Brett Kavanaugh Wife Purity Test
(Conflict of Virgins)

A woman's purity is not only judged by her virginity and chastity, but also by her husband's purity. If a man defiles a woman, he becomes defiled or obligated himself, and if he marries a different woman, even if she is a virgin, the woman still inherits the impurity or responsibility of the husband's obligation to another woman.

Was Brett Kavanaugh impure or obligated before he married is the question, and how his wife's measure of purity or defilement may stand according to his former conduct. Take the KayyPeaa case to answer these questions: The issues are discussed.

KayyPeaa replied:

I absolutely think virginity matters. If the guy I end up deciding to marry isn't one, we can work through that, but it messes up females minds so much though, because in this super intimate moment where so many insecurities are exposed, you can't help but know that you are being compared to some past love. It's daunting. I personally have decided to stay a virgin until marriage. I made a video (click on my channel to see) to do with that because I have gotten so many negative responses.

Female virgins are wonderful women who can offer chastity to a man, a requirement for marriage. However, some female virgins are more wise than others. A virgin female can still end up in an unwanted situation by aiding her want-to-be-husband male to promote fornication (I Cor. 7:2) through former negligent conduct if she does not qualify his background. The parent or guardian of the female is responsible to have a trust relationship with his daughter so as to be able to give her to a man in faith, knowing she is chaste.

However, the parent of the virgin is not as likely to have this trust relationship with the male she is to be given to. There are men who may not be legally married but have in their life time had sex with a female virgin. In these cases, the male would still be obligated to the first female virgin, especially if he had two or more female virgin experiences, whom he joined in coitus. Then, the delusional, male presumed groom-to-be really should be trying to resolve his responsibility with his first virgin and her chastity (to re-unite and legally marry as long as the female had not become defiled by another man), and realize he must remain single if he doesn't in order to prevent an illegitimate marriage with another female.

We live in the apostasy and have lost the great protection of dowry and community living (homogeneous conditions), which guarded marriage (monogamy) and other Biblical institutions.

So if a virgin female thinks everything is alright concerning marriage merely due to her own sexual purity, she better beware because she also has a responsibility not to become intrusive to a once-virgin seeking chastity and marital restoration with the presumptuously presumed groom-to-be of the present virgin.

Another hypothetical situation to think about, having no interference to restoration as the former case, is the male who has legally but not legitimately married according to the Bible. If the male who has never had sex with a female virgin or chaste widow but knew (committed fornication or adultery) and married an unchaste woman or whore (1 Cor. 6:15) and then after righteous consideration decides to legally divorce (annul), and wants to marry a virgin, I don't see that the male would be obligated to the unchaste woman (Dt. 22:20, 21). However, as Kayypeaa said, it really would be a matter to mess up the mind of the female virgin, and she would be putting herself in a position to be compared with a past sexual love of the male.

Women in the Old Testament were wives of polygamous men and had to think about the competitor wives of their husband. However, polygamy was replaced with monogamy in the New Testament. Hopefully, more males will be concerned about purity and keep their virginity. It would be great if the female virgins had a great number of males to be given (parental authority) to without having to worry about former male sex activity.

More details...