Scriptural

Matthew and Luke would probably note the patrilineal inheritance of Joseph as to comply with the law (Nu. 36.5-13), although their accounts may have at least Levirate differences. Equivalent tracing of uterine brothers may be very difficult. Thomas Aquinas has some good thoughts about the general subject. However, Levirate law and theological strategy must be taken in consideration of both genealogies of the two gospels, of which we can assume both not to be in exact historical order, but nevertheless to be correct (2 Timothy 2.15). Regardless, both synoptic genealogies lead to Joseph, who possessed patrilineal inheritance, obviously had required register, and was the husband of Mary, mother of our Lord.

Genealogical non-Hebrew rejects of the Ezra Congregation

Note the rejects at the congregation of Ezra could not meet the register requirements. The modern Jewish people are not Hebrew and do not possess these racial or genealogical qualities either. The state of Israel is currently in a process of transition, but the possibility of finding a person with proof of pedigree (documents of register) and of the Hebrew race is almost null. I do believe the Hebrews became extinct. It is genealogically (Nu. 36.5-13) impossible for a Hebrew tribal member to exist today. To erase any doubt, anyone claiming to be a Jew who has been in a cult that has followed any marriage code other than Nu. 36:5-13, such as matrilineal law (Herzl Matrilinealism) and inter-racial marrying, automatically exposes his error.

You could search the world as far as you want, but whatever descendant you may find, in order for that descendant without continuous, patrilineal-descendancy, subsequently having a broken genealogical chain, he or she could not meet the registry requirement of Ezra 2:61-63 and would not be able to qualify as a member of a former Hebrew tribe, similarly as the “Jewish” can't. His anti-continuous, patrilineal, DNA test could not prove it, his legacy and Hebrew-like mannerisms could not prove it.

Hypothetically, if a descendant did arise that could meet the requirement of the registry, it would disqualify and expose the fraudulent, Jewish of modern Israel because they don't have proof of register and can't obtain it. They would have to kill or hide him so that it would not stir up controversy to their matrilineal-Hebrew myth and they would be found not to be worthy genealogical heirs of Hebrew inheritance, thus deserving to be rejected as the those at the Ezra congregation. Thus, the people living in modern Israel don’t have an inheritance or right to live in Israel any more than the Palestinians do. Who is more unworthy, a Hebrew impostor or a person of another false religion!

Post-Titus dispersion and lost identity of the Hebrews

After the dispersion of Titus, the remaining anti-Christian Hebrew people lost their fundamental cohesiveness, having been forewarned (Joshua 23.13). Eventually a heretical and genocidal, matrilineal form of law became known among a factional and biblically fraudulent group known today as the “Jewish” (mere Gentiles with a customized, non-proof of register, partial-Hebrew religion), who uplift their bible-contradicting, “oral” Torah commentary as religious authority. They are not a Hebrew people due to desecrating genealogical law, nor are their genealogy-defying, God-in-the-flesh-denying and Jesus-denying factions and groups that even say they approve of only the written Torah. Regardless of their spiritual failures, they cannot make their rejected, anti-genealogical (Nu. 36.5-13), biological pedigree (lacking continuous patrilineal descendancy) meet the requirement of the register (Ezra 2.61-63).

Myth and powerful lobbies

They call those who oppose their mythological and made-up religion anti-Semites, and financially and politically have pressured nations and their leaders to follow their lies and evil desires.

Female exceptions to the patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13, KJV), but not male

Some non-Hebrew women were tolerated to be patrilineal wives in ancient Israel, but a woman married to a non-Hebrew (there are no Hebrews anywhere in the world today) man could not have an inheritance in Israel. Of course, the genealogical law was strictly kept after Ezra, the Maccabees, and early Christians, but the modern “Jewish” (a different people than ancient Israel, having a broken genealogical chain) cannot meet nor follow those requirements. That is why they merely “occupy” but are not and never will be able to be legitimate heirs of the land. Contrarily, they seem to be the rise of the anti-Christian elite and have developed a platform for a false and non-Hebrew messiah: their false and devised (Dt. 4.2) religion eschatologically tramples over faith of the firstfruits (James 1.1) and the fulfillment of the early church.

