THE LOSS OF FREEDOM: WHO BEARS THE MOST GUILT, HITLER OR ROOSEVELT!

If anyone has his own video on the fall of France (WW II), which must be all and only your work, send it on disk to us. We will be glad to put it on the Internet (on this page).

My personal opinion is that Hitler did not handle success very well. After signing the treaty in France would have been a good time for him to retire and let the Reich make its own way. The German army often proved itself superior and succeeded as it fought as individuals and units against the French and British. However, when Hitler deprived this ability from his generals and men in Russia it led to disaster. The same detriment similarly occurred politically when Hitler advanced himself as the dictator and democracy through individual districts was not tolerated--the political, moral and ethical freedom of the people as individuals and groups was lost.

He could have built upon his western victories and expanded his supply potential. There was no need to fight without all the possible elements of victory so as not to jeopardize any men or gain. It seemed cruel to needlessly push his men into another front against much greater numbers and forcing the limits of his logistics system when he could have been industrializing the lands he gained before attempting further war. He also could have distributed his power to loyal, district leaders rather than taking complete rule upon himself. This may have increased the possibility of civil war under disagreement, but the system of rule should have been democratically branched, not merely subjugated as a democratic people without a voice under the dictate of an unreasonable or failing monarch. (Compare this tyranny with the apostate and heretic churches that are ruled by erring elite rather than edified by the people with God's message on their hearts.) First of all, man's duty is to God, not any dictator or even President Roosevelt as far as that goes.

On the other hand, the political party goals of Hitler were excellent. Racial homogeneity and autonomy framed the government platform. Although the ethics of Germany or all other nations or political platforms and their militaries have not been always worthy of praise, and perhaps their officers always have not implemented continuous amicable expulsion as a rule, but no one should speak evil of Christian moral and land-and-people virtue. As a matter in fact, every nation should adopt such racial purity, genetic, cultural and demographic welfare goals. Regardless of Hitler's faults, he was not guilty of destroying his revered goals; his enemies were.

Now, freedom and political rule by the people in the USA and among the western Allies has been lost. The descendants of those who destroyed the effort of land-and-people for Germany are reaping what their progenitors have sown. Even the demise of the diluted, racially polluted, multiracial-devised (antidemocratic) USA Constitution is revealing its weakness against the tightening grip of the antiChristian cabal. The remaining government freedoms of the various individuals and ethnic groups are being usurped and fading away as those of Germany were, only worse: the USA or their once nationalistic friends are not an oppressed, democratic monarchy as Germany became after overthrowing their former Marxist-prone people-and-country-for-profit remains from WW I; they have become diverse and antidemocratic tyrannies with their reigns pulled by the synagogue of Satan elite.

More ...