History of AA Slavery Inversion





At least unique visitors
have been online recently.

Links:

Result: Deformation and Slavery Inversion

Biblical Institutions

Last Hope: Affirmative Action Abolition

From Slavery to Inversion



Abolition of Slavery: American Heresy

SLAVERY

Slavery is not chattel-buying. It is not transporting slaves. Slavery is not an institution of undue cruelty (Exodus 21:20). Slavery is a form of servitude (bondage) through physical and mental labor. Faithful (circumcised) servants during the time of Moses could partake in rituals (Exodus 12:44). Some Christians (having circumcised hearts) implicitly were servants during the time of the Apostle Paul:

Art thou called being a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather.” (1 Corinthians 7:21)

The Hebrew masters (employers) were required to discern (discriminate) genetics and genealogy (race), and show favor including contract time and less rigorous work; they purchased Hebrew slaves for a six-year contract, unless it was extended by choice of the slave:

Exodus 21:1 Now these are the judgments which thou shalt set before them. 2 If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. 3 If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. 4 If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself. 5 And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: 6 Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.

Slavery was a form of economic life and social control, but it was not for abuse of run-aways, compassion was required:

Dt. 23:15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee: 16 He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best: thou shalt not oppress him.

TIMES OF NOAH: PATRIARCH OF ALL LIVING

Whites (Japhethic peoples) were blessed from the time of Noah as to leading and managing labor and rights for blacks (Hamitic peoples). It is a perpetual, genetic blessing. Those that say particular, racial blessing and genetic lineages (races and subraces) do not exist defy the words of Noah.

Genesis 9:27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. (KJV)

On the brighter side of Noahic spoken destiny, Japheth, the progenitor of the white people, was enlarged and privileged. His descendants brought civilization (Christianity) to the world after the fall and dispersion of the Hebrews (descendants of Shem, a darker colored people in between the white and the black). The ministry of bringing God's message to people of the world was extended beyond the Hebrews. Europe, Asia and many other pilgrimages of faithful, white men (USA) were blessed and brought forth great religious, moral standards and industry.

Considering all the works and antagonism of man and demon against God and the blessings of the descendants of Japheth, the white still has many blessings and an inherent desire to lead and share his wealth (spiritual, intellectual and material). The antagonist can persecute only to the degree that God allows, but he can't change God's will and lastingly overthrow his design! The Anti-Christ himself will only be permitted a temporary rule.

EUROPE AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETING: NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR THE SLAVE

England and many countries had been involved in international shipping and the African slave market. The black newcomers among the Whites did have the advantage of being among a more noble people than their former black or Islamic masters.

Nevertheless, although the black men and women may have prospered through serving new servants and masters in various countries, some of the people of the white lands generally did not want slavery or its continuance. One reason may have been due to the fear and risk of the existence of blacks as a racial and cultural, pollution problem, having to co-exist with mere and useless or non-beneficial neighbors.

On the other hand, some of the white people may generally have thought they were doing a favor for the black, and could use them as servants (slaves). Others may have thought in more financial terms alone. Eventually, heretics and abolitionists protagonized and antagonized, and caused a dissension between the states.

ABOLITION OF SLAVERY, AND HERESY

Abolition is like abortion. It is an unlawful taking away of something given by the creator of the universe, a product of His human reproduction process. A baby's life is given by God, and man cannot take it away without the knowledge and judgment of God: “... life for life” (Exodus 21:22, 23).

Abolition (of slavery) is the taking away of the sovereignty mechanism, economic and labor institution which God designed for the Hebrews, a model for all nations. Nevertheless, slavery is a biblical institution and cannot really be taken away, its form can only be distorted.

Morally, abortion must cease to exist, and the ethic of aiding the healthy delivery of the baby must begin. Similarly, abolition of slavery should have been stopped at the beginning, and the ethic of resolving slavery, release, homogeneity and repatriation issues should have taken precedence.

CHRISTIAN SLAVERY: FREEDOM AT REQUEST OF A BELIEVER

Slavery law was provided fulfillment in regard to Christianity, offering freedom at request to any slave who believed in Jesus the Christ. Christians have always had a great influence upon the advancement of government and human life. Even though many Christians never owned slaves, some did. However, concerning obedience to the direction of the Apostle Paul in Philemon, considering the cost and expense of owning a slave and then giving release, a slave was not considered a good financial investment.

Nevertheless, white nations had governments with Christians as part of their people, and Christian influence was limited upon the government because many of the people were heretically and biblically ignorant. This is where the abolition and heresy propaganda flourished, among the biblically unlearned and anti-Christian peoples! A theological and social division began to develop among geographical areas, the North and the South, and instead of a fair agreement of retribution to the southern owners and repatriation, eventually, an unnecessary war began.

RACE AND CULTURE MIXING ABHORRED

Robert E. Lee was knowledgeable of the morality of biblical institution and not deceived by the abolitionists. He knew they were the source of national trouble and division in the American government. However, he realized Blacks were a racial part of a political evil and for the most part were not wanted as mere neighbors for social enhancement in either part of the country.

Even during the Civil War, repatriation seemed to be the best resolve for Abraham Lincoln:

There is an unwillingness on the part of our people, harsh as it may be, for you free colored people to remain with us. Now, if you could give a start to white people, you would open a wide door for many to be made free.”

Author: Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865. Title: Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 5, P. 372. Publication date: 1953 Electronic Form: sponsored by the Abraham Lincoln Association (6-9-2005)

SOLVING SLAVERY AND POLITICAL ISSUES WAS NEEDED RATHER THAN FORCE OF ABOLITION

Lincoln made a mistake by jeopardizing political fidelity and imposing a humanistic, if not a demonic and anti-Christian approach (not necessarily biblical) upon the people of the young nation. For instance, if he had opposed a civil violation or unreasonable disallowance of the freedom of the Christian slave or after a designated time period (or abuse concerning some biblical statute principle), he would have had a legitimate cause to press his notion among a Christianity-spreading people; however, to force his own dogmatic proposition without sufficient or accurate Scriptural support was a grievous risk upon the constitutional foundation. As a general rule, humanism, or politics without God, manifested especially as conflicting with Scripture or Christian direction, causes more problems down the road than it is worth.

ONE WHITE RACE AND SUPERIOR POSITION

Nevertheless, Lincoln formerly actually thought of America as a country for only white people and their leadership:

" ... no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks."

(Vol. V, pp. 371-5)
Lincoln, A. (1953-55).
Collected Works

I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

The above excerpt was found at the following link at founding.com: Founders' Library: Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at Charleston, September 18, 1858

Whether he was sincere but more impressed as a dangerous and unGodly opportunist is at question now. Whatever, abolition of slavery heresy rather than slavery legal adjustment became the ruin of the biblical institutions of America and the Japhethic dream.