Mere Jewish, written Torah circumvention: evasion of the truth and tribal integrity

The Joos, a name that seems more appropriate to me and does not defraud the patrilineal, patriarchs and tribal integrity (Nu. 35.5-13), are very deceptive as to genealogy. As impostors, some misconstrue a reference of Deuteronomy 7:3, 4 as a defense to their lack of patrilineal pedigree and mandated (Ezra 2.61-63) register. However, those verses (Dt. 7.3, 4) are not verses specifically having to do with inheritance: “נַחֲלָה֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Nu. 36.7). I read it in the Hebrew from right to left and then give my transliteration to English from left to right, “na ha la'”.

As cult proselytes, similar but not as faithful as the Persian converts in Esther as to adopting another religion without attempting to change its tribal inheritance rules, and not having patrilineal descendancy like the Maccabees—many of them with Polish and other Gentile, genealogical backgrounds—they use distortion of the biblical genealogical rules to promote their irreligion. Herzl Matrilinealism is far different than Old Testament Judaism and the Hebrew religion before the New Testament. We can confirm that the Maccabees were Hebrew due to the fact they could officially offer sacrifices because they were in patrilineal tribal succession (“son of”). They were relatives of a member of the priesthood, v. 1, “… the son of Simeon, a priest of the sons of Joarib, from Jerusalem… ” (KJV Apocrypha, 1 Maccabees 2.1-4).

The “Jewish” sinful (Gal. 5.21), Purim drunkenness ritual is a great but relatively minor example of a violation of the written Torah compared to making up a matrilineal law that contradicts Nu. 36:5-13 and other patrilineal requirements.

Circumcision (Acts 15) and merely keeping just some of the ancient laws can’t make a person a Hebrew or Jew

There are infinite ways to circumvent the truth. Satan is a master at it. Circumcision was a criterion to consider for the ancient Jew. The “Jewish”, similarly as the proselytes of Esther, may observe a facade of Old Testament practices and this cutting operation, but that cannot make anyone of their cult a Hebrew or a Jew. Ritual cannot induce or change genealogy, genetics and biology so as to make a Polish Gentile a Jew and genealogical member of the ancient Hebrews.

Religious cult, not ancient Judaism

The modern “Jewish” have been Joodaized and followed a Talmudic cult, whereas Old Testament converts as the proselytes in Esther followed the true and patrilineal Hebrew religion at that time and were Judaized. The deciding criterion of a Hebrew tribal member is patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13), which if any of the ancestors of the modern Joos began with continuous, patrilineal law of the Hebrews, he and his posterity did not continue to follow it. The “Jewish” have collapsed genealogical chains (Ezra 2:61-63) at best and don’t have a Hebrew gene pool and register, and can't produce a Hebrew/Jew child. Hence, they are merely Herzl Matrilinealists.

Loss of genealogical, Hebrew identity

So, don't be deceived by all the modern government propaganda, biblical myth and circumvention. If any so-called “messianic Jews” were decent and on-target Christians, they would be glad to emphasize they came out of a false religion and cult. They would rejoice to call themselves a “Jewish” convert to Christianity and not misconstrue commanded genealogy law (Nu. 36.5-13), the effort of God, Moses, Ezra, Nehemiah and later great men of God but now genealogically extinct, faithful Hebrews and Jews.

The Covenant of Ezra

Ezra acted in fear of the commandment of the Lord and according to the Torah/law (Ezra 10.3), not his own agenda. Numbers 36:5-13 was the law pertaining to such matters of genealogy, tribal integrity and inheritance. A covenant was made. The faithful put away their non-Hebrew, illegitimate wives and children. “Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law.” (Ezra 10.3) “All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children.” (KJV Apocrypha, 1 Esdras 9.36).

