|
Racial Posterity of Ruth: Semitic with Israelite, Patrilineal Inheritance |
I was therefore obliged to relate this history of Ruth, because I had a mind to demonstrate the power of God, who, without difficulty, can raise those that are of ordinary parentage to dignity and splendor, to which he advanced David, though he were born of such mean parents.
The Works of Flavius Josephus,
translated by William Whiston
Antiquities of the Jews
Book
V -- From the Death of Moses to the Death of Eli
Links and references:
Redeemed: Ruth was a Moabitic convert and redeemed by God through faith. She was blessed and accepted among God's people to be a builder of Israel as Rachel and Leah (Ruth 4:11). Ruth is a model for Christians, whether Japhethic, Semitic or Hamitic, who also have been redeemed by God through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and his providence, and are the Israel of God (Galatians 6:15, 16).
Semitic race: Josephus did not relate in the context concerning the marriage of Ruth as inter-racial in the sense of physical difference; even though, the non-Israelite neighbors were perhaps perceived by the Israelites as different because of their general wayward tradition noted as "ordinary", or perhaps "mean".
It seems it may be deduced that Ruth was Semitic and a descendant of Lot. "Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father. And the firstborn bare a son, and called his name Moab: the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day." (Gn. 19:36, 37 KJV) Lot and Abraham were related. (Gn. 13:8) Even though the Moabites were not Israeli, they were Semitic.
Patrilineal inheritance of posterity: Ruth being a progenitor (great grandmother) of King David was a famous exception [deviation] to the intra-family (intra-subrace) law, not the norm. However, inheritance was determined patrilineally and David was an heir of Israel through Boaz, his great grandfather, the husband of Ruth. ( Mt. 1: 5, 6) Joseph, the husband of Mary, the mother of the Lord Jesus Christ, descended from the lineage of Boaz. (Mt. 1: 16) Nevertheless, keep in mind Ruth's marriage was many generations and events before the restoration of the subracial law conflict in Ezra, wherein a covenant was made (see Romans 9:4). The time that the epistle was written was also near and perhaps during the time of union of the twelve tribes in Christ (James 1:1).
Illegitimacy of modern, matrilineal, cultural inheritance: Also, note today the so called “Jewish”--not genetic or patrilineal Jews--determine their cultural (not racial!) descendancy matrilineally. The Jewish are actually land frauds due to their mockery of the law of Moses (Nu. 36:5-13) and the written Torah; while occupying Israel, they have no Torah legitimacy or real (patrilineal) inheritance in the land.
Understanding dispensations and
close-relative law:
"For instruction and guidance in
this area of philosophy (segregation) we need true and pure, divine
authority: The Old Testament gives us guidelines (I Tim. 1:8-11).
Marital segregation was instituted among the tribes within the race
of Israel (Nu. 36:5-13). (In order to understand what is Biblically
acceptable concerning the close relative law of marriage, you must
realize that God's commandments were given in dispensations. From the
beginning, Adam and Eve were the progenitors of the whole earth.
Thus, hypothetically, through regeneration, the earth could not have
been filled with people without one of their sons having sex with one
of their daughters. The close relative law was not in effect at that
time. Even later on, as the world passed, what was once permitted in
Jacob's time was incriminated in Lv. 18:18. As time continued, God's
laws were increased and written. Eventually and finally, the New
Testament books were written. So, even with a brief recalling, the
marriage between cousins may seem surprisingly close today; however,
it did not violate the close relative law of Lv. 18:6- 18).
Nevertheless, and relative to the point, these laws and commandments
(Nu. 36:5-13) protected the inheritance of the people of Israel. From
this, it can be deduced that a righteous nation should protect the
inheritance of its people even to the extent of intratribal
segregation." More
details
Note: The matrilineal law of the Herzlists (modern “Jewish”) cannot duplicate patrilineal law (Numbers 36:5-13) nor the principal of the kinsman redeemer, which adhered to patrilineal law. (Ruth 4:18-22) Their women don't have patrilineal inheritance as Naomi. Nevertheless, Ruth received great grace through Boaz because she was not accepted by her kinsman redeemer who had first choice (Ruth 4:6) because of her progeny and being a Moabitic woman. Suffering worse consequences, the non-Hebrew women of Ezra 10 were totally rejected and put away. Today, modern Israel is occupied by the Jewish, a non-Hebrew people, who have less credentials than the rejected of Ezra. They have no genetic or genealogical inheritance, and their religious culture (matrilineal succession) is in direct opposition to Moses (patrilineal law: Nu. 36:5-13), the covenant (Ezra 10:3) and the kinsman redeemer law. The Jewish can defraud, make themselves a cult and spread myth, but they can't make themselves Hebrews/Jews.
Respect of founding, racial homogeneity is the glue that holds a nation together:
Ruth, one of the great descendants of faith, believed in race and patrilineal law (Ruth 4: 18-22). Racial homogeneity is the glue that holds a nation together. Israel was held together as long as its constituents followed patrilineal law of the Hebrews. However, after the scattering of Titus, there are no current known continuous genealogies today. There are imitation groups such as the “Jewish” but they are not Hebrew, and their contradictory matrilineal law attests to it.
The United States was a homogeneous country until the latter1800's and the white race was no longer respected as the race of Lincoln's “superior position”. Since, the whites lost their sovereignty in increments through corrupt, political, judicial and legislative events after that time until today. The people that once looked up to whites as the founders of a great nation did not continue to hold their respect for them as heirs as Ruth did the Hebrews and Jews. Humility and respect of the founding race is a trait of a loyal citizen but this virtue has been mocked in the last century, and morality has been despised, especially in the US. A country that despises its founders and overthrows their descendants cannot prosper long. When nations absolve sovereignty and racial homogeneity, they invite more racial and social chaos, and it seems to be happening on a global scale.
The Modern “Jewish” Are Not Jews: They Are As Rejects Of Ezra: “Polluted"
Theological Degrees Are Not Enough Sometimes: Gene Kim Heresy
Zero-Tolerance, Racial and Cultural Segregation Constitution
Ruth was not an anti-Semite; she admitted she was a Moabitess