Lack of Immigration
Control: Superiority without Sovereignty Is Slow Death
and Genocide
Without borders,
we have no sovereignty. America has lost its white democracy
and sovereignty through diversity and multicultural anarchy,
and the immigration will only get worse without sovereignty.
Although the American Northern European people
have been historically superior (quasi-self-ruling up until
1913), without sovereignty, which has been defrauded us
through reversibly discriminatory Civil Rights and
Affirmative Action acts, genocide and slow death awaits at
our front lawn. The descendants of the founders and rightful
heirs of the USA are hamstrung with race-abdicating, laws
that defy
the Constitution and unrightfully oppress
our children.
WE MUST START WITH A GOAL: OUR OWN COMMUNITIES
AND DEPEND UPON POLITICAL REVOLUTION (AT THIS POINT IT SEEMS
IT IS TOO LATE FOR OUR OWN GOVERNMENT BUT WE MUST REALIZE
AND PRACTICE THE RULE OF HOMOGENEITY
AND AUTONOMY)
Therefore, since we can not
expect full, moral change or equal political benefits from
our infidelic
inferiors (those not seeking multilateral, racial autonomy)
and oppressors, we must amicably
strive for a government for and by whites--we must work as a
unique body for the good of our particular people. As a
national suggestion, collectively, we might offer and
compromise part of our national land and inheritance to do
this, however, being especially politically and these days
even theologically controversial, it is a feasible
alternative to the current tyranny. In order to accomplish
this, we must make homogeneity and autonomy a goal, and
politically and legislatively obtain a separate division of
the nation (a geographic portion of the USA) for ourselves
and convince others of other subraces and groups to do the
same.
An act of arbitration to divide
and re-distribute America into homogeneous sectors would
be necessary. Although, the public and the country's
congressional will are no where near being persuaded to
resort to that type of development. If they were, America's
military and land could be divided into four parts: one for
Hispanics, Negroes, other non-fair-race peoples and the
American descendants of Northern Europe. Even if the
invading and oppressing, inferior (it only takes a rise in
standard for an inferior to become superior!) inhabitants
(themselves under futile, cabalic control) were permitted to
release us from the captivity of the current diversity
tyranny so as to allow us to freely dissolve the current
government and make our own new governments they would
require an attractive concession no doubt. We would have to
be willing to give up a satisfying amount of the national
land and property, but it would be worth it. The price of
freedom and homogeneity is not cheap.
It would benefit all races! There are groups
of different races that encourage their own communities now.
Another suggestive alternative would be
secession, but whites that have aggregate political power to
do this in certain parts may end up as relatively small
enclaves. However, this also would be better than suffering
without white political representation as we currently are.
We can not be productive and healthy as a people without
sovereignty and the freedom to develop. This deficit alone
is enough to make the country as a third world nation.
Whatever we may do, the sooner the better. The
complexion of our country is becoming less white every day
and our future concerning voting power is dimmer.
As we strive for survival among the present
anarchy, many of us conceding with Socialist
propaganda, consuming and enjoying bread while we have it,
other countries are gaining in military offensive power
while America has been said to be idling in its strategic
defense against a foreign preemptive attack. The issues for
whites of the USA are not foreign invasions, more taxes and
free health care or other non-sense we hear; the issue is
selfless discipline and the will to separate
ourselves so as to obtain homogeneous sovereignty that we
may survive as the jewel-like,
pure and fair race.
Lincoln's
intentions were not that the white people should be
ideologically hijacked and suffer desovereignization,
anti-superior position and miscegenation. He suggested
complete
separation of races and repatriation, not partial
desegregation (Jim
Crow). Integration had no part of the American
Dream.
(continue)
|