"LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: It will be
very difficult for an audience so large as this to hear
distinctly what a speaker says, and consequently it is
important that as profound silence be preserved as possible.
"While I was at the hotel to-day,
an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was
really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the
negroes and white people. While I had not proposed to myself on
this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question
was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in
saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am
not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way
the social and political equality of the white and black
races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making
voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold
office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in
addition to this that there is a physical difference between
the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid
the two races living together on terms of social and political
equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do
remain together there must be the position of superior and
inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having
the superior position assgned to the white race. I say upon
this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is
to have the superior position the negro should be denied every
thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro
woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My
understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my
fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for
either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for
us to get along without making either slaves or wives of
negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my
knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing
a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and
white men. I recollect of but one distinguished instance that I
ever heard of so frequently as to be entirely satisfied of its
correctness—and that is the case of Judge Douglas's old
friend Col. Richard M. Johnson. I will also add to the remarks
I have made (for I am not going to enter at large upon this
subject), that I have never had the least apprehension that I
or my friends would marry negroes if there was no law to keep
them from it; but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be
in great apprehension that they might, if there were no law to
keep them from it, I give him the most solemn pledge that I
will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which
forbids the marrying of white people with negroes. I will add
one further word, which is this: that I do not understand that
there is any place where an alteration of the social and
political relations of the negro and the white man can be made
except in the State Legislature—not in the Congress of
the United States—and as I do not really apprehend the
approach of any such thing myself, and as Judge Douglas seems
to be in constant horror that some such danger is rapidly
approaching, I propose as the best means to prevent it that the
Judge be kept at home and placed in the State Legislature to
fight the measure. I do not propose dwelling longer at this
time on this subject."
The above excerpt was found at the following link at
founding.com:
Founders' Library: Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at Charleston,
September 18, 1858
Our comment: From the brief words in
the excerpt, considering Lincoln showed morality as to
separation, he evidently lacked the biblical
foresight, apprehension, leadership character and urgency
so as to amicably expedite
a successful and complete sectorization if not deportation
program (see Ezra
10 ) for blacks among his contemporaries; however, he
worked
on it.
Generally, the South's view, although
it was not without its faults, was more
correct than the North's concerning the issues leading to
the Civil War. Since war and military action is not the proper
response to settle issues among any nation, Lincoln made a
mistake by jeopardizing political fidelity and imposing a
humanistic approach (not necessarily biblical) upon the people
of the young nation. For instance, if he had opposed a civil
violation or unreasonable disallowance of the freedom of the
Christian slave or after a designated time period (or abuse
concerning some biblical
statute principle), he would have had a legitimate cause to
press his notion among a Christianity-spreading people;
however, to force his own dogmatic proposition without
sufficient or accurate Scriptural support was a grievous risk
upon the constitutional foundation.
As a general rule, humanism, or politics
without God, manifested especially as conflicting with
Scripture or Christian direction, causes more problems down the
road than it is worth.
Slavery
was an established form of labor throughout history. As a
matter in fact, some slaves were even so by choice, not only by
the will of the master.
When Lincoln usurped the abolishment
of slavery (generally for black people and other non-white
races), he caused an anti-black-race-slavery evolution, in
effect a white-race-abdication evolution, to occur.
Consequently, and reversibly, now, the whites are increasingly
being led under captivity
to a definite degree. The toleration
of the Jewish in our politics and finance system, the Truman
integration policy, Kennedy
civil rights acts and later, Affirmative Action, threw salt on
the sore of the affliction and calamity upon white people. What
Lincoln presumptuously and recklessly proposed to achieve
became the noose of his heirs. Oppressive, forced, integration
lawlessnesses such as busing and especially housing have
threatened the Nordish race upon the brink of genocide. Many of
Lincoln's partial heirs, mulattoes, will never enjoy genetic
purity because of the miscegenation catastrophe due to
diversity association and the resulting infamous contact, much
less the heirs the opportunity of white-race social, economic
and labor freedom unless there is reversal or neutralization of
the present bondage.
