ORDER OUT OF CHAOS

GENERAL ALLEN AT DNC: "Precious Muslims"

Questions: Why not send Muslims to Syria to rebuild? Why not restore our status before the demise and make the USA homogeneous again? The answer is because the NWO is working for destruction.

NWO Push for Japhethic Neutralization in Light of the Protocols of Zion:
Distorting the Idea of Biblical, Genetic Democracy to a Marxist Political Division Concept

DEMOCRACY (SPECIFIC CONNOTATION): RULE BY ONE RACE OR PEOPLE

Etymology
The word democracy is derived from two Greek words:

daymos ( ) +- kratia ().
"1. Government by the people"
The above Greek etymology and English definition was taken from
The Oxford Universal Dictionary (1955).

Biblical Use (BC)
The same word “day'mos” in Numbers 3.21, Greek Septuagint, seems to imply the meaning "family" or "people of a particular racial lineage". You may see in Numbers 36:5-13 that the family and inheritance is determined through patrilineal, genetic succession. Hebrew race was the determining factor of inheritance and demographics. The land was not ruled by peoples of another race!

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

PROTOCOL No. 1

26.

In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOYA States. 8

Modern Israel Era
In contradiction to the law of Moses and Christianity and theodemocracy (one people and the Lord), modern Israel is ruled by mixed peoples and theocracy (Talmudocracy), merely people claiming one religion (Talmud--”our Torah”). Their Law of Return only allows people with connection to the Jewish religion, not Christians. Race has no significance. Such people banner “democracy”, but their sense of the word is in direct opposition to its ancient, biblical and racial meaning. Under these fabricated political, non-racial and religious dimensions, they are noted as Herzl Zionists.

American Civil War Era
Family lineage, or racial descent was the critical element of determination for the government benefit of possessing real estate and concurring rights "to rule" (government by the people) even after the Civil War had begun. This can be directly deduced through the words of Abraham Lincoln speaking for the favor of and solely -- the American Northern European people -- one race, one people. Recollecting the "ideal union our fathers dreamed", the not-so-mentioned-as-such-today racial homogeneitist, morally justified concerning the particular situation, specifically depicted his vision of America being ruled by only one white race: " ... no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks."1

Some time between the end of the Civil War and the initiation of the Federal Reserve Bank the American government had been infiltrated with politicians that promoted harm against the indigenous Japhethites. Russia was even suffering revolution. Eventually war was brought against Germany, another Japhethic nation. Instead of the leaders of the Japhethic nations promoting racial homogeneity and the good welfare of each racially related nation, they were being pseudo-philosophically divided and destroyed through the idea of “democracy”, which was actually a form of anti-democracy—government of a conglomeration of mixed peoples, not a one-race governing people. Even Mussolini was racially passive. He failed to divide his country into two separate governments (one in the northern part, and the other in the southern part of Italy) before it split so as to preserve racial homogeneity and separate, autonomous rule.

Viet Nam Era
The Marxist ideology and concept of multi-racial democracy became stronger and more respected than the natural and biblical, genetic concept. It was a determining factor of the following Korean and Viet Nam wars. American Japhethic peoples and others were sent to Viet Nam under the idea of bringing political democracy among an oriental, genetic people oppressed by Communism. Communism is a manifestation of Satan's end-time political destruction. Even as its soldiers have resisted and retaliated against Christianity, many counter-Communist enemies have also done so through agreeing with anti-genetic homogeneity, and anti-democratic, political maneuvers.

It would have been more feasible and genetically democratic to have let South Viet Nam become Communist and not have suffered war. The oriental peoples could have settled their own problems. After all, the USA aided the institution of Communist China after WW II. Viet Nam's proclivity toward Communism was a matter of much smaller concern in comparison, except for perhaps being a political pivot point for the behind-the-curtain elite. America did nothing during the war to make the Communist or non-Communist promote the concept of government through genetic democracy (the country was already homogeneous).

Counter-war morality decoy and adulteress Hanoi Jane demeaned Germany's effort to defend its subrace and homogeneity during WW II and successfully with admirable bravery gave the treasonous impression through world-wide audience that the USA was fine with its sexual immorality and other deterioration as long as it realized it must cease its military affairs in Viet Nam. Seemingly, while Americans were subtly, politically and physically distracted during the war, the Japhethic Americans in their own nation and birth place were made subservient to non-Japhethic peoples through Affirmative Action laws passed while partaking in the mind-overwhelming, Asian stratagem. We were not faithful to Noah's blessing by not protesting such political, racial overthrow. Being politically encouraged to become involved in a war that did not directly pertain to the prosperity of genetic democracy (and being scourged by the media and Hollywood's whip at the same time), we were psychologically undermined from concentrating on pertinent values and lost the battle of Japhethic dominance and survival at home.

On the other hand, if Japhethic peoples would have made war with other countries that oppressed genetic democracy or even had remained isolated and disagreed with multi-racial rule, and brought genetic democracy and self-enabling economic concepts to non-prosperous countries, our nations would not be afflicted with diversity, Japhethic, 2nd class citizen servitude and inter-racial antagonism today. Non-Japhethic and anti-cultural immigration is at a critical stage. The Japhethic peoples are facing genocide now.

So, with just a few examples and an explanation of democracy through its differently perceived meanings, you can see that the life perspective of the Japhethic people has changed greatly since Abraham Lincoln's speech on non-equality:

"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality."2

The historical, natural and cohesive, moral climate of democratic government through racial homogeneity was incubatorized through events and propaganda (order out of chaos) into a tyranny and displacement with forced and artificial, adhesive, multi-racial, cultural (lawless and counter-genetic) homogeneity. May God help us! Amen.

Works Cited:
8. THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 1.26
Found at Radio Islam (http://www.radioislam.org/protocols/indexen.htm#protocol_1) on 12/29/14
1 (Vol. V, pp. 371-5)
Lincoln, A. (1953-55).
Collected Works
2 The excerpt was found at the following link at founding.com: Founders' Library: : Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at Charleston, September 18, 1858



At least unique visitors
have been online recently.