|
|
|
|
|
Col. Richard Black: U.S. Leading World to Nuclear War, Apr 26, 2022, Schiller Institute
|
Americans need to know what this will truly cost: Tulsi Gabbard, May 16, 2022, Fox News
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russia Invasion Foretelling Siener van Rensburg... a significant time, if I remember correctly, he referred to was when the snow melts. |
|
|
|
PHILOSOPHY Ukraine Democracy: USA's Involvement In World Affairs One of the reasons the USA involved itself in Vietnam was to allow the people of Vietnam to have a democracy, or at least that was what was proposed by the American government. However, it lost that proposal and war to the Communists. Staying Out Of World-wide Democracy Promotion What does the USA think it can do for Ukraine as to the issue of staying democratic in spite of Russia's desire for Ukraine or at least some of its provinces to be under its Communist rule? The USA would have to throw out the idea of world-wide democratic advancement for other nations if it decides to stay out of the argument militarily because Ukraine cannot defend itself with American weapons as such it has now. The usual promotion of fighting for democracy would be waived and Ukraine would no longer have its freedom once conquered by Russia. Personally, I think the USA should stay out of the conflict militarily, other than providing Ukraine weapons that they purchase and put up the money and collateral: debt that cannot be repaid must be avoided. The USA should not be a member of NATO. Since it already is, it must not cross the line and send Mig-29's to Ukraine because Russia has stated that would be considered an act of war. The USA must not become involved militarily with other nations of the world as it has previously done. It must not be so warlike. It actually owes it descendants of the founders many great retributions for what they have unduly suffered in the last century, especially as to Babelist real estate and demographic demise, diminishment of their posterity and potential inheritance. The Congress should be thinking how to revive them and the nation even as ancient Israel used to protect its patrilineal, homogeneous race and descendants of the founding posterity: See Numbers 36. George Washington, our first president in case some of our immigrants do not know, recommended that the USA stay out of foreign affairs. This was good advice, but it was politically mocked unnecessarily with WW I and II. Since that time, international conflict became a bad effect of the status quo for the military complex to incite war on a global scale. Today, people of the American government don't really have a good idea of how peaceful that it could have been--without propaganda and war that was not promoted by our early politicians. Economics Why trade with Communist nations when their end-goal is to overcome other nations! Why make your enemies prosper to the point they can destroy you. Trade and prosperity must be limited to countries that favor national freedom and the right for individuals to pursue happiness. However, this must be restricted so as to prevent our nation for fighting for their problems. On The Other Hand: War With Russia Nevertheless, logically, if the USA decides to eventually back up Ukraine with our military in case of a conflict with Russia, a nuclear war could evolve. This could be catastrophic to the USA, and perhaps many other nations. Babel Religious Moral Among Nations If Hitler had not made the mistake of discounting the Slavic people, perhaps they could have helped him fight Communism and won the war against Russia. A Ukraine under German influence in his time could have made Europe homogeneous, great and prosperous. Today, Russia (and Ukraine as well) promotes accursed, Babelism and anti-Christian culture as Lenin and Stalin, and since WW II, Europe and the USA have also become Babelistic. There needs to be a national reversal of this back to homogeneity and one-people nationalism. However, it is not time for the USA to get involved in other countries' disagreements. We need to guard and protect our own borders. Russia inviting soldiers from other nations, especially Muslim-oriented, gives Ukraine the right to invite NATO. Putin has no respect for the people who honor the Christian Bible in Ukraine, or probably elsewhere. This is proved by his actions on accepting anti-Christian soldiers from those other nations. He not only invites Muslim Babel, he is against his own professed religion! Ukraine must seek homogeneous negotiation with Russia and allow the Russian people who want to go to Russia to do so. No nation should fight for mixture and Babelism. Losing some former land is not that important: Give Russia's demands for the Eastern provinces it claims. Making an agreement for Ukraine not to join military alliances would also be acceptable to end the death toll. However, whatever the scenario, the USA must not involve its people in this conflict. When George Washington and our military conquered England, we did not have help from outside sources... we (French and English: Japhethic [white] peoples) did it ourselves. The French have a long history in North America. New Orleans is still known for its French culture. Both the English and the French were also anti-Babelistic at that time: The moral of sovereignty, dominance and superior position had not been overthrown through NWO media and propaganda lies. Update 09/30/2022: When I wrote this Ukraine was suffering land losses at the beginning. Now that the war scenario has changed and Putin has annexed other remaining parts even under his retreating army, I do not think that gives him a right to usurp more authority as he already has done with Crimea. However, I do not think this is a war for the USA, and especially under the name of democracy when the meaning of the word has changed so much today. Our nations' leaders are responsible to keep us out of Ukraine and Europe's war. Ukraine itself would not promote Washington and Jefferson democracy, so we really have no advantage to extend ourselves to a point of war with our own country. Ukraine and other nations need to work out their religious issues first because Jewishism and Christianity are 180 degrees apart. THERE IS NO “RAPTURE”/3RD
RESURRECTION, There is a great misconception and heresy going on today! The unlearned and perhaps lower IQ people are proclaiming things that they don't understand and are not true. They are becoming false witnesses. Since man has to die, man has to be resurrected (see Hebrews 11:39, 40), to realize his perfect form (I Cor. 13:10), to live with Christ. (See I Corinthians 15: 12-34.) However, contrary to the Scripture, the deceivers are predicting a different or 3rd resurrection-like event/ “rapture” only in the form of an alive collective body being raised up before the great tribulation. The Bible speaks of only two resurrections in verse I Cor. 15: 23: the “firstfruits” and “afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.” Paul spoke of divine justice and chronological order as to the fulfillment of the hope of believers having life beyond earth. I know of no alive collective body anastasis to “meet the Lord in the air” except at the end (I Thessalonians 4:17), at Christ's coming: “14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. 15For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. 18Wherefore comfort one another with these words.” (I Thessalonians, chapter 4) The Greek word for resurrection is anastasis. It means a rising up, and in I Cor. 15:12, specifically from the dead. It is used in Paul's chapter 15 ideology as when a person has died, then has raised up or is going to be raised up from death, not raised up while living except at the end (mentioned above: I Thessalonians 4:17). The Apostle Paul also told us in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17 that the anti-Christ appearing in the temple must come first before the Lord appears. Therefore, chronologically, anyone raised up to meet the Lord while living will have to see the anti-Christ first because the impostor will be revealed before the Lord destroys him. The coming of Christ will be one of the last things, so plan on seeing great tribulation if you plan to meet Jesus alive. Even after Christians meeting him in the air, the Lord Jesus Christ must reign on earth. (I Cor. 15:24-28) Thy kingdom come, amen. |
|||
|
Links: 144,000, Firstfruits And James 1:1 Dumitru Duduman: Civil War And Russian Attack World War III Prophecy: Siener van Rensburg Michael Boldea (grandson of Duduman) Norwegian Woman End-Time Vision--1968 Beware Of “Rapture” False Witness Verses Containing The Word “Resurrection” From The KJV Don't Believe The Ten Minutes Lie Taiwan Top Diplomat Addresses Threats Of Russia-China Alliance
|
|
|
|