|
. |
Christian Club's Lori Bakker Exposé |
|
|
|
Lori Bakker has an admitted record (More Than I Could Ever Ask) of sexual promiscuity. She had many abortions also. If any of the men she had sex with is still alive, then biblically, she had no right to claim chastity or sexual cleanliness and marry Jim Bakker. No matter how much women try to excuse their sexual sins through the excuse of forgiveness, and then commit fornication or adultery, forgiveness does not equate chastity. Forgiveness changes the mental attitude, but it doesn't change the physical state. A defiled woman may be forgiven, but she must remain single. Clarification of No Defilement Necessary Any man or woman claiming to be a
Christian must be able to present a clean marital testimony, By the way, I did not buy Lori's book and would never knowingly contribute to a heretic promoting damnable heresy. Would Lori be surprised if she found out she may be in the same condition as the woman below, without chastity! It wasn't possible for the promiscuous woman below to have a God-approved marriage to begin with! Notice the misconception and deception of an unchaste woman trying to be faithful in marriage comparing the following statement: "After a faithful start to her second marriage...". Such misperception is completely against the biblical, virginity and chastity requirement. What a mockery of sanctity and purity by wearing a white wedding gown, denoting purity. Women must realize virginity matters! I absolutely think virginity matters. If the guy I end up deciding to marry isn't one, we can work through that, but it messes up females minds so much though, because in this super intimate moment where so many insecurities are exposed, you can't help but know that you are being compared to some past love. It's daunting. I personally have decided to stay a virgin until marriage. I made a video (click on my channel to see) to do with that because I have gotten so many negative responses. KayyPeaa Female virgins are wonderful women who can offer chastity to a man, a requirement for marriage. However, some female virgins are more wise than others. A virgin female can still end up in an unwanted situation by aiding her want-to-be-husband male to promote fornication (I Cor. 7:2) through former negligent conduct if she does not qualify his background. The parent or guardian of the female is responsible to have a trust relationship with his daughter so as to be able to give her to a man in faith, knowing she is chaste. However, the parent of the virgin is not as likely to have this trust relationship with the male she is to be given to. There are men who may not be legally married but have in their life time had sex with a female virgin. In these cases, the male would still be obligated to the first female virgin, especially if he had two or more female virgin experiences, whom he joined in coitus. Then, the delusional, male presumed groom-to-be really should be trying to resolve his responsibility with his first virgin and her chastity (to re-unite and legally marry as long as the female had not become defiled by another man), and realize he must remain single if he doesn't in order to prevent an illegitimate marriage with another female. We live in the apostasy and have lost the great protection of dowry and community living (homogeneous conditions), which guarded marriage (monogamy) and other Biblical institutions. So if a virgin female thinks everything is alright concerning marriage merely due to her own sexual purity, she better beware because she also has a responsibility not to become intrusive to a once-virgin seeking chastity and marital restoration with the presumptuously presumed groom-to-be of the present virgin. Another hypothetical situation to think about, having no interference to restoration as the former case, is the male who has legally but not legitimately married according to the Bible. If the male who has never had sex with a female virgin or chaste widow but knew (committed fornication or adultery) and married an unchaste woman or whore (1 Cor. 6:15) and then after righteous consideration decides to legally divorce (annul), and wants to marry a virgin, I don't see that the male would be obligated to the unchaste woman (Dt. 22:20, 21). However, as Kayypeaa said, it really would be a matter to mess up the mind of the female virgin, and she would be putting herself in a position to be compared with a past sexual love of the male. Women in the Old Testament were wives of polygamous men and had to think about the competitor wives of their husband. However, polygamy was replaced with monogamy in the New Testament. Hopefully, more males will be concerned about purity and keep their virginity. It would be great if the female virgins had a great number of males to be given (parental authority) to without having to worry about former male sex activity. More details... What is a biblical example of marriage? Virginity Search Engine
|
|
|
Female Purity: One-male Sexual Cognizance Factor and Reflection
|
||
|
Faith Enhanced by Intelligence Difference between Widow Marriage (I Cor. 7:39) and Remarriage Sexual Abstinence Determination Overcoming Error through Faith Women should help guard other women with men. Midwife and Anti-abusive Birth Gender-biased
Discernment |
