NON-HEBREW RETURN CAN ONLY BE FAKE AND RECENT

Shame on TBN: The Jewish Are Fake And Have No Patrilineal Hebrew Identity: They Are No More Patrilineal Hebrew Than Watchtower Or Islamic People

Aliyah: The Jewish People's Return to Israel | Insights on TBN Israel
Aug 17, 2022, TBN Israel

Jewish genealogical-genetic identity omission: fakeness/disingenuity

“But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.” (KJV, Gn. 17.21) If you will notice throughout the Old Testament, the lineage of Abraham was patrilineal, not matrilineal. If it were matrilineal, could not have Hagar, the mother of Ishmael, claimed her son as “Abrahamic” and part of the covenant? Similarly, the non-Hebrew “Jewish” of our day claim to be part of a covenant through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but they do not have genealogical-genetic credentials to agree with that. They claim their Jewishness from strange women who bore them: some Semitic, some Japhethic, some Hamitic and some mixed but none of them are Hebrew, the designated people of the covenant (Gn. 17.2).

Even before the law of Moses, God had established the moral of racial exclusion and the institution of homogeneity among the nations at the Tower of Babel and eventually at the separation of Ishmael, which implemented the calling of the people of God through Isaac. Intra-racial marriage and dispensational fulfillment: 

Inheritance through the father's name

Moses, who did not marry a Hebrew, later in Nu. 36 commanded the children of Israel to follow strict patrilineal rules on both sides (male and female) of the marriage intra-tribally; formerly, he had not even followed these rules in his own marriage. Also Ruth's marriage was not the norm and deviated on the matrilineal side even after the law (Nu. 36.5-13) was given. However, significantly, her marriage was patrilineal on Boaz's (her husband) side and their posterity were considered heirs. As Ruth's descendants were not totally Hebrew, they lived against the norm of the commandment of Moses. Nevertheless, she and they obtained patrilineal inheritance through her husband. Jesus Christ similarly obtained patrilineal inheritance through encouragement of an angel and adoption of Joseph.

Disinheritance through the mother's name

The matrilineal law of the Herzlists (modern “Jewish”) cannot duplicate patrilineal law (Numbers 36.5-13) nor the principal of the kinsman redeemer, which adhered to patrilineal law. (Ruth 4.18-22) The modern “Jewish” women don't have patrilineal inheritance as Naomi. Nevertheless, Ruth received great grace through Boaz because she was not accepted by her kinsman redeemer who had first choice (Ruth 4.6) because of her progeny and being a Moabitic woman. Suffering worse consequences, the non-Hebrew women of Ezra 10 were totally rejected and put away. Today, modern Israel is occupied by the “Jewish”, a matrilineal and non-Hebrew people with no or long ago, collapsed Hebrew pedigrees, who have less credentials than the rejected of Ezra. They have no genealogical-genetic inheritance, and their religious culture (matrilineal succession) is in direct opposition to Moses and patrilineal law (Nu. 36.5-13), the covenant (Ezra 10.3) and the kinsman redeemer law. The “Jewish” can defraud, make themselves a cult and spread myth, but they can't make themselves Hebrews/Jews.

So, going back further, Abraham's succession was patrilineal through Isaac, Jacob and the genealogies we have in the Scripture. Genealogy and inheritance was never matrilineal in the Scriptures, including any part of the written torah. Abraham's descendancy was extended through King David of Israel: “Howbeit the LORD would not destroy the house of David, because of the covenant that he had made with David, and as he promised to give a light to him and to his sons for ever.” (KJV, 2 Chronicles 21.7)

Time progressed and Israel committed many marital inter-racial sins after the exile to Babylon. The people who had inter-married were rebuked and the law was restored with the Covenant of Ezra. The foreign women from Babylon who married the Hebrew men did not obtain an inheritance as Ruth did. God has guided with judgment and law, incrementally as to time, and reproved his people throughout history. Spiritual development has occurred through dispensations; for instance, the giving of the law and the making of covenants. (Romans 9.4-7) Eventually the New Covenant dispensation began with the Lord Jesus Christ and is fulfilling now.

At the time of Matthew there were Hebrew people, people who had patrilineal inheritance in Israel (Numbers 36.5-13), in Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim. There were twelve Hebrew tribes united after the time of Jesus Christ also. Even though there had been a former carrying-away by Assyria, all the faithful of the Hebrew tribes were brought together through the light of Jesus Christ. (James 1.1)

Today, you can't find any Hebrews anywhere. It is because they most likely became totally extinct. Science, genealogy and theology work together. You must understand genealogical-genetics in order to understand the bible. It is very important. If you were to walk down a street in Jerusalem and ask 100 people if their father has patrilineal inheritance, I don't think you could find one that would tell you yes. You could ask a thousand and not find one. Besides not having a patrilineal culture, even if they tried to make one it could not be Hebrew, which requires no genealogical, generational collapse such as the sons of Barzillai (Ezra 2.61-63) suffered.