Pollution of Hebrew genealogy and race: loss of inheritance and ministerial privileges

Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy and register, and the children of the occupiers of the land are no more eligible than those that were accounted “… as polluted, put from the priesthood” at the time of Ezra. (Ezra 2.62). According to my translation, they were deposed due to desecration: “יְגֹאֲל֖וּ” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62), which I transliterate as, “yegoah l'u”. They cannot produce a Hebrew messiah, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession (Matthew 1.1-17). The made-up matrilineal law of the “Jewish” can’t suffice and is 180 degrees from the required patrilineal law of Nu. 36:5-13.

Faith, patrilineal, genealogical, tribal integrity and fulfillment of the law

Let us abide in faith of the Lord Jesus Christ (Yeshua hamashiach) with respect to the requirement of Hebrew registry (Ezra 2.61-63, Mt 1.1-17, Luke 3.23-38). The author of the book of Ruth reveals to us its importance as to remembrance of patrilineal law: chapter 4, verses 18-22; so do other Hebrew genealogies within the Scriptures.

                                      Works Cited: Chapter I-IX

“Democracy, n.” The Oxford Universal Dictionary, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1955.

“Ex-pool attendant details relationship with Falwells”, YouTube, uploaded by, CNN, Aug. 29, 2020,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXUgE4sEAXI&t=15s. 09:13

“Ezekiel 38 Genetics and Genealogy Study: Henry Gruver's Implied Biological Misinference”,

YouTube, uploaded by, hesedken, Oct. 3, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watchv=iYQHljg1GjU. 0:40

“Fornication And Adultery Difference”, YouTube, uploaded by, hesedken, Oct. 15, 2025,

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/o2l39tM-CoU. 02:03

“Is Pat Robertson a false prophet? 'Mitt Romney will win the presidential election!'”, YouTube,

uploaded by, Larry Robinson, Nov. 9, 2012,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6xBo9EijIQ&t=73s. 1:30

“Israel in the New Testament - Part 1 – Matthew”, YouTube, uploaded by David Pawson

Official, 18 Feb. 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf8SukPc-a8. 1:03:33

“The 10 Lost Tribes Of Israel Explained”, YouTube,

uploaded by, The 700 Club, Apr. 5, 2024,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dGBs6g8GrU&t=2s. 2:25

Billings, Kenneth W. "Heresy Letter-pg 11", hesedken,

www.hesedken.com/clubsite/heres-11.html, Accessed 14 Jun. 2026.

Brenton, Lancelot C. L. The Septuagint Version of the Old Testament. Published in 1982 by

Zondervan, 1971.

Copeland, Kenneth, “Delight in the Good Life”, Kenneth Copeland Ministries, kcm.org,

Accessed on Jan. 18, 2013, https://www.kcm.org/real-help/article/delight-good-life

Duduman, Dumitru. “The Message For America”, Dreams and Visions From God , Hand of

Help, Inc., 1996 (First edition listed as 1994) Michael Boldea, Hand of Help Ministries

handofhelp.com, https://handofhelp.com/vision_1.php

Accessed Apr., 12, 2026

Farnsworth, Lawrence A. Dictators and Democrats. 1941, p. 68. Quoted in “Benito Mussolini,

Wikiquote, 15 Nov. 2008, en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini.

Hermas. The Shepherd of Hermas. Translated by J.B. Lightfoot, Early Christian Writings, 2001,

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/shepherd-lightfoot.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2013

State of Israel. Law of Return (Amendment No. 2), 5730-1970. Passed by the Knesset on

2nd Adar Bet, 5730 (10 Mar. 1970). Knesset,

main.knesset.gov.il/EN/about/history/documents/kns7_return_eng.pdf.

Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 3 [Aug. 21, 1858-Mar. 4,

1860]. Rutgers University Press, 1953. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections.

https://name.umdl.umich.edu/lincoln3 Accessed April 26, 2026.

Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Vol. 5 [Oct. 24, 1861-Dec. 12, 1862].

Rutgers University Press, 1953. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections,

quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln5. Accessed April 26, 2026.

Robertson, Pat. Answers to 200 of Life's Most Probing Questions. n.d.

The Apocrypha: King James Version. Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995, p. 1 Mac 2:1–4.

The Greek New Testament. Edited by Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort,

Harper & Brothers, 1881. Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University,

http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0031.tlg001.perseus-grc1, Accessed 4 April

2026.

