|
|
Morality of German Racial Homogeneity and Autonomy VS Anti-Christian Genocide Obviously, the Israelis, a non-Hebrew people, have wanted to expand their disputed territory and claim it as their own. They have no biblical inheritance to it and neither do the Palestinians, now victims of a genocide. Righteous ethnic cleansing such as when the Jews separated the “Jewish” has been perverted and turned into a form of tyrannous expansion. As to Meirsheimer's thoughts on morality and Hitler, it must be noticed that Germany had been given a horrible deal as to the Treaty of Versailles after WW I. Hitler attempted to recover the unfair losses. If Poland would have given the German people back, Hitler may not have went to war with them. Churchill was not a very good man to have to deal with either. Regardless, war among men is never pretty in every way. Not long after the Herzl movement, Russia was taken over with a Communist government and the United States had lost its country to a foreign enterprise through the Federal Reserve Bank. All things were working together for the anti-Christians, and the Japhethic peoples lost their centuries-long, world-wide hegemony. (At one time, Americans and Europeans rightfully thought race was sacred.) Previous to the disasters, Karl Marx had promoted his faction. Through a bought dinosaur, media, the global political emphasis sway waned from White racial genetics to anti-Christian religion (Herzl Matrilinealism) and racial diversity, a form of religious schizophrenia so to speak, over the last couple of centuries. Nevertheless, even though Hitler may not have been very religious, he did regard racial and cultural homogeneity as very important. Many nations and Christians (Philippians 4:8) have been perverted and lost this virtue.
Links: Israelis: Proselytes of Terror Depraved Art of Ethnic Cleansing Moral of Racial and Cultural Homogeneity
|
|
|
|
|
|