So, there are no known Hebrews. We can know this especially by understanding the required genealogy of the Torah. Herzl matrilinealism is not justified by Ezra or Moses. Nehemiah separated Hebrews from non-Hebrews (people who did not have patrilineal inheritance). Hypothetically, such deviate, matrilinealism of modern Israel would be an algorithm for Hebrew genocide; it is an assault against Nu. 36:5-13. So, what happened to the people (non-Hebrews and anti-Hebrews) falsely claiming to be Jews and living in Israel today is the fault of their ancestors. Their defense of calling people “racist” and misusing the buzzword “anti-Semitic” for exposing their genealogical deficiency has a lot of leaks—it is a bucket with too many holes in it and can't hold water.

Christian eschatology and theology

Praise God for the chronologies we have in the Bible. Matthew and Luke confirm patrilineal genealogy and the Christian messiah. The NT gives us knowledge of the restored, genealogical, twelve tribes in Christ. (James 1.1) The miracles and works of Jesus Christ prove himself to be the prophet Moses spoke about (Dt. 18.15).

Rejection of families with collapsed genealogy

Ezra 2.62 requires a priest to have patrilineal genealogical records, which of course no modern “Jewish” person has. They are genealogically more distant than the Gileadites (Ezra. 2.61).

61 And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name: 62 These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood. (KJV, Ezra 61-62)

If the modern, non-Hebrew “Jewish” claim they are Jews, they must prove they have Hebrew genealogical credentials. They cannot do that because the Hebrews have become extinct. They can never claim they have a legitimate priest, one who is not biblically considered “polluted” (Ezra 2.62).

The Greek Septuagint has much older translations of the Hebrew Scripture in their time than the Masoretic text. The NT was written not long after that. Every eclectic, Torah student must recognize the power of parallel languages to the Hebrew, especially Greek. Thank the one reverently called “Κύριε”, which I transliterate as “Ku'rie”—and translate it meaning, “Lord” (Brenton Septuagint, Ps. 6.2; Westcott and Hort, Matt. 14.28) for that!

Tetragrammaton

Christians call the Lord by his name, Jehovah. There is also a difference between having a religion as the “Jewish” and knowing God personally, which they don't. If they did, they would confess Jesus Christ and leave their cult.

Even the upright sometimes do not know the Lord. Samuel at one time did not know (I Sa. 3.7) the Lord, “יְהוָ֑ה” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Sa. 3.7), which I transliterate reading the Hebrew from right to left and then give my transliteration to English from left to right as, “yehovah” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Sa. 3.7), meaning from my understanding of transliterating in small letters and spelling in English beginning with a capital letter and then small letters afterward as “Jehovah” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Sa. 3.7) or “Lord”. My transliteration and spelling of the same word is not with all capitals as the KJV does in Ps. 83:18. Thus, from my prospective, my transliteration of the tetragrammaton of Ps. 83:19 (Tanach.us) is still equivalent to the transliteration “JEHOVAH” in Ps. 83:18 (KJV). Regardless, if you learn to know the Lord, if you revere him as to who he is, whether you spell his name with all capitals or just the beginning with a capital letter, you can understand Exodus 3:14, which is very important.

Christians know their Lord and say his name, “Jehovah”; the “Jewish”, a people who are not the same people as the ancient Hebrews, do not follow the genealogical laws of the Hebrews (Nu. 36.5-13) and do not know our savior. They also have a custom not to pronounce God’s name directly as we do. As a matter in fact, they are even irreverent toward genealogical register and Christianity—the only true religion. Jesus Christ fulfilled the coming of the Messiah, and he has genealogical credentials and register (Dt. 18.15, Mt. 1.16, Luke 3.23 ) to prove it.

Another name to recognize

The Phillistines did not know God but they called him “אֱלֹהֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:8), which I transliterate, “elohay yisrael” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:8), and translate, “God of Israel:” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:8). In verse 7, the men of Ashdod noted their god Dagon “דָּג֥וֹן אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:7), which I transliterate, “dagon elohay-nu” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:7) and translate “Dagon, our god” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, 1 Samuel 5:7) with the same word they used for the Hebrew God of Israel (v. 8), but there is a difference between a god and God.

