|
|
Divine Rights vs. Reverse Discrimination-pg. 8
However, racial concerns--the contemplation of advantages and disadvantages of opposing parties--have been an impediment to social allegiance. Also, there is a natural satisfaction experienced among a contending and disputing less prestigious group when the downfall of a renowned and prominent group occurs. The word "discrimination" has aroused passion among opposing parties previously and still does today. It is a minority buzz word. Nevertheless, it should not have caused animosity, raging and physical injury among people as in the riots of the sixties. Nor should it have threatened our justices to the point of changing their judgment, appeasing the riotous and abandoning the heir. However, that has not been the case. Politicians and justices were swayed by rioting, hate speech, dissent and media coverage to the point they departed from reasonable prudence and loyal foresight of administrative order and execution. From a more profound viewpoint, though more subtle, I've noticed for years that Jews and Italians or one of the Islamic nations while living in this country have always looked unto their own benefit before the Anglo Saxon's. Of course, from a psychological point of view that is natural because people are naturally selfish, even though all of their selfishness may not always be ratified by the government. However, to the contrary, against the natural desire and responsibility of government provision and protection of its heir, the judicial system has unnaturally--corruptly--promulgated unnatural law through imposed special interest, chaotic confusion, not reason. Even before and especially now, if Anglo Saxons--the legal heirs of the nation, look unto their own benefit, even in the country their ancestors founded, the USA, the antagonistic word "prejudicism" or "racism" may pop up. The words are so powerful that they have become subversive. Notwithstanding, Biblical segregation is a commendable good tradition: please, for the truth's and your own sake, if not for the sake of others also, don't be duped, dissuaded or diverted through calumniating and wresting buzz words! What do you think the people would say if you lived in Israel, Italy or Iran and you demanded economic preferential rights from them? Or if you imposed your desire to control busing for their school children? Regulation and control belongs to the benefit of the heir--not the non-heir! If such non-heirs are so zealous and faithful about such promotions, why don't they go to the country of their nationality and cultivate legislation there to that effect? But if they do not want to do that, then they should not want to overbearingly impose such exaggeration upon the USA and its heirs. I hope in the future loyalty to the heir is in the essence of reversing laws so as to provide for the descendants of the founders once again, but even if treachery prevails, we should not be naive--at least we should know about the dissenting and treasonous nature of the ones who perverted and subverted (changed) our national laws and caused greater disunity, recognizing that they bear their guilt. There are two types of discrimination: justifiable discrimination and unjustifiable! God is the only just one; therefore, His word, the Holy Bible, is the only authority concerning justice in all aspects of wisdom (Pr. 8:15) and philosophy. However, mercy gifts would be appropriate for the disadvantaged, not civil laws that increase the disadvantaged one and deprive the duly entitled one--a self-interest and desovereignization scheme not so slight so as to distort altruism, nor so arrogant as to totally repress the heir, but dictatorially efficacious so as to depreciate his inheritance. When inheritance policy is philosophically concentric with godly doctrine in respect to taking care of one's own first, whether it be a nation, family or individual, then a civil foundation for justice may be established. Many of the heirs in this country are jobless. Many are dejected from rejection as to honorable opportunities due to the Affirmative Action anti-favorable apportionment against us. Some are homeless. By the way, at one time from a Biblical standpoint, slavery existed in a form of employment by choice--a personal business adventure (Dt. 15:16, 17); however, even though slavery does not exist in the USA, at least by that term today, contrary to their will, many of the heirs are enslaved to the residue of opportunities left by the beneficiaries of Affirmative Action, and the cruelties of reverse discrimination. According to Dt. 15:12-18, a brother slave was to be set free in the seventh year unless he requested to keep his service. Therefore, the USA should set the descendants of its founders free and abolish Affirmative Action--it has been much more than six years!
|
|
|
|
Whole document Back to beginning About the Hesedken site Learn Hebrew
|
|