Jewish Genetic Identity Ommission: Fakeness/Disingenuity

“But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.” (Gn. 17:21, KJV) If you will notice throughout the Old Testament, the lineage of Abraham was patrilineal, not matrilineal. If it were matrilineal, could not have Hagar, the mother of Ishmael, claimed her son as “Abrahamic” and part of the covenant? Similarly, the non-Hebrew Jewish of our day claim to be part of a covenant through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but they do not have genetic or genalogical credentials to agree with that. They claim their Jewishness from strange women who bore them: some Semitic, some Japhethic, some Hamitic and some mixed but none of them are Hebrew, the designated people of the covenant (Gn. 17:2).

Even before the law of Moses, God had established the moral of racial exclusion and the institution of homogeneity among the nations at the Tower of Babel and eventually at the separation of Ishmael, which implemented the calling of the people of God through Isaac. Intra-racial marriage and dispensational fulfillment:

Moses, who did not marry a Hebrew, later in Nu. 36 commanded the children of Israel to follow strict patrilineal rules on both sides (male and female) of the marriage intra-tribally; formerly, he had not even followed these rules in his own marriage. Also Ruth's marriage was not the norm and deviated on the matrilineal side even after the law (Nu. 36: 5-13) was given. However, significantly, her marriage was patrilineal on Boaz's (her husband) side and their posterity were considered heirs. As Ruth's desendants were not totally Hebrew and against the norm of the commandment of Moses, she nevertheless obtained patrilineal inheritance of her children through her husband. Jesus Christ similarly obtained patrilineal inheritance through encouragement of an angel and adoption of Joseph.

So, Abraham's succession was patrilineal through Isaac, Jacob and the genealogies we have in the Scripture. Genealogy and inheritance was never matrilineal in the Scriptures, including any part of the written torah. Abraham's descendancy was extended through King David of Israel: “Howbeit the LORD would not destroy the house of David, because of the covenant that he had made with David, and as he promised to give a light to him and to his sons for ever.” (2 Chronicles 21:7, KJV)

Time progressed and Israel committed many marital inter-racial sins after the exile to Babylon. The people who had inter-married were rebuked and the law was restored with the Covenant of Ezra. The foreign women from Babylon who married the Hebrew men did not obtain an inheritance as Ruth did. God has guided and reproved his people throughout history. Spiritual development has occurred through dispensations; for instance, the giving of the law and the making of covenants. (Romans 9:4-7) Eventually the New Covenant dispensation began with the Lord Jesus Christ and is fulfilling now.

At the time of Matthew there were Hebrew people, people who had patrilineal inheritance in Israel (Numbers 36:5-13), in Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim. James 1:1 proves that there were twelve Hebrew tribes united after the time of Jesus Christ also. Even though there had been a former carrying-away by Assyria, all the faithful of the Hebrew tribes in Jesus the Christ were brought together through the light of Jesus Christ.

Today, it seems you can't find any Hebrews anywhere. It is because they most likely became totally extinct. Science and theology work together. You must understand genetics in order to understand the bible. Genealogy is an important requirement also. If you were to walk down a street in Jerusalem and ask 100 people if their father has patrilineal inheritance I don't think you could find one that would tell you yes. You could ask a thousand and not find one. There are no known Hebrews, especially with required genealogy of the Torah. Herzl matrilinealism is not justified by Ezra or Moses. Nehemiah separated Hebrews from non-Hebrews (people who did not have patrilineal inheritance). Such deviate, matrilinealism of modern Israel is an algorithm for Hebrew genocide. So, what happened to the people (non-Hebrews and anti-Hebrews) living in Israel today is not the fault of the writers Matthew and James.

Ezra 2.62 requires a priest to have patrilineal genealogical records, which of course no modern Jewish person has.

61 And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name:

62 These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood. (KJV)

If the modern, non-Hebrew “Jewish” claim they are Jews, they must prove they have Hebrew genetic and genealogical credentials. They cannot do that because the Hebrews have become extinct.

The Greek Septuagint has much older translations of the Hebrew Scripture in their time than the Masoretic text. Every eclectic Torah student must recognize the power of parallel languages. Thank the one reverently called Κύριε for that!

If the non-Hebrew Jewish claim they are Jews and make an excuse that Ruth was not Hebrew, their argument does not nullify the patrilineal rule. Ruth was blessed and an exception to the rule of Numbers 36:5-13. Through Boaz, nevertheless, her children obtained patrilineal succession--a necessity to be a Hebrew and have tribal/national inheritance.

She was an accepted Moabite even though women of other lands were not acceptable: "And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:" (Nehemiah 10:30) "Know for a certainty that the LORD your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the LORD your God hath given you." (Joshua 23:13) So, even though Ruth was blessed through the patrilineal law and Boaz, the non-Hebrew women that returned from Babylon did not receive such grace.

In Ezra a covenant was made: The faithful put away their non-Hebrew, illegitimate wives and children. "Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law" (Ezra 10:3). (See) 1 Esdras 9:36 "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children." (The King James Version Apocrypha). Today, in modern Israel, there cannot anyone be found with Hebrew patrilineal succession, no priests with the required genealogy, and the children of the occupiers of the land are as polluted (yegoahlu): Ezra 2: 61-63. They cannot produce a Hebrew messiah, which we know has already come—the Lord Jesus Christ, who had patrilineal succession (Matthew 1).

No, matrilineal law and the oral Torah is not sufficient. For instance, Yevamot 77b does not have the authority of the written torah. The Moabite rule did not apply only to men as some propose so as to accept female racial/tribal miscegenation: for at least one reason because that would contradict the commandment of Numbers 36:5-13, Nehemiah 10:30, the warning of Ezra 10:14, and the covenant and law (Ezra 10:3), which gave amicable expulsion to non-Hebrew women. Having said that, the oral torah is useful in some ways, but not all. It is inconsistent. It is contradictory at times. Some of the commentators may be wise and others not. Good doctrine cannot be established in a quantity of words of commentators who cannot agree with one another (50 volumes or so more than the bible); it must be established upon the authoritative, written torah.

We live in prophetic days and knowledge has increased, but so has myth and delusion. Nations and leaders have been deceived and mixed their peoples. The Balfour Declaration and the precluding delusion is evidence of it. Today, the USA gives huge amounts of money to a people without genetic identity and who are not a Hebrew people but foolishly assumes the myth that they are a blessed people of God! Will the non-Hebrew Jewish present a messiah of their own? Lord, have mercy on us. Amen.

Links:

Non-Hebrew Jewish Molestation Of Numbers 36:5-13

Patrilineal Law Prerequisite

Ranks Of Racial Homogeneity

Tower Of Babel: Development Of Three Races

Japhethic Race And Noah's Blessing

Ruth

Numbers 36:5-13

Hebrew Patrilineal Succession Requirement

Singer Isaiah Misinterpretation

Warning To The Hebrews: Loss Of Their Posterity

Oral Torah Failure