God speaks as “אֱלֹהִים֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), which I transliterate as “elohim'” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14). The Hebrew word is used in a different grammatical form of the Hebrew word “God” than those explained in 1 Sa. 5:7-8 above and its spelling of the transliteration is a little different also.

The Greek OT. and NT texts are similar as to “I AM”

The two words, “I AM”, in the verse Ex. 3:14 (KJV) below, may be interpreted in a different tense by some, including myself, as “I SHALL BE” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), making the sentence according to the translation in those clauses: “I shall be who I shall be” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14).

“And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.” (KJV, Ex. 3.14)

Let’s look at the Hebrew verse Exodus 3:14 in the Tanach.us text:

“וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֔ה אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה וַיֹּ֗אמֶר כֹּ֤ה תֹאמַר֙ לִבְנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה שְׁלָחַ֥נִי אֲלֵיכֶֽם׃” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14)

I would paraphrase the Hebrew verse in the Tanach.us text, “And God said unto Moses, I Shall Be Who I Shall Be, and he said, thus you shall say unto the sons of Israel, I Shall Be sent me unto you”. (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14)

The word for “God” (KJV), the second word in the English sentence, is the same word as “אֱלֹהִים֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), according to my transliteration, “elohim'” in the Tanach.us text. Then further along in the verse, according to my paraphrastic language, God tells Moses to tell the sons of Israel, “I AM” (KJV) or “I Shall Be” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), my interpretation and transliteration, has sent me unto you. The Scripture differentiates God and his person of eternity according to different names: first through the verse as “elohim'” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), as I transliterate the word “God” and interpret in the Tanach.us text, and then when he, God himself, enlightens Moses, “אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14)—(e'heye'h, the last h silent)—“I AM” (KJV) or “I Shall Be” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), according to my interpretation and transliteration of the Tanach.us text.

The Greek Septuagint (LXX), an earlier book than the Hebrew, Masoretic text, is a little different as to Ex. 3.14. God says to Moses, “I am The One Who Is” (my trans.), or another way to interpret the verse, “I am The Being” (my trans.) according to my perception of the Greek text (Brenton Septuagint, Ex. 3.14). In the NT text, Jesus says, according to my interpretation and paraphrastic translation of the Greek text, “… before Abraham came into being, I AM” (Westcott and Hort, John 8.58). Both, the OT. Greek text (Brenton Septuagint, Ex. 3.14) and the NT Greek text (Westcott and Hort, John 8.58) have “ego eimi” (my transliteration), meaning “I am” (my trans.). Regardless, God is eternal: He was, He is, and He shall be. (Rev. 1.8)

God in two places at the same time

The person of God in two different places at the same time: unseen form (KJV, John 1.18) in heaven and corporeal form in earth: “LORD” (KJV, Gen. 18.1, Gen 19.24)

You can also understand Genesis 19:24-27, wherein “Jehovah”, which I transliterated and interpreted (above) from the Tanach.us text (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ex. 3.14), is equivalent to the word “Lord” in the verse 24 (KJV) text below. Either way you use the word from either text in Gen. 19:24 (KJV), the Lord is in two places at the same time:

²⁴ Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; ²⁵ And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. ²⁶ But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt. (KJV, Gen. 19.24-27)

Forms of God

God has been unseen in his highest form and corporeal in his flesh form. No one has ever seen Him in his highest form: “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.” (KJV, John 1.18)

The Lord can come in the flesh as he chooses. He spoke to Adam in the garden (Gen. 3.9). Adam and Eve's clothes of skin were made by him, “יְהוָ֨ה אֱלֹהִ֜ים” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 3.21), which I transliterate “yehova elohim” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 3.21), and translate “Lord God” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Gen. 3.21). He was the first leather designer. He clothed our progenitors.

God in corporeal form

Yeshua hamashiach (Jesus the Christ) is Lord. He is God in the corporeal form of the Son. He created the universe:

“¹⁴ In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: ¹⁵ Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: ¹⁶ For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: ¹⁷ And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” (KJV, Colossians 1.14-17)

Also, his genealogy is patrilineal—he had legitimate, continuous (no broken chain of patrilineal progenitors) pedigree and register (Matthew 1.1-17, Luke 3.23-38). He fulfilled the coming of a prophet like himself through a Hebrew tribe prophesied by Moses, “מֵאַחֶ֙יךָ֙” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 15.18), transliterated by me, “... may-ah-h'ay-h'ah”—meaning through my interpretation, “… from your brethren” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Dt. 18.15). This is mentioned in Acts 3:18-24 (KJV). There can be no other messiah to fulfill the prophecy of the one to come after Moses (Dt. 18.15) because the Hebrew tribes became extinct and the Hebrew patrilineal, genealogical chain is no longer existent. We know Jesus Christ came through the tribe of Judah. (Mt. 1.1-3, 21, KJV)