On the other hand, Lincoln's
colonization
issue was appropriate. However, his abrupt, super-imposing,
sweeping, at least semi-national, emancipation proposal was
unjustified. A failure. It was a forcefully inappropriate
concept of reconstruction, unacceptable and opposed among
almost half of the nation. It was not convincing due to errant,
dogma in some parts and its totality. The premise of his
political issue, although he portrayed it as a religious issue
also, was not fully nor adequately founded upon a biblical
basis. Hence, he could not diplomatically persuade his cause.
He threw a progressing government into strife, division and
war. It caused an unnecessary catastrophe. How many lives could
have been saved and so much affliction been avoided if he had
aggressively performed the former goal and re-thought the
latter!
Now, his clear, contemporary, desire
for anti-miscegenation and separation, but with present and
later, ill-advised, feckless and liberal (anti-conservative)
expression of rash, regional emancipation, distorted the public
concept of labor ethics and racial, protective isolation. It
also foolhardily jeopardized the powers of the state (although
he admitted he had no apprehension of such disaster opens the
question of Lincoln's honesty) with those of the federal
government--a very important constitutional issue. This
humanistic, divergence has been oppressively and further
misused by current immoral, subversive, and enemy politicians
who gratefully mock heir fidelity in our homeland. It just
proves the point that if a leader is not aggressive in
instituting law (sectorization law in this case; he had
previously declared his favor for whites to possess racial
dominance, "superior position"), his seemingly
friends, treacherous as they may be, and adversaries are quick
to promote lawlessness and their own calamitous and ruinous
desires in its place. Such are those who have subverted the
political power of the USA, even though unconstitutionally and
factionally, and consequently have used this subversive
political power to vex and defile other Nordish lands
throughout the world.
Another thing, if Lincoln had
colonized the free slaves and left it at that, the remaining
slaves may have had an opportunity to eventually be colonized
also after earning their freedom. This would have been a much
more mild and less rash way of relieving slaves and not
reversibly endangering the slave-owner or the non-slave-owner
of his constitutional rights. Political usurpers are not
usually so gracious.
So what can we do about this tragedy?
First of all, it is the duty of white
citizens to unite and pull their children from public
schools and places where the diversity
lawlessness can ruin them. Re-establishing the constitution
is secondary. The home must be built on biblical morality
regardless of political help or conflict. It is our desire for
the inner man to thrive and his social environment through
that. Our race needs to be de-brainwashed first before
attempting to gain the numbers needed to fight a political
battle. Many of our people have been so subverted that they
don't have the understanding of separation as Lincoln
comprehended. Furthermore, due to this subversion, we have lost
the immediate political power to do something about it
gregariously in large numbers and geographically.
Another thing, not only is there a
physical and social difference as Mr. Lincoln mentioned, but
the statistics of hate crime should be recognized. Let our
families realize the need to live in our own communities for
the reason of safety also.
Other
Thoughts on Anti-miscegenation and the Contradicting Hate of
Those Who Speak Against Hate
Martin
Luther King Jr.: Interesting site found on internet [Beware:
Foul Language] Video
The
Black Paradox
VIDEO: TRIBAL
HOMOGENEITY AND ANTIMISCEGENATION
Josephus:
Nature of Seed, Animals and Men
Biblical Respect Of Founding-Heir Natural Rights
Jewish
Crime: Promoters of Subversion and Hostility
Will
power: a requirement for the struggle of promoting purity
Were
America's founding fathers anti-Semites?
Consider
the difference in thought and issues of the modern and early
politician
A
way to establish equality
Rescinding
Order No. 11: Further evidence of Lincoln's contra-speaking
(two tongues as the Indian may say) and immaturity so as to
abdicate white rule, and failure to understand that the
synagogue of Satan and Christianity can't successfully mix
More...
Not
so Mr. Whitehead!
Advance
the education of our advocates
...
The
American lie we are forced to live with:
The
Black Paradox
Personal
view
|