|
Hebrew
Law: Dr. Brown and GRLA Both Circumvent the Criterion of Patrilineal Continuity of Hebrew
Descendancy: Dr. Brown bases his circumvention on Herzl Matrilinealist views and reasons why they call themselves Jews. There is no Santa Claus today nor are there any Jews/Hebrews. They became extinct. Christians must avoid being deceived by such a myth! |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Brown Debates: "Who are the Real Children of Israel?", ASKDrBrown, Mar 24, 2023
|
|
|
Links: Patrilineal Law: Continuity, Not Quantity: Nu. 36:5-13 Genetic And Genealogical Commentary: Unto The Romans Hebrew Genetics And Genealogy Requirements Jesus the Christ: Patrilineal Descendancy: Matthew 1 Christian Jews Were United After Christ's Death: James 1:1 The Jewish Are Like The Rejected Of Ezra 10 And The Samaritans Professor Sand: Jewish Invention Benjamin Freedman: The Jewish Are Not Hebrew And Have No Roots In Israel The Jewish fail Ezra 2:61, 62: Insufficient Genealogy Israeli Government Law: Law of Return (Amendment No. 2) 5730-1970 Kinsman Redeemer: Ruth And Christian Redemption |
It should be noted that if those among the Ezran Congregation were later to be designated as “Jews” (members of a Hebrew subrace), then to equally designate the descendants of those that were polluted and separated from the congregation also as “Jews” would be patriarchally defamatory and genetically fraudulent! Therefore, the modern “Jewish”, a people who have no recent, patrilineal genealogy, even less than the rejects of Ezra 10, are not genuine and worse, fraudulent. They should not call or designate themselves as the same people who expelled the hybrid rejects from the congregation. Furthermore, you can't be “Jewish”, no matter how much you deny Jesus Christ, and Christian at the same time! They are 180 degrees apart. The "Jewish" do not believe in Jesus Christ and Christians do. I recommend if you believe in Jesus Christ to consider calling yourself a Christian convert from a fraudulent, cult. Error Of Overlooking: Not Recognizing The Torah (Nu. 36:5-13) Notice at about one hour and thirty-six minutes that both the debater and Mr. Brown fail to realize and admit that Ezra acted according to the law (Ezra 10:3)--the Torah, not his own agenda. Ezra was referring to Numbers 36:5-13, the Hebrew law given by Moses concerning the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and antigenocide law. Judgment and a covenant was made: The faithful put away their non-Hebrew, illegitimate wives and children. "Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law" (Ezra 10:3). (See) 1 Esdras 9:36 "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children." (The King James Version Apocrypha). Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy, and the children of the occupiers of the land are as polluted (yegoahlu): Ezra 2: 61-63. The modern “Jewish” cannot produce a Hebrew messiah, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession (Matthew 1). The Herzl Matrilineal government law of Israel is not in accord with the patrilineal law of Moses. The “Jewish” actually molested (Dt. 4:2) the law from patrilineal gender significance to matrilineal: “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.” Race Is Real, Evolutionary And Genetic Richard McCulloch in his paper Race: Reality and Denial1 brilliantly pointed out that “[r]aces are geographically real.” Similar to Japhethic subraces, Hebrew subraces also existed, especially as to twelve distinct tribes. However, some inter-racial marriages did occur. Nevertheless, these are not intra-racial and sub-racial marriages as that of King David's great grandparents, Boaz and Ruth, who was a Moabitic (Semitic) woman. For instance, Ethiopians have a historical record of learning the Torah. They were familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures in their own language. Moses, a Hebrew man (Semitic), married a woman (Hamitic) of Ethiopia in the area he and the Hebrews sojourned. Abraham married Hagar, an Egyptian woman. Nevertheless, according to the unique, Hebrew patrilineal, genealogical law (Nu. 36: 5-13), which came about later, the Hebrew women (daughters of male, Hebrew men) were commanded to marry within their particular tribes (intra-racially, intra-tribally). This eventually failed to occur after the dispersion of Titus (70 AD); the women of the Hebrew tribes were exposed to inter-racial instead of intra-tribal marriage and the Hebrew progeny became lost. Even if their hybrid offspring inherited the Hebrew language, they were as mere Gentiles and never able to be patrilineally, genetically and genealogically restored. The Hebrews became extinct. |
|
|
|
|
|
1Race:
Reality and Denial,
By Richard McCulloch