No excuses for the non-Hebrew who did not marry patrilineally

If the non-Hebrew Jewish claim they are Jews and make an excuse that Ruth was not Hebrew, their argument does not nullify the patrilineal rule. Ruth was blessed and an exception to the rule of Numbers 36:5-13. Through Boaz, nevertheless, her children obtained patrilineal succession—a necessity to be a Hebrew and have tribal/national inheritance.

She was an accepted Moabite even though women of other lands were not acceptable: "And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:" (Ne. 10.30) "Know for a certainty that the LORD your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the LORD your God hath given you." (Joshua 23.13) So, even though Ruth was blessed through the patrilineal law and Boaz, the non-Hebrew women that returned from Babylon did not receive such grace (Ezra 10).

In Ezra a covenant was made: The faithful put away their non-Hebrew, illegitimate wives and children. "Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law" (Ezra 10.3). "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children." (The King James Version Apocrypha, 1 Esdras 9.36)

The Talmud and “Jewish” Hebrew-replacement theology is a farce

Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy, and the children of the occupiers of the land are more mixed and far genealogically distant without register than those of the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai. The word, “יְגֹאֲל֖וּ” without the vav-conjunction “and” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62), which I respectively translate and transliterate as “they were polluted”,“yegoahlu” (Unicode/XML Leningrad Codex, Ezra 2.62), reveals even those once related to the priesthood were not considered clean due to miscegenation and the desecration of their pedigree and were unable to perform ceremonial work as a member of their former family. The modern “Jewish”, having no register and from two millennia of generations are much further from acceptable registration than the rejected ones of Ezra 2:62. They cannot produce a legitimate priest (cohen) and do not have a Hebrew, patrilineal gene pool. They can never regenerate one. Therefore, hypothetically and eschatologically, they are genealogically ineligible to produce a Hebrew messiah; nevertheless, they propose a messiah of their own that shall come. They ignore the prophet mentioned by Moses when he spoke to the Hebrews in Dt. 18: 15, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession and register (Mt. 1.16, Luke 3.23), something that their proposed messiah-to-come cannot have.

No, matrilineal law and the oral Torah is not sufficient. For instance, Yevamot 77b does not have the authority of the written torah. The Moabite rule did not apply only to men as some propose so as to accept female racial/tribal miscegenation: for at least one reason because that would contradict the commandment of Numbers 36:5-13, Nehemiah 10:30, the warning of Ezra 10:14, and the covenant and law (Ezra 10.3), which gave amicable expulsion to non-Hebrew women. Having said that, the oral torah is useful in some ways, but not all. It is inconsistent. It is contradictory at times. Some of the commentators may be wise and others not. Good doctrine cannot be established in a quantity of words of commentators who cannot agree with one another (50 volumes or so more than the bible); it must be established upon the authoritative, written Torah and fulfillment books—the Holy Bible.

Increase of knowledge, but myth and delusion still remains

We live in prophetic days and knowledge has increased, but so has myth and delusion. Nations and leaders have been deceived and mixed their peoples. The Balfour Declaration and the precluding delusion is evidence of it. Today, the USA gives huge amounts of money to a people without genealogical-genetic identity, and who are not a Hebrew people but foolishly assumes the myth that they are a blessed people of God! Will the non-Hebrew Jewish present a messiah of their own? Lord, have mercy on us. Amen.

Links:

Extinction Of The Hebrew Tribes

Samaritan Woman At The Well

Non-Hebrew Jewish Molestation Of Numbers 36:5-13

Why You Should Learn Greek: Don't Be Deceived

Ranks Of Racial Homogeneity

Tower Of Babel: Development Of Three Races

Japhethic Race And Noah's Blessing

Ruth

Numbers 36:5-13

Hebrew Patrilineal Succession Requirement

Singer Isaiah Misinterpretation

Warning To The Hebrews: Loss Of Their Posterity

Oral Torah Failure

Maimonides Incorporeal Heresy vs. 3 in 1

613 Miztvote Patrilineal Law Evasion

Ezekiel 38

Zabulon And The Land Of Nephthalim

The Big Jewish Myth (False Identity)

No Remnant Among The Non-Hebrew Jewish

One World Culture: Deception

War And Prophetic Times