Israeli Apartheid and Hebrew Sovereignty






Israeli Apartheid and One State Solution
(Moses' Law vs Herzl Zionism--Matrilineal Gender-replacement Theology and Islamic Division:
It Would Be a Theological Sin to Recognize and Accept the Religion of Islam or Palestine as a State)


Apartheid is already in place.” However, adjustments of both parties toward repentance and following the Torah (law) are needed.

Israel is a God-given land to the faithful. Abraham (avraham avinu) had descendants that were given strict rules concerning the perpetuity of racial and cultural homogeneity (Numbers 36:5-13). Although the Hebrews were expelled from the land, this even in itself did not give right to other nations or peoples to exploit the tragedy of the dispersed Hebrews. Obadiah spoke directly about this.

Sarah, Abraham's wife, was faithful also as to protective isolation of their descendants.

Ge. 21:9 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. 10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. 11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham’s sight because of his son. 12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called. 13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed.

The bondwoman's son was given to become a nation also; however, his nation was not Israel, the land of the Hebrews. So, there is no validation for non-Hebrew peoples claiming part of Israel as a place to make a nation/state. Furthermore, the seed of Abraham believe the Scriptures, not the Quran or other books that do not concede that Israel belongs to God and the seed (faithful) of Abraham.

Israel followed the theme of apartheid when it left Egypt--it separated from the wicked rule of Pharaoh. It separated from the mixed people in Nehemiah. It separated the unwarranted wives and children to restore the law at the congregation of Ezra. Israel separated itself at times throughout the ages to not become polluted with non-Torahian ideology. Apartheid is necessary at times for rule, repentance and restoration of a society and nation.

Former Justice Minister Tzipi Livni erringly proposed that it would be in the Zionist's interest for a two-state solution. (I personally think she seems likable and friendly, and may mean well at times, and at other times I don't think she is competent according to some of her statements, especially concerning dividing the land, which is not hers to give anyway. By the way, she looks beautifully part Japhethic/white, not fully Semitic.) She has no right whatsoever to suggest giving God's land to a religiously deluded people that do not respect the Torah, and have no legitimate racial qualities either.

Even though some current Palestinians may be Semitic, they have not followed the patrilineal law of the Hebrews, and do not genetically and genealogically qualify as heirs. One drop of Semitic blood may signify that a person has Shem, the son of Noah, as an ancient progenitor. However, that by no means is enough in itself to qualify as an heir of the land of Israel. Ishmael, the son of Abraham, had more than a drop of Semitic blood and could not qualify. The young rejects (children of the non-Hebrew women) at the Ezran congregation had more than one drop of Semitic blood; they were disqualified. As Moses directed, Numbers 36: 5-13 gives us the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and antigenocide law.

Therefore, Israeli apartheid is more relevant and just than making an issue of dividing Israel and sinning against God for the sake of so-called Palestine having its own rule. The latter's demographic and religious constituency determines it at best a potential subculture of apartheid Israel, and then under the condition that it must recognize Hebrew sovereignty. Islam in Jerusalem and Israel is anciently and culturally unnatural, and against the Torah. Mohammed's madness and his followers' usurpation is an affront to God.

Separation is necessary for the ruling class in any area with different peoples and cultures; without it, the superior people suffer, and eventually the whole region will deteriorate into chaos. The USA is an excellent example of how apartheid worked for America before the Civil War, after the abuse of southern whites during the Reconstruction and during the “Jim Crow” years. During the pre-Luxury Rights/Civil Rights era, whites prospered. They had peace, safe neighborhoods, employment, prosperity, world respect and admiration. Many black families had two parents and a supporting father. The virtue of working and raising a family had not been destroyed. However, since “Jim Crow” was overthrown more babies may have been aborted than men and women were killed in Russia and Germany during WW II. The streets are dreaded and accursed through wickedness, lawlessness, unnaturalism and oppressive non-homogeneity. Murder of blacks by blacks is at a rampant rate.

Many Jewish people unrighteously protested homogeneous prosperity and aided the NWO and demonic elite to overthrow American and other civilized regions, states or nations. It seems the chickens may be coming home to roost as the Jewish are realizing Palestinians and Gazans aren't very respectful toward their brutal hypocrisy. There is currently a question of apartheid and security concerning a bus issue between the settlers and the Palestinians. Eventually, the anti-Christian existentialists may side with the Palestinians and cause grief to the native Jewish in Israel. Nevertheless, the Christian view is not to return evil for evil as the Jewish did unto them in the USA and other lands, but to return good for evil and promote apartheid, and good, not evil. Israel, regardless of social issues, must not be butchered, nor given to any non-Hebrew tribes. That includes the occupiers also, the Jewish proselytes of Herzl matrilinealism, who directly oppose patrilineal law and an inherent part of being Hebrew and a member of the tribe of Judah. The Balfour Declaration was not well thought out. It was unwarranted.

Racial and cultural homogeneity is the pertinent issue for the land of the tribes of Israel. Let me repeat: Numbers 36: 5-13 gives us the Israelite prescription for race and demographics: Intra-tribal marital, inheritance and antigenocide law.

Any peoples living within these tribal jurisdictions (although not legally established at this time) would be expected to be required to honor Hebrew sovereignty or reasonably demanded to find somewhere else to live. Therefore, those that would choose to stay and are not Hebrew should expect to be treated under rules of apartheid and subjective peace, not continue as a competing religion or people. It is not what the Israeli can do for the Palestinian, nor what the Palestinian can do for the Israeli, but what Gentile Israelis (twelve non-existent tribes and adherents) can do for the Torah and future Israel (Christians--the Israel of God--Galatians 6:15, 16).



Links:

The Temple And World Deceiver

Fraudulent, Matrilineal Gender-replacement And Golden Scalpel Circumcision Theology

Jewish Myth

God's Judgment Upon A Defiled Land (Isaiah 24:5)

The Jewish Are Not Jews/Hebrews

Karl Marx And White Hatred

Learn How To Distinguish Between Race And Culture

Ungratefulness Failure of Sub-dominant Race

What Is Democracy Really! (View of how a Protocol of Zion targets government)

Tzipi Livni: Two-state Sin

Solving Racial and Cultural Homogeneity in Israel

Invitation for Jewish Conversion to Christianity

Lofven: NWO Threat of Racial Nihilism

Shem, Japheth and Ham

Jesus Will Rule in Jerusalem

Hebrew Genealogical and Genetic Requirements

The Ezran Expulsion of Mixed Peoples

Nehemiah: Separating Mixed Peoples

Hebrew Demographics: Moses

Fables

Non-Jewish Hebrew Genetics Heretics: David Duke

Solving Racial and Cultural Homogeneity in Israel

Settle: History and Principles

Black Hate Crime Against Little Child: Post-"Civil" Rights America





Home Page

At least