|
A
Hesedken
Presentation FINGER DEFILEMENT MAY BE A CAUSE FOR REQUIRED SINGLENESS
SEXUAL ABSTINENCE MUST BE REQUIRED FOR DEFILED WOMEN Biblically, a woman must have chastity as a prerequisite for marriage. Unfortunately, many women have had their chastity stolen through less obvious sexual experiences than penis rape. Fingering is similarly defiling as a penis defilement because it uncovers the innocence and intimacy of the female. There is a cognizance of the experience, and a zero-cognizance factor is required for purity and marriage. Many deceived women overlook their defilement and marry anyway, disregarding the physical and spiritual damage. This is simply fornication, and it cannot be justified. Such women should have received sexual abstinence therapy and prevented any further defilement. We need to establish stable, ethic committees (unlike sin-tolerant MSU) and holy standards for the protection of our women; we must not induce a Marxist or Stalinist, cuckold culture. Larry Nassar is facing what he deserves for his destruction and perversion of so many innocent girls. His wicked inmates will not receive him with the same treatment and hospitality his former colleagues gave him. His food will not be the choice of steak and baked potato at his request. People will not admire him as a professional any longer. He may be in danger of his life even in protective custody. Many such perverts walk our streets as professionals and non-professionals. Beware, and raise your children without access to trust deception and unnecessary endangerment.
DAMAGED
MERCHANDISE
SEX WITH A VIRGIN AND MARRIAGE CONSUMATION Adam and Eve “knew” one another. They became one flesh through and after their coitus experience. Similarly, a chaste Roman Catholic priest that has had sex with a virgin (whether a nun or not) and divorced (separated) her should renounce his ministry position if necessary because the obligation of fulfilling the marriage responsibility is biblically required if the virgin's father accepts him as a husband. However, his ministry position isn't necessarily of prime importance. If the male priest respects the institution of marriage, he should not put away his wife because of his ministry position because the Scripture says the husband “shall cleave to his wife” (Gn. 2:24); and also, that no one should separate what God has yoked together (Mk. 10:9)--”one flesh” (Gn. 2:24). If the priest doesn't accept the once virgin as a wife, then he would not be fulfilling the chastity law and would be putting himself in a position similar to that of a fornicator and worse than a mere slanderer, realizing the virginity testimony of the virgin but attempting to evade the marriage responsibility and cover up the sex-joining incident without a community trial, or otherwise, not believing in the marriage institution and unification of God. Concerning the latter case of infidelity, he then by no means should continue as a proclaimed minister of God. RE-UNIFICATION OF CHASTE FEMALE AFTER SEPARATION Officials Of Religious Organizations Who Should Re-unite Their Relationships Re-unification of the Roman Catholic priest and his former wife would be proper as long as the female partner has not had sex with anyone else after her separation. In case they join back together and can't live compatibly, and separate again, neither would be allowed to remarry. Legalizing an annulment would not justify their divorce nor allow remarriage. Scripture is always the authority, not a board decision or a minister of a religious organization! Below is an example of how erring ministers make the law of God void: A good example of “an annulment” that could be given on solid grounds would be if a woman were to “marry” (through no fault of her own) a man whom she later discovered to be a validly ordained priest. Since priests cannot enter into matrimony (canon 1972),4 the union between this priest and the woman was not a valid marriage. She would be given a decree of nullity that she was never married. She would be free to marry another person. This quote was taken from “28. The Annulment Fiasco – The Vatican II Sect’s De Facto acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage” on website page http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/28_Annulments.pdf on Aug. 12, 2013.
SPIRITUAL LEWDNESS AND FORNICATION I remember a Roman Catholic girl who had a brother and whose supposedly virgin girl friend had sex with him. Their relationship broke up. Instead of trying to re-unite the couple or avoid her ex-virgin friend due to a desire to date other men, she double dated with the ex-virgin due to her still being considered a personal, long-time friend. This was an act of injustice in itself and even an assault against the male who was dating the ex-virgin, knowing the girl's unchastity and former bond with her brother. This is a type of spiritual fornication. Even though she didn't proclaim unchastity for herself, she impliedly condoned fornication by aiding her girl friend to become involved with another man other than her brother. AVOID RELATIONSHIPS WITH LEWD PEOPLE Men must not date women that proclaim they are physically chaste but are spiritually lewd such as this (see above paragraph). How long would her physical chastity last once she married! If she can't discern the iniquity of her girl friend's unwarranted relationship, where would she get spiritual strength to fight off sexual temptation in the future. If she generally trusts the Roman Catholic Church doctrine, and not the Scripture, she is not ready for biblical marriage. Remaining single is the only recovery for a defiled virgin who is devastated. Single women must understand this and that defilement consequences are perpetual. Fornication is the only justification for divorce/annulment (Mt. 19.9) ... Refuting the “Perpetual Virginity” and Re-virginity Doctrine ROMAN CATHOLICS LEAVING THEIR CHURCH
|
|||||||||||
|
|