Why Whites Must Control Their Census
Understanding The Spiritual, Religious, Genealogical and Genetic Significance


Abraham Lincoln wanted a white nation: " ... no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks." (Abraham Lincoln: Speeches at Charleston, September 18, 1858) Similarly and prescribed through the Torah (Nu. 36:5-13), the Hebrews of Ruth's time wanted a Hebrew nation. Ruth, although a Moabitess and Semitic but not a biological Hebrew, as a non-Hebrew immigrant respected the racial will of the Hebrews. She did not invent “matrilineal law” and attempt to circumvent the Torah (Ruth 4:18-22). She did not demand Moabitic civil rights nor uplift their unGodly culture. Rather, as a great model for Christians, she converted to Hebrew thought and respected their racial inheritance and succession laws. She respected good religion, religion that was congruent with the Hebrews. She was blessed and accepted among God's people to be a builder of Israel as Rachel and Leah (Ruth 4:11). She learned, adapted and became one with the people.

Many people that have come to the US have been blessed by the nation founded by Separatists (Puritans and others), who had a built-in desire to protect their people and community, white people as themselves. This was similar to the Hebrews, who provide for their own race and culture. The people of different races than the founders of the USA were expected to regard and respect the race of the founders so as to take part of their generosity and blessings, some even as slaves and others as freemen with skills due to the earned release, which was a part of slavery law. Previously, some Hebrews were slaves of fellow Hebrews. Slavery was an economic mechanism and some Hebrews themselves chose to be slaves rather than suffer making it on their own in such a competitive world. The world didn't have air conditioning and the luxuries it has today.

However, there is a psychological and spiritual matter as to much contention about race and the respect of the race of the founders today in the US even though the slavery laws were changed and generally, hypocritically reversed with Affirmative Action. People seemingly didn't dissolve an institution of God completely, they just changed its form so as to punish the descendants of the founders. Nevertheless, antagonists against the founder race of our time do not regard the Bible nor want or have a desire to be respectful of the race of the founders, much different than the immigration attitude of Ruth of the Bible. Perhaps they are ungrateful and have their own agenda they want to follow. The sister of Ruth was like these people but she didn't go with Ruth, Naomi and the Hebrews, she went back to her own land. She liked her own race and people so much more than the Hebrews and their good religion that she went back to her own country. She repatriated. To the contrary, the antagonists in the US contend, but do they ever go back to their own like the sister of Ruth? Why not? I believe Abraham Lincoln answered that in his repatriation address.

Now, back to foundation theology, as to genealogy and genetics: A person that has a phenotype that features a Japhethic trait but does not have white skin as a N. European may have to look into his or her family genealogy for further study. Nevertheless, a person of two different races, for instance, a Japhethic and Semitic or Japhethic and Hamitic person can use the dominant/sub-dominant race method to calculate his or her percentage of each race through genealogy. Phenotype alone usually works generally, but genealogy and DNA studies can take it further. Genealogy even goes back to Adam and Eve, the progenitors of all mankind. All people are related in some sense evern though they have been scattered among many nations and peoples. Collectively, you can notice some are similar and others different, giving evidence of their generations of a separate, genetic culture. Skin color does not give the full picture. Bone structure, IQ, personality traits and other factors are a part of race and genetics, but phenotype works generally very well as to getting a general idea of the genetic make-up of a person. By the way, no one today can be a Hebrew or Jew. Hebrew law demands that a Hebrew person have a continuous (no miscegenation or broken genealogical chain) patrilineal register (Nu. 36:5-13, Ezra 2:61-63). Recorded religious law (Numbers 36:5-13) gives evidence to the wise that the so-called “Jewish” fail the Hebrew requirements to be part of their genealogical race and disallows them to any inheritance in the land. The Herzl Matrilinealists changed this very important Hebrew law among themselves so as it would not expose their lack of Hebrew genealogy and identity. Many unlearned Christians have been deceived by the myth that the “Jewish” are Jews, and the world is being led by deceivers, turning things upside down through deception. Israel and God's real estate has been taken by genealogical frauds!

Summing up a subject (race, genealogy, genetics and census) that can take volumes to discuss it, the USA was founded by the white race, Northern Europeans, specifically, the English. They were assisted by the French and Germans to a great degree, and some other Japhethic (white) peoples. Actually, some non-N. Europeans, the Indian tribes and Blacks, fought for Americans (Patriots) and some for the British (Loyalists). Nevertheless, the contended government became a union and nation among divided peoples, with, of course, the Whites being the dominant people.

The clause, "All men are created equal" was a declaration from a man who had lived in the new state of Virginia, a white who had grown up in the new land and became a Patriot legal administrator and spoke in the same language of and to the white British legal administrators validating in his short clause that white men from England and their descendants who had become American Patriots and were in the making of their own nation had the right to make America the United States as well as England had a right to make and rule their own country. Slavery of non-whites was in existence at that time in America. Thomas Jefferson made the declaration and he was an owner of slaves at that time, he was absolutely not including slaves as being equal to the white man. America was not founded on upside-downism and liberalism on steroids, it was founded upon natural dignity of the white man, including the rights of dominion and his race.

Esau and Jacob were not equal. Non-whites were not considered equals in early America, and rightfully so. The Hebrews did not count their Hebrew slaves as equals to themselves although they provided better benefits for them than other slaves. Racial preference is a natural right.

Today, we hear distortions of abstract thought, especially as to the above quoted Jefferson clause. Of course, God wishes all to be saved, regardless of his background, regardless of his color, genealogy or genetics. Nevertheless, racial and lingual restrictions have been a necessity of government since the scattering at the Tower of Babel. This idea has been promoted since the Puritans and separatists in America. Race, genetics and genealogy have biblical roots and are complimented with their own culture and religion. Early American census accounts were not disloyal to this homogeneity and privilege concept. Nevertheless, the idea of better benefits for the favored race, has naturally always been from the time of Noah and his three sons, Shem, Japheth and Ham (whom we all derived from one of the progenitors of the three races), unto the scattering at the Tower of Babel unto the Hebrew law of Moses and unto the anti-miscegenation covenant of Ezra, and until today. Race must be protected. Race is sacred. It is genealogical, genetic and spiritual (Genesis 9:27), and has required register among the Hebrews and civilized nations. Records of genealogy should be kept among all peoples. Not to say that some may have so many progenitors of another race that they have lost their dominant-race status and may be considered merely bi-racial or tri-racial, but nevertheless, as I mentioned previously, phenotype usually is sufficient to recognize the dominant sub-race of any Japhethic (white), Semitic (red as King David was described), or Hamitic (black) person.

Did the Hebrews have a right to demand genealogical register and proof of the Hebrew race to be a priest? Of course they did. Did the Hebrews have a right to give better benefits to the Hebrew slaves than the non-Hebrew slaves? Of course they did. People of a race have a right to prefer their own race. It is simple. It doesn't have to be something generally decided by a DNA test, it is something that is decided naturally. Did the USA and its founders and people have a right to prefer their own race? Of course they did.

Beware. We are living in times when the those who promote unnatural and contrary things to the direction and laws of God are on the rise. Race is an element of Christian religion. Anti-Christians and nihilists have withstood our religion by calling us “racists” in a derogatory way. They have failed God and do not want to serve him, they rather go their own way as the sister of Ruth, but worse as the son of Joiada, whom Nehemiah contended with. They want to tear down the divine and blessed, separatist, racial establishment. Those who say race and sub-race does not exist are deceived.