Sexual cleanliness: One male-partner cognizance Adam and Eve experienced clean enlightenment and intellectually knew one another. Once a cognizant man has had sex with a woman in the way of pro-creation, he has been enlightened and can realize he “knew” the woman in a physical, intimate way, a way that is meant to be known only in agreement with God's plan of sexual cleanliness. The Old Testament Law (Torah) required (Ex. 22:16, Dt. 22:13-21, 28, 29) a woman that had first time sex whether by choice, seduction or rape to marry her first man (excluding miscegenation--those not genealogically and genetically belonging directly to the Hebrew subraces). Adam and Eve did not have any problem with uncleanness. Marriage was designed a unity that should not be broken. Divorce was not intended: Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. 9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. Adam and Eve experienced a new dimension of their physical usefulness through having sex. Adam's intellect was opened due to the experiment: “And Adam knew Eve his wife ...” (Gn. 4:1). Their union was honorable and undefiled (He. 13:4): “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” No one should break up a marital unity that is ordained of God. (However, note there were refusals of marriage and inheritance due to miscegenation in Ezra 10.) Widowhood and purity: One-male-partner cognizance "So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man" (Rom. 7:3). A pure widow and only having known one man (her former husband) is no longer bound as a wife (I Cor. 7:39) and has no current male-partner cognizance. A dead man is not cognizant. She is eligible for another marriage and has spiritual indemnity as far as sexual cleanliness is concerned. I Cor. 7: 39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord. 40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God. Sexual defilement: Two male-partner cognizance On the other hand, when a cognizant, married woman and a man other than her husband concur this realization of knowing each other in a defiled, pro-creative manner, the woman's mind no longer holds the intellectual purity of knowing only one, living, man anymore. Penetration of the vagina is an accepted opinion that would determine such defilement; however, actually the issue of discernment of sexual cleanliness bears upon the consciousness of the individuals involved. (Dry sex—no penetration of the vagina but rubbing the external vulva--out of marriage would be filthy but not as intimate. However, it may be enough for a man to refuse a woman. Purity and cleanliness must be stressed.) Her life, psychological and physical state becomes divided and unclean, leaving repentance and a life of sexual singleness as the only peaceful resolve. Rape of married woman: Defilement and two male-partner cognizance When rape of an innocent, married woman occurs, the rapist destroys not only the psychological and physical purity of the woman, but afflicts and devastates her husband and posterity to survive in cleanliness on their own. The victimized woman no longer can live as a wife to the father of the family. They must separate so as not to participate in coitus and defile the whole family. Cleanliness of the male husband must not be mixed with the uncleanliness of the defiled wife. Of course, the victimized wife should still be loved as always and respected for her screaming and resistance against the rape. Perhaps a separate room may be given to her, helping her live a single life without sex. Rape of a virgin: One male-partner cognizance According to the Old Testament, when rape of a virgin occurred, if the daughter had already been given (betrothed), the rapist concurred the death penalty. The daughter would have been expected to resist with vocal expression (screaming) to prove her will at any cost to maintain her dignity. On the other hand, when rape of a non-betrothed virgin occurred, she was required to marry the rapist if her father so desired. Obviously he would have only accepted a male with similar genetic attributes as others of the homogeneous community. (Please acknowledge this rule did not violate the genetic, race prescription in Nu: 36:5-13. Also, note the intolerance of the attempted, inter-racial marriage of Dinah, and the sharing of posterity of Ishmael by Sarah. Racial and cultural homogeneity is expected to be preserved.) This sexual assault may have been considered a great loss to the female victim, but if the sexual aggressor was a boyfriend or someone that the father accepted as a good man but just couldn't handle his sexual appetite at the time, he may have been obligated to approve it. Nevertheless, the father has the authority to finalize the decision as to marriage according to particular circumstances of seduction. See the links on rape and dowry in the side column. Remarriage, divorce and return to former husband (Dt. 24.4): Defilement and two male-partner cognizance When a woman remarries, which was permitted under some circumstances in the Old Covenant but not in the New Covenant, she loses her previous one male-partner cognizance status. It would be an abomination for the former husband to receive her. They both, the former husband and the divorced wife, would know that she has not purity and a one male-partner cognizance status. Deuteronomy 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. 2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. 3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; 4 Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance. Has Lori and Jim really proven themselves as following God through works of sexual cleanliness, and are their works proven not of physical defilement and fornication, a work of the flesh (Galatians 5:19)? Did Lori ever attempt to explain her ill relationships with men and how she thinks she was not physically defiled and obligated to stay single? Would not Joseph had put Mary, the mother-to-be, away if the angel had not instructed him. Lori impliedly was put away or left on her own--having several abortions--before she married Jim. What makes her think she has a right to hook up again with another man, Jim, without proving widow chastity? Look at their works folks!
|
|
