Furthermore, the seed of Abraham believe the Scriptures, not the Quran or other books that do not concede that Israel belongs to God and the seed (faithful) of Abraham.

Israel followed the theme of apartheid when it left Egypt--it separated from the wicked rule of Pharaoh. It separated from the mixed people in Nehemiah. It separated the unwarranted wives and children to restore the law at the congregation of Ezra. Israel separated itself at times throughout the ages to not become polluted with non-Torahian ideology. Apartheid is necessary at times for rule, repentance and restoration of a society and nation.

Former Justice Minister Tzipi Livni erringly proposed that it would be in the Zionist's interest for a two-state solution. (I personally think she seems likable and friendly, and may mean well at times, and at other times I don't think she is competent according to some of her statements, especially concerning dividing the land, which is not hers to give anyway. By the way, she looks beautifully part Japhethic/white, not fully Semitic.) She has no right whatsoever to suggest giving God's land to a religiously deluded people that do not respect the Torah, and as her have no legitimate racial qualities either.

Even though some current Palestinians may be Semitic, they have not followed the patrilineal law of the Hebrews, and do not genetically and genealogically qualify as heirs. One drop of Semitic blood may signify that a person has Shem, the son of Noah, as an ancient progenitor. However, that by no means is enough in itself to qualify as an heir of the land of Israel. Ishmael, the son of Abraham, had more than a drop of Semitic blood and could not qualify. The young rejects (children of the non-Hebrew women) at the Ezran congregation had more than one drop of Semitic blood; they were disqualified. As Moses directed, Numbers 36: 5-13 gives us the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and antigenocide law.

Therefore, Israeli apartheid is more relevant and just than making an issue of dividing Israel and sinning against God for the sake of Joos or so-called Palestine having its own rule. The latter's demographic and religious constituency determines it at best a potential subculture of apartheid Israel, and then under the condition that it must recognize Hebrew sovereignty. Islam in Jerusalem and Israel is anciently and culturally unnatural, and against the Torah. Mohammed's madness and his followers' usurpation is an affront to God as well as the Joo conspiracy.

Separation is necessary for the ruling class in any area with different peoples and cultures; without it, the superior people suffer, and eventually the whole region will deteriorate into chaos. The USA is an excellent example of how apartheid worked for America before the Civil War, after the abuse of southern whites during the Reconstruction and during the “Jim Crow” years. During the ante-Luxury Rights/Civil Rights era, whites prospered. They had peace, safe neighborhoods, employment, prosperity, world respect and admiration. Many black families had two parents and a supporting father. The virtue of working and raising a family had not been destroyed. However, since “Jim Crow” was overthrown more babies may have been aborted than men and women were killed in Russia and Germany during WW II. The streets are dreaded and accursed through wickedness, lawlessness, unnaturalism and oppressive non-homogeneity. Murder of blacks by blacks is at a rampant rate.

Many Jewish people unrighteously protested homogeneous prosperity and aided the NWO and demonic elite to overthrow American and other civilized regions, states or nations. It seems the chickens may be coming home to roost as the Jewish are realizing Palestinians and Gazans aren't very respectful toward their brutal hypocrisy. There is currently a question of apartheid and security concerning a bus issue between the settlers and the Palestinians. Eventually, the anti-Christian existentialists may side with the Palestinians and cause grief to the native Jewish in Israel. Nevertheless, the Christian view is not to return evil for evil as the Jewish did unto them in the USA and other lands, but to return good for evil and promote apartheid, and good, not evil. Israel, regardless of social issues, must not be butchered, nor given to any non-Hebrew tribes. That includes the occupiers also, the Jewish proselytes of Herzl matrilinealism, who directly oppose patrilineal law and an inherent part of being Hebrew and a member of the tribe of Judah. The Balfour Declaration was not well thought out. It was unwarranted.

Racial and cultural homogeneity is the pertinent issue for the land of the tribes of Israel. Let me repeat: Numbers 36: 5-13 gives us the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and antigenocide law.

Any peoples living within these tribal jurisdictions (although not legally established at this time) would be expected to be required to honor Hebrew sovereignty or reasonably demanded to find somewhere else to live. Therefore, those that would choose to stay and are not Hebrew should expect to be treated under rules of apartheid and subjective peace, not continue as a competing religion or people. It is not what the Israeli can do for the Palestinian, nor what the Palestinian can do for the Israeli, but what Gentile Israelis (twelve non-existent tribes and adherents) can do for the Torah and future Israel (Christians--the Israel of God--Galatians 6:15, 16).