"LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN: It will be very difficult for an
audience so large as this to hear distinctly what
a speaker says, and consequently it is important
that as profound silence be preserved as
possible. "While
I was at the hotel to-day, an elderly gentleman
called upon me to know whether I was really in
favor of producing a perfect equality between the
negroes and white people. While I had not
proposed to myself on this occasion to say much
on that subject, yet as the question was asked me
I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in
saying something in regard to it. I will say then
that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of
bringing about in any way the social and
political equality of the white and black
racesthat I am not nor ever have been in
favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor
of qualifying them to hold office, nor to
intermarry with white people; and I will say in
addition to this that there is a physical
difference between the white and black races
which I believe will forever forbid the two races
living together on terms of social and political
equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live,
while they do remain together there must be the
position of superior and inferior, and I as much
as any other man am in favor of having the
superior position assigned to the white race. I
say upon this occasion I do not perceive that
because the white man is to have the superior
position the negro should be denied every thing.
I do not understand that because I do not want a
negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want
her for a wife. My understanding is that I can
just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year,
and I certainly never have had a black woman for
either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite
possible for us to get along without making
either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to
this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a
man, woman or child who was in favor of producing
a perfect equality, social and political, between
negroes and white men. I recollect of but one
distinguished instance that I ever heard of so
frequently as to be entirely satisfied of its
correctnessand that is the case of Judge
Douglas's old friend Col. Richard M. Johnson. I
will also add to the remarks I have made (for I
am not going to enter at large upon this
subject), that I have never had the least
apprehension that I or my friends would marry
negroes if there was no law to keep them from it;
but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be
in great apprehension that they might, if there
were no law to keep them from it, I give him the
most solemn pledge that I will to the very last
stand by the law of this State, which forbids the
marrying of white people with negroes. I will add
one further word, which is this: that I do not
understand that there is any place where an
alteration of the social and political relations
of the negro and the white man can be made except
in the State Legislaturenot in the Congress
of the United Statesand as I do not really
apprehend the approach of any such thing myself,
and as Judge Douglas seems to be in constant
horror that some such danger is rapidly
approaching, I propose as the best means to
prevent it that the Judge be kept at home and
placed in the State Legislature to fight the
measure. I do not propose dwelling longer at this
time on this subject."
The above excerpt was found at the following
link at founding.com: Founders'
Library: Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at
Charleston, September 18, 1858
Our comment: From the
brief words in the excerpt, considering Lincoln
showed morality as to separation, he evidently
lacked the biblical
foresight,
apprehension, leadership character and urgency so
as to amicably expedite a successful and complete
sectorization if not deportation program (see Ezra 10 ) for blacks among his
contemporaries; however, he worked on it.
Generally, the South's
view, although it was not without its faults, was
more correct than the North's concerning the
issues leading to the Civil War. Since war and
military action is not the proper
response to
settle issues among any nation, Lincoln made a
mistake by jeopardizing political fidelity and
imposing a humanistic approach (not necessarily
biblical) upon the people of the young nation.
For instance, if he had opposed a civil violation
or unreasonable disallowance of the freedom of
the Christian slave or after a designated time
period (or abuse concerning some biblical
statute principle),
he would have had a legitimate cause to press his
notion among a Christianity-spreading people;
however, to force his own dogmatic proposition
without sufficient or accurate Scriptural support
was a grievous risk upon the constitutional foundation. As a general rule, humanism, or
politics
without God,
manifested especially as conflicting with
Scripture or Christian direction, causes more
problems down the road than it is worth.
Slavery was an established form of labor
throughout history. As a matter in fact, some
slaves were even so by choice, not only by the
will of the master.
When Lincoln usurped the
abolishment of slavery (generally for black
people and other non-white races), he caused an
anti-black-race-slavery evolution, in effect a
white-race-abdication evolution, to occur.
Consequently, and reversibly, now, the whites are
increasingly being led under captivity to a definite degree. The toleration of the Jewish in our politics and
finance system, the Truman integration policy, Kennedy civil rights acts and later,
Affirmative Action, threw salt on the sore of the
affliction and calamity upon white people. What
Lincoln presumptuously and recklessly proposed to
achieve became the noose of his heirs.
