[Part Two]

These O.T. laws are still theologically commendable and analogically useful concerning protection and provision of the heir. It should be realized that intra and interracial segregation has served God's purposes. These godly laws should not be overlooked or distorted so as to appease what is thought of as civil rights equality. "Equal" can not be construed in the sense of being "fair" if it defrauds or unduly deprives the descendants of the founders. Nor can forced mediocrity induce or substitute liberty--its inherent element of restriction and suppression defeats its purpose. Only removing such imposition (such as Affirmative Action) will allow free enterprise. Governmental super-imposed legalism derived from self-serving, defiant, human proposition can not replace or substitute Biblical and spiritual principles--it will never work. Old Testament laws should be honored, understood, used for guidance, exercised and implemented as a source for construing our federal and civil laws concerning provision of the heirs. (However, as many of us well know, our chaotic government has mocked God's laws (O.T. and NT.). It has rejected the virtue and responsibility of protection and provision for the heir in the recent decades.) It is fundamentally necessary and important to honor the promotion and inheritance rights of the descendants of those who established the nation. The re-instatement of segregation would be more socially moral and honorable than oppression of the heir through defiant and aggressive, anti-Biblical, countermeasures such as Affirmative Action and enforced non-segregation.

The Biblical law also warns us from marriage to an infidel. Naturally, we should want to marry within our own race. Any woman of a man's preference should be a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ and willing to respect her mate's race [in a mutually protective way concerning racial homogeneity]. Any of our own women should be taught to associate gregariously within only our race, and that it would be a disgrace to her people if she wanted to date outside of our race. These Biblical tenets should apply not only to the Anglo Saxon race, but there should be similar tenets among all races. Each race has its own natural dignity, and opportunity for Christian dignity through faith.

However, there is a reservation or exception to this general rule: Of course natural preference and power has its part in life. For instance, an extraordinarily beautiful woman may attract a man to marry outside of his race. [However, it must not be overlooked that homogeneity was established in Ezra. Concerning the antagonist's argument that after the Ezran covenant some Jews married into or descendants of less close tribes of Semitic families does not necessarily violate general racial homogeneity and Semitic genetic purity.] Nevertheless, the spiritual issue demands fulfillment before the natural desire; still, good advice requires that she should be a Christian (II Cor. 6:14-18). Similarly, government must fulfill its required duties (even though it may have many possible avenues) or else it can not achieve God's approval, and if it doesn't have God's approval, then wrath abides upon it.

The Apostle Paul had a godly concern about his own people, the Israelites (Rom. 9:1-5). It is a good thing for every person to care about his own race as well as the rest of the world. By the way, I want to emphasize that I am concerned about all peoples and both genders, and their spiritual welfare; it is from the love of God which He has given me. I also realize it is necessary for a Christian not to be high-minded, but to fear; and to continue in kindness (Rom. 11:20-22).

However, racial concerns--the contemplation of advantages and disadvantages of opposing parties--have been an impediment to social allegiance. Also, there is a natural satisfaction experienced among a contending and disputing less prestigious group when the downfall of a renowned and prominent group occurs. The word "discrimination" has aroused passion among opposing parties previously and still does today. It is a minority buzz word. Nevertheless, it should not have caused animosity, raging and physical injury among people as in the riots. Nor should it have threatened our justices to the point of changing their judgment, appeasing the riotous and abandoning the heir. However, that has not been the case. Politicians and justices were swayed by rioting, hate speech, dissent and media coverage to the point they departed from reasonable prudence and loyal foresight of administrative order and execution.

From a more profound viewpoint, though more subtle, I've noticed for years that Jews and Italians or one of the Islamic nations while living in this country have always looked unto their own benefit before the Anglo Saxon's. Of course, from a psychological point of view that is natural because people are naturally selfish, even though all of their selfishness may not always be ratified by the government. However, to the contrary, against the natural desire and responsibility of government provision and protection of its heir, the judicial system has unnaturally--corruptly--promulgated unnatural law through imposed special interest, chaotic confusion, not reason. Even before and especially now, if Anglo Saxons--the legal heirs of the nation, look unto their own benefit, even in the country their ancestors founded, the USA, the antagonistic word "prejudicism" or "racism" may pop up. The words are so powerful that they have become subversive. Notwithstanding, Biblical segregation is a commendable good tradition: please, for the truth's and your own sake, if not for the sake of others also, don't be duped, dissuaded or diverted through calumniating and wresting buzz words!

What do you think the people would say if you lived in Israel, Italy or Iran and you demanded economic preferential rights from them? Or if you imposed your desire to control busing for their school children? Regulation and control belongs to the benefit of the heir--not the non-heir! If such non-heirs [from any other country than the USA] are so zealous and faithful about such promotions, why don't they go to the country of their nationality and cultivate legislation there to that effect? But if they do not want to do that, then they should not want to overbearingly impose such exaggeration upon the USA and its heirs. I hope in the future loyalty to the heir is in the essence of reversing laws so as to provide for the descendants of the founders once again, but even if treachery prevails, we should not be naive--at least we should know about the dissenting and treasonous nature of the ones who perverted and subverted (changed) our national laws and caused greater disunity, recognizing that they bear their guilt. [Those of the races (or people) mentioned or others who concede or promote this US inheritance precept are appreciated.]

There are two types of discrimination: justifiable discrimination and unjustifiable! God is the only just one; therefore, His word, the Holy Bible, is the only authority concerning justice in all aspects of wisdom (Pr. 8:15) and philosophy. However, mercy gifts would be appropriate for the disadvantaged, not civil laws that increase the disadvantaged one and deprive the duly entitled one--a self-interest and desovereignization scheme not so slight so as to distort altruism, nor so arrogant as to totally repress the heir, but dictatorially efficacious so as to depreciate his inheritance. When inheritance policy is philosophically concentric with godly doctrine in respect to taking care of one's own first, whether it be a nation, family or individual, then a civil foundation for justice may be established.

Many of the heirs in this country are jobless. Many are dejected from rejection as to honorable opportunities due to the Affirmative Action anti-favorable apportionment against us. Some are homeless. By the way, at one time from a Biblical standpoint, slavery existed in a form of employment by choice--a personal business adventure (Dt. 15:16, 17); however, even though slavery does not exist in the USA, at least by that term today, contrary to their will, many of the heirs are enslaved to the residue of opportunities left by the beneficiaries of Affirmative Action, and the cruelties of reverse discrimination. According to Dt. 15:12-18, a brother slave was to be set free in the seventh year unless he requested to keep his service. Therefore, the USA should set the descendants of its founders free and abolish Affirmative Action--it has been much more than six years!

(continue)

Scripture List and other references

demise.html (Part One)