The Holy Bible: King James Version. Electronic ed. of the 1769 edition of the 1611 Authorized

Version., Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1995.

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex: UXLC 2.5 (Build 27.6). Tanach.us Inc., Apr. 2026, tanach.us/.

Back To Source Page

Next chapter: https://hesedken.com/complete_book_by_chapters/chapter_4.xhtml

Free book page: https://hesedken.com/free_book.html

Alphabetical Index

A name that does not defraud the patriarchs       

As to genealogical integrity       

Joos        11

Antiochus Epiphanes IV wanted to become a Jew himself       

2 Mac 9.15-17        8

Cannot make a person a Hebrew       

Not necessary today (Acts 15)       

Circumcision        12

Not necessary today (Acts 15), shouldn't be performed       

Circumcision        12

commandments and judgments of the Lord (v.13)       

commanded by the hand of Moses       

Nu. 36.5-13        7

Continuous—no breaks in the generations—genealogical-patrilineal succession       

Ezra 2.61-63        9

converts of Persia: lacking Hebrew, patrilineal genealogy and register       

Esther 9.27, 28        8

Could not meet the register requirements       

cult Herzl Matrilinealists automatically expose genealogical error (Nu. 36.5-13)       

register        10

Covernant of Ezra       

Ezra 10.3        13

desecration of genealogical law       

Ezra 2.62        13

Ethiopian wife of Moses       

reproved his marriage later (Nu. 36:5-13)       

Nu. 12.1        7

faction and anti-Christianity       

Karl Marx        9

firstfruits       

James 1.1        11

followers of Hebrew, patrilineal law (Nu. 36:5-13)       

possessed patrilineal register       

1 Maccabees 2.1-4        12

following of rule of law (Nu. 36.5-13) and making of a covenant       

Ezra 10.3        7

forewarning of loss of fundamental cohesiveness       

fundamental cohesiveness        11

Joshua 23.13        11

fulfillment of the prophecy of Moses concerning the one—like himself, “… like unto me”—to come       

Dt. 18.15        9

Genealogical inheritance       

register required (Ezra 2:61-63)       

Whom the land of Israel belongs        6

Genealogies of Jesus Christ: He had Torah-required register       

Mt. 1.16, Luke 3.23        9

Government propaganda       

Anti-Christian greater Israel pursuit       

biblical myth and circumvention        12

have no Hebrew register, inheritance, and cannot serve in the priesthood       

Herzl Matrilinealists        8

let us respect genealogical law       

remembrance       

Mt 1.1-17        13

must have continuous, patrilineal-descendancy       

not a broken genealogical chain       

Ezra 2:61-63        10

nahala... inheritance       

citation       

Nu. 36.7        11

patrilineal inheritance due to kinsman redeemer law       

Ruth's marriage        7

patrilineal inheritance of Joseph so as to comply with the law (Nu. 36.5-13)       

Levirate law and theological strategy... not to be in exact historical order, but nevertheless to be correct       

2 Timothy 2.15        10

penalty and loss of priesthood ministry due to failing genealogical register       

Not having proof of continuous Hebrew, patrilineal pedigree       

Ezra 2.61-63        8

Purim drunkenness       

"Jewish" ritual and violation of written Torah       

Gal. 5.21        12

restoration of the law       

some rejected due to lack of Hebrew, continuous genealogy       

Ezra 10.3        9

Scattering of the people into different lands       

divine segregation, racial and lingual exclusion, and institution of homogeneity       

Tower of Babel        7

ten lost tribes were found       

firstfruits       

James 1.1        6

the Maccabees recognized Hebrew, patrilineal law       

priesthood requirement       

1 Maccabees 2.1-4        7

thought to be a prototype of the anti-Christ       

Antiochus Epiphanes IV        8

Titus dispersed the Hebrews       

second temple was destoyed       

70 AD        10

"Jewish" people do not regard patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13)       

cult proselytes        12

Citations: Greek And Hebrew

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 18.15        9

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Nu. 36.7        11

Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62        13