"While I was at the hotel to-day, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for us to get along without making either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men. I recollect of but one distinguished instance that I ever heard of so frequently as to be entirely satisfied of its correctness—and that is the case of Judge Douglas's old friend Col. Richard M. Johnson. I will also add to the remarks I have made (for I am not going to enter at large upon this subject), that I have never had the least apprehension that I or my friends would marry negroes if there was no law to keep them from it; but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be in great apprehension that they might, if there were no law to keep them from it, I give him the most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes. I will add one further word, which is this: that I do not understand that there is any place where an alteration of the social and political relations of the negro and the white man can be made except in the State Legislature—not in the Congress of the United States—and as I do not really apprehend the approach of any such thing myself, and as Judge Douglas seems to be in constant horror that some such danger is rapidly approaching, I propose as the best means to prevent it that the Judge be kept at home and placed in the State Legislature to fight the measure. I do not propose dwelling longer at this time on this subject."

The above excerpt was found at the following link at founding.com: Founders' Library: Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at Charleston, September 18, 1858

Our comment: From the brief words in the excerpt, considering Lincoln showed morality as to separation, he evidently lacked the biblical foresight, apprehension, leadership character and urgency so as to amicably expedite a successful and complete sectorization if not deportation program (see Ezra 10 ) for blacks among his contemporaries; however, he worked on it.

Generally, the South's view, although it was not without its faults, was more correct than the North's concerning the issues leading to the Civil War. Since war and military action is not the proper response to settle issues among any nation, Lincoln made a mistake by jeopardizing political fidelity and imposing a humanistic approach (not necessarily biblical) upon the people of the young nation. For instance, if he had opposed a civil violation or unreasonable disallowance of the freedom of the Christian slave or after a designated time period (or abuse concerning some biblical statute principle), he would have had a legitimate cause to press his notion among a Christianity-spreading people; however, to force his own dogmatic proposition without sufficient or accurate Scriptural support was a grievous risk upon the constitutional foundation. As a general rule, humanism, or politics without God, manifested especially as conflicting with Scripture or Christian direction, causes more problems down the road than it is worth.

Slavery was an established form of labor throughout history. As a matter in fact, some slaves were even so by choice, not only by the will of the master.

When Lincoln usurped the abolishment of slavery (generally for black people and other non-white races), he caused an anti-black-race-slavery evolution, in effect a white-race-abdication evolution, to occur. Consequently, and reversibly, now, the whites are increasingly being led under captivity to a definite degree. The toleration of the Jewish in our politics and finance system, the Truman integration policy, Kennedy civil rights acts and later, Affirmative Action, threw salt on the sore of the affliction and calamity upon white people. What Lincoln presumptuously and recklessly proposed to achieve became the noose of his heirs. Oppressive, forced, integration lawlessnesses such as busing and especially housing have threatened the Nordish race upon the brink of genocide. Many of Lincoln's partial heirs, mulattoes, will never enjoy genetic purity because of the miscegenation catastrophe due to diversity association and the resulting infamous contact, much less the heirs the opportunity of white-race social, economic and labor freedom unless there is reversal or neutralization of the present bondage.

On the other hand, Lincoln's colonization issue was appropriate. However, his abrupt, super-imposing, sweeping, at least semi-national, emancipation proposal was unjustified. A failure. It was a forcefully inappropriate concept of reconstruction, unacceptable and opposed among almost half of the nation. It was not convincing due to errant, dogma in some parts and its totality. The premise of his political issue, although he portrayed it as a religious issue also, was not fully nor adequately founded upon a biblical basis. Hence, he could not diplomatically persuade his cause. He threw a progressing government into strife, division and war. It caused an unnecessary catastrophe. How many lives could have been saved and so much affliction been avoided if he had aggressively performed the former goal and re-thought the latter!

Now, his clear, contemporary, desire for anti-miscegenation and separation, but with present and later, ill-advised, feckless and liberal (anti-conservative) expression of rash, regional emancipation, distorted the public concept of labor ethics and racial, protective isolation. It also foolhardily jeopardized the powers of the state (although he admitted he had no apprehension of such disaster opens the question of Lincoln's honesty) with those of the federal government--a very important constitutional issue. This humanistic, divergence has been oppressively and further misused by current immoral, subversive, and enemy politicians who gratefully mock heir fidelity in our homeland. It just proves the point that if a leader is not aggressive in instituting law (sectorization law in this case; he had previously declared his favor for whites to possess racial dominance, "superior position"), his seemingly friends, treacherous as they may be, and adversaries are quick to promote lawlessness and their own calamitous and ruinous desires in its place. Such are those who have subverted the political power of the USA, even though unconstitutionally and factionally, and consequently have used this subversive political power to vex and defile other Nordish lands throughout the world.

Another thing, if Lincoln had colonized the free slaves and left it at that, the remaining slaves may have had an opportunity to eventually be colonized also after earning their freedom. This would have been a much more mild and less rash way of relieving slaves and not reversibly endangering the slave-owner or the non-slave-owner of his constitutional rights. Political usurpers are not usually so gracious.

So what can we do about this tragedy?

First of all, it is the duty of white citizens to unite and pull their children from public schools and places where the diversity lawlessness can ruin them. Re-establishing the constitution is secondary. The home must be built on biblical morality regardless of political help or conflict. It is our desire for the inner man to thrive and his social environment through that. Our race needs to be de-brainwashed first before attempting to gain the numbers needed to fight a political battle. Many of our people have been so subverted that they don't have the understanding of separation as Lincoln comprehended. Furthermore, due to this subversion, we have lost the immediate political power to do something  about it gregariously in large numbers and geographically.

Another thing, not only is there a physical and social difference as Mr. Lincoln mentioned, but the statistics of hate crime should be recognized. Let our families realize the need to live in our own communities for the reason of safety also.

Other Thoughts on Anti-miscegenation and the Contradicting Hate of Those Who Speak Against Hate

Martin Luther King Jr.: Interesting site found on internet [Beware: Foul Language] Video

The Black Paradox

VIDEO: TRIBAL HOMOGENEITY AND ANTIMISCEGENATION

Josephus: Nature of Seed, Animals and Men

Jewish Crime: Promoters of Subversion and Hostility

Will power: a requirement for the struggle of promoting purity

Were America's founding fathers anti-Semites?

Consider the difference in thought and issues of the modern and early politician

A way to establish equality

Rescinding Order No. 11: Further evidence of Lincoln's contra-speaking (two tongues as the Indian may say) and immaturity so as to abdicate white rule, and failure to understand that the synagogue of Satan and Christianity can't successfully mix More...

Not so Mr. Whitehead!

Office

Advance the education of our advocates ...

The American lie we are forced to live with:

The Black Paradox

Personal view