Messianic Nordish For Jewish Conversion

				How to be Saved
Harmlessness	Agape and Ethics	Tenets	Homogeneity	Marital Chastity	Video	Right to Life	Latest Pages	Free Biblical Language Course CD
Victory	Purity/Chastity Better Than Abstinence		Dress Code	Virginity	The Perverse, Subversive Media		Commentary: (Seven Texts)	Learn About Dating

MESSIANIC NORDISH FOR JEWISH CONVERSION
(Nordish Gentiles and Written Torah VS Partially Semitic Gentiles)

Replies from YouTube:

I had previously posted on “Response to a Jews for Jesus spokesman”, but Gavriel Yitzchak dropped my post. I personally think he was scared for others to see it because it demonstrated to the effect that the Jewish do not obey genetic, subracial law of Numbers 36: 5-13 and the Ezran Covenant (Ezra 10). My post also alluded to the patrilineal succession law inheritance of the Lord Jesus Christ through both parents. What does he have to lose in putting faith in the God's anointed, whom the Scriptures attribute his descendancy as patrilineal and legitimate?

However, he did send me a message (below: I put it in red font color) on 11/04/12.

Seemingly he tries to evade the real, genetic issue of Nu. 36:5-13 and make it a cultural issue by alluding to Dt. 7 and distorting so as to make further confusion. Won't work Gavriel! Then he mentions Ruth. Blessed Ruth's marriage, which was centuries before the Ezran Covenant, was permitted although it was not the norm. Nevertheless, King David was still born of patrilineal Hebrew descendancy. Jewish people do not meet this genetic and tribal requirement; they even to the contrary, propose an unwarranted matrilineal law in direct opposition to God's design.

Perpetrating the misperception of Jewish being as Hebrew, Gavriel also stated, “On the other hand, in Ezra 10:2-3, the Jews returning to Israel vowed to put aside their non-Jewish wives and the children born to those wives. They could not have put aside those children if those children were Jews.” The real circumstances were the returning Hebrews (Jews) put away their non-Hebrew wives: the women did not belong (even if they were willing to follow all the cultural rules or not) to the genetic tribes of Israel and were disallowed an inheritance. The children of those women were hybrids and could not be included in the tribes of Israel either.

Failing to justify and prove himself concerning Hebrew succession inheritance of the tribe of Judah, Gavriel continued to flounder and also made some erroneous comments on my video “Council Of Nicaea: Jesus Is God”. He is like a blind guide. Don't follow his mistakes.

Re:Patrilineal Succession Law And Deity Of Christ

"Truth is necessary, not fables. Many people think Jews For Jesus are Hebrew. This is not true. The Jewish do not follow the patrilineal law of inheritance according to Moses. (David Brickner should study Hebrew tribal inheritance law if he would like to know more about the disinherited Hebrew or partial Hebrew.) Actually the Jewish follow a post-Babylonian, (anti-Ezran), matrilineal rule that defies the written Torah and destroys the possibility of Hebrew genetic acceptability. Therefore, genetically, they are not patrilineally Hebrew and real Jews. Actually, most of them are mere goyim (Gentiles) although perhaps mixed with some Semitic blood."

Jews follow the patrilineal laws of inheritance. i.e. Tribal and priestly affiliation is passed through the father. However, status as a member of the people has nothing to do with this.

In Deuteronomy 7:1-5, in expressing the prohibition against intermarriage, G-d says "he [i.e., the non-Jewish male spouse] will cause your child to turn away from Me and they will worship the gods of others." No such concern is expressed about the child of a non-Jewish female spouse. From this, we infer that the child of a non-Jewish male spouse is Jewish (and can therefore be turned away from Judaism), but the child of a non-Jewish female spouse is not Jewish (and therefore turning away is not an issue).

Leviticus 24:10 speaks of the son of an Israelite woman and an Egyptian man as being "among the community of Israel" (i.e., a Jew).

On the other hand, in Ezra 10:2-3, the Jews returning to Israel vowed to put aside their non-Jewish wives and the children born to those wives. They could not have put aside those children if those children were Jews.

The author of the article is making the classical mistake that being a Hebrew or being a Jew is racial. This concept is certainly not Biblical at all. Ruth the Moabite is the female ancestor of King David. Was King David not Hebrew?

Being Jewish is about the observance of a covenant. You can be born into it or you can choose it (Esther 8:17, Isaiah 56) but it certainly isn't racial and there are not and have never been any such things as "genetic Jews" as the article suggests.

As to your video, I would suggest a better translation than the KJV. It is not my opinion but historical fact that the KJV was deliberately altered to make some prophecies appear to point to Jesus.

As to your assertion that G-d can be man, I would ask you to consult Numbers 23:19 where it clearly states otherwise. As a rule of thumb, is the Torah states something clearly, don't go looking for it in the margins elsewhere because that is how meanings get contrived from nothing when we already have a clear answer.

Be well,
Gavriel

LINKS: RE: Messianic Judaism? Can Jews believe in Jesus?

At least unique visitors
have been online recently.