Comparing Evils Of Circumvention
The Joos -- Having No Biblical Legitimate Pedigree Or Register -- Have Manipulated
Other Nations As Well As Charles Manson Manipulated His Family
(I would like to ask Christians and others to do a biblical study
on patrilineal law and circumspectfully realize how
religious ministers have swallowed the lie
or ignored this very important topic!)

Mere Joo, Written Torah Circumvention: Evasion Of The Truth

At times, the Joos/impostors use a reference of Deuteronomy 7:3, 4 as a defense to their lack of patrilineal pedigree and mandated (Ezra 2:61-63) register. However, those verses are not verses specifically having to do with inheritance (na ha la, v. 7) as Numbers 36:5-13 do (see below).

The Joos (cult proselytes, similar to the Persian converts in Esther, and not like the Macabbees -- many of them with Polish and other Gentile, genealogical backgrounds) also may use distortion to promote their irreligion: Their Purim drunkenness ritual is a great example of their violation of the written Torah.

There are infinite ways to circumvent the truth. Satan is a master at it.

At one hour and 14 minutes, Mr. Brown goes into Gn. 17 and circumcision as a criterion for a Jew. The "Jewish", similary as the proselytes of Esther, may observe a facade of Old Testament practices and this cutting operation but that cannot make them Hebrew or a Jew. Ritual cannot induce or change genetics, genealogy and biology so as to make a Gentile a Jew. The deciding criterion is patrilineal law (Nu. 36:5-13), which if their ancestors began with patrilineal law, they did not continue to follow it, and can't produce a Hebrew/Jew child. The "Jewish" are merely Herzl Matrilinealists. So, don't be deceived by all of Mr. Brown's circumvention. If he were a decent Christian, he would be glad to call himself a "Jewish" convert to Christianity, not a Jew. Modern converts have been Joodaized and followed a Talmudic cult, whereas Old Testament converts as the proselytes in Esther followed the true religion at that time and were Judaized.

At about 1 hour and 37 minutes: Ezra acted according to the law (Ezra 10:3), not his own agenda. He was referring to Numbers 36:5-13, which neither debater seems to recognize! In Ezra a covenant was made: The faithful put away their non-Hebrew, illegitimate wives and children. "Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law" (Ezra 10:3). (See) 1 Esdras 9:36 "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children." (The King James Version Apocrypha). Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy and register, and the children of the occupiers of the land are as polluted (yegoahlu): Ezra 2: 61-63. They cannot produce a Hebrew messiah, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession (Matthew 1). The matrilineal law of the "Jewish" is 180 degrees from the required patrilineal law of Nu. 36.

Non-Joo, Fact-Searching Circumvention: Evasion Of The Truth

When I see a person with a kippa, yarmulke, koppel or some type of “Jewish” hat as a token as submission to man instead of God, I suspect a demonic, cult trait instantly. The Joos basically study the Bible and other writings (Oral Torah) in delusive rejection or ignorance of the Lord Jesus Christ. Those that don't wear the hat are not considered among themselves as a very religious person.