|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christian Genealogy: The Development of Racial Affinity 1. Adam and Eve 2. The three
sons of Noah 3. The tower of Babel (Gn. 11.7)
Further Analysis of Particular Races Descendants of
Shem, Son of Noah Ezran era Judaism was law-and-covenant keeping and disallowed racial mixing and hybrids in the midst of their congregation.
Identifying
the Modern "So Called" Jew Requires Two Elements for
Many: I have noticed there are generally three types of distinguished genetic, "Jewish" peoples between the Arab (Semitic)-European (Japhethic) spectrum; this does not include the full spectrum of all Jewish peoples: First, is the Sephardic, who is similar to the Arab. For instance, Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar is said to be Sephardic. Although required by the Torah, I have not seen any genealogical records or evidence of patrilineal succession (see Phil. 3.5) among present-day Sephardi peoples. (2) Then there are the mixed, Semitic-Japhethic (Euro-Semitic). For example, by having lighter skin, Henry Kissinger seems to have the mixed look, or at least a lighter skin color and different facial features than an Arab and he also is physically different than a Northern European, especially the shape of the nose and ear lobes. Also, take note of Albert Einstein or William S. Cohen. (Visit our "Cohen" study.) (3) Third, are the Japhethic or European (non-Semitic) "Jewish". You do not have to be born Jewish to be Jewish; it is a culture of matrilineal succession religion. The second (by the way, there is no 14th Hebrew tribe!) and third groups fail the torah-required, patrilineal, Semitic, racial homogeneity and actually have no more right than Torah-illegal immigrants to Israel; however, such have attained power and hegemony in Israel and other countries as Zionists. Both groups may be incorrectly referred to as Euro-Jews but due to the lack of homogeneity actually Euro alternative-Jews would be a more suitable name. The third group can easily be identified as a hoax group even more so than the second: As it seems to me, there are mixed or dominantly non-Semitic tribes generally from eastern Europe (descendants of Japheth) or Asia, although many have emigrated to various countries throughout the world. They are biologically different and genetically non-acceptable. Such have been inaccurately called or identified as Jews due to their adoption of modern Talmud Judaism, a heresy from Berith and Torah. Even the ones who have racially mixed, although as mongrels or possibly non-Jacobean Semitic at all, feign a Hebrew culture. They have a social and mental similarity as to assuming they should rule over non-alternative-Jews. Their enmity and religious goals toward the Gentile appear blatantly and delusively, self-contradictory and self-hating. (Does Shelley Rubin look dominantly Semitic from a physical view or like an Arab? Of course not! Some pictures.) It is difficult to accurately establish the genetic character of some people through pictures. Notice the almost European, light, physical appearance of Finance Minister Ehud Olmert and the ADL's Abraham Foxman. They are certainly not as the darker Jewish men of Arab countries. It is amazing Jewish Zionist bigots (beware: foul language; also see the Balfour Declaration) appear in so many different, physical forms, as their acceptance of one another contradicts the just, homogeneous, racial discrimination of the genuine Hebrew and defies (defames) the faith, will and hope of the patriarch Judah. Non-Jacobean biological groups or hybrid generations actually can not qualify according to the Torah regardless of haplotype, Y-DNA and mtDNA testing--it only took one occurrence of miscegenation to disqualify seed (partial descendants) from Ezran Israel.
Descendants of
Japheth,
Son of Noah Read the very helpful and worthwhile mentioning essay on the Nordish Race; although based on a non-Genesis-evolution theory, it can not be Scripturally accurate or totally acceptable.
Descendants of
Ham, Son of Noah
Various other tribes or mixtures: The book, March of the Titans - A History of the White Race, may give some interesting suggestions, especially through the pictures. However, it can not be completely relied upon because many of its assumptions do not have adequate proof and may be intellectually challenged (although perhaps without adequate proof also). It also has an evident, non-Christian nature, which inherently denies the author the ability to grasp the concept of racial evolution from a full, Biblical perspective, and many of the unfaithful views on religion can be easily refuted.
Other Interesting Links
*Note: Hesedken may link to other sites; however, that does not imply that they share our views or opinions. |