Oppressive, forced, integration lawlessnesses
such as busing and especially housing have
threatened the Nordish race upon the brink of
genocide. Many of Lincoln's partial heirs,
mulattoes, will never enjoy genetic purity
because of the miscegenation catastrophe due to
diversity association and the resulting infamous
contact, much less the heirs the opportunity of
white-race social, economic and labor freedom
unless there is reversal or neutralization of the
present bondage.
On the other hand,
Lincoln's colonization issue was appropriate. However,
his abrupt, super-imposing, sweeping, at least
semi-national, emancipation proposal was
unjustified. A failure. It was a forcefully
inappropriate concept of reconstruction,
unacceptable and opposed among almost half of the
nation. It was not convincing due to errant,
dogma in some parts and its totality. The premise
of his political issue, although he portrayed it
as a religious issue also, was not fully nor
adequately founded upon a biblical basis. Hence,
he could not diplomatically persuade his cause.
He threw a progressing government into strife,
division and war. It caused an unnecessary
catastrophe. How many lives could have been saved
and so much affliction been avoided if he had
aggressively performed the former goal and
re-thought the latter!
Now, his clear,
contemporary, desire for anti-miscegenation and
separation, but with present and later,
ill-advised, feckless and liberal
(anti-conservative) expression of rash, regional
emancipation, distorted the public concept of
labor ethics and racial, protective isolation. It
also foolhardily jeopardized the powers of the
state (although he admitted he had no
apprehension of such disaster opens the question
of Lincoln's honesty) with those of the federal
government--a very important constitutional
issue. This humanistic, divergence has been
oppressively and further misused by current
immoral, subversive, and enemy politicians who
gratefully mock heir fidelity in our homeland. It
just proves the point that if a leader is not
aggressive in instituting law (sectorization law
in this case; he had previously declared his
favor for whites to possess racial dominance,
"superior position"), his seemingly
friends, treacherous as they may be, and
adversaries are quick to promote lawlessness and
their own calamitous and ruinous desires in its
place. Such are those who have subverted the
political power of the USA, even though
unconstitutionally and factionally, and
consequently have used this subversive political
power to vex and defile other Nordish lands
throughout the world.
Another thing, if
Lincoln had colonized the free slaves and left it
at that, the remaining slaves may have had an
opportunity to eventually be colonized also after
earning their freedom. This would have been a
much more mild and less rash way of relieving
slaves and not reversibly endangering the
slave-owner or the non-slave-owner of his
constitutional rights. Political usurpers are not
usually so gracious.
So what can we do about
this tragedy?
First of all, it is the
duty of white citizens to unite and pull their
children from public
schools and
places where the diversity
lawlessness can
ruin them. Re-establishing the constitution is
secondary. The home must be built on biblical
morality regardless of political help or
conflict. It is our desire for the inner man to
thrive and his social environment through that.
Our race needs to be de-brainwashed first before
attempting to gain the numbers needed to fight a
political battle. Many of our people have been so
subverted that they don't have the understanding
of separation as Lincoln comprehended.
Furthermore, due to this subversion, we have lost
the immediate political power to do something
about it gregariously in large numbers and
geographically.
Another thing, not only
is there a physical and social difference as Mr.
Lincoln mentioned, but the statistics of hate
crime should be recognized. Let our families
realize the need to live in our own communities
for the reason of safety also.
Other Thoughts on
Anti-miscegenation and the Contradicting Hate of
Those Who Speak Against Hate
Martin Luther King Jr.: Interesting site found on internet [Beware: Foul Language] Video
The Black
Paradox
VIDEO:
TRIBAL
HOMOGENEITY AND ANTIMISCEGENATION
Josephus:
Nature of Seed, Animals and Men
Jewish Crime:
Promoters of Subversion and Hostility
Will
power: a requirement for the struggle of
promoting purity
Were
America's founding fathers anti-Semites?
Consider
the difference in thought and issues of the
modern and early politician
A way to
establish equality
Rescinding
Order No. 11: Further evidence of Lincoln's
contra-speaking (two tongues as the Indian may
say) and immaturity so as to abdicate white rule,
and failure to understand that the synagogue of
Satan and Christianity can't successfully mix More...
Not so Mr.
Whitehead!
Office
Advance
the education of our advocates ...
The
American lie we are forced to live with:
The Black
Paradox
Personal
view
|