Mission Life: The Deterioaration of the American Founder-heir

Ahab has been recognized for his lack of doing things he should have. He was a passive man. He provoked God. As Ahab, so called, “Christian” men are not taking care of business. They are provoking God and the righteous. They are allowing unclean wives in their homes. Pastors are marrying off known, unchaste women to men. Women are no longer concerned about wearing long hair or scarves. Whorish women are ruling and influencing weak men. Some even lead church gatherings.

Our ministries have become money and attention grabbers, not real givers of the gospel. Authors are selling books. Schools are encouraging our own students to become debtors. Many times the alien may be offered a lower fee for advanced schooling in our universities among many other advantages than the founder-heir. Churches are using raffles and “win” devices.

The Mission Houses: Political-correctness Denial VS The Rehabilitation Progress of the American Founder-heir

Not all homeless are addicted people

What hope is there for suffering men, descendants of white, founder-heir Americans, who do not have the benefit of Affirmative Action for a good job opportunity! If a person doesn't take care of his own, he is considered worse than an infidel. If America's churches don't care about the continuance of the descendants of those who founded the country but rather care more so about its aliens and illegals... how bad off can the country get! Is New World Order political-correctness replacing Godliness? When doctors will turn down a white poor man in need of medical help because he does not have the money to pay for the service but will provide free medical service (through government aid) and then even go out of their way and furthermore offer personal care to help an alien, should we call that altruistic, Christian discipleship or treachery? When our families adopt aliens and those not of our own subrace, should we call that adoption or treachery? When churches deny founder-heir and subrace prosperity, marital cleanliness and male leadership in the churches, what prospect do its suffering men have!

Mission houses for the homeless require sermon listening before getting a place to stay—offering the gospel for a price of a place to stay for returning the ministry some theological or philosophical attention. This is a disgrace to the name of Christ to train speakers to offer teaching in this way. For instance, the homeless, drunks and drug addicts are not given shelter if they don't accept the offer. Notwithstanding, forced attention does not usually alleviate the ignorance of God among such desperate people. People need to make their own decision through Christian leading and their own will, their own choice. They must be inspired through the gospel and grace of God alone. Jesus never offered his listeners material reward for them to listen to him, and neither is there an account of the apostles and prophets doing such things. Giving must be done in the virtue of giving, not materialism, not purchasing or charging for attendance.

On the other hand, Christian drug rehabs make an offer to their clients and prospects and of course room and board is included. The prospect makes his own decision to give attention to the way of thinking of someone else in hope of receiving help to be delivered from a state of addiction and deterioration. However, the homeless shelters offer similarly a bed and meal (at least some do) but the prospects may not be sincere about their decision as to wanting bible studies or being preached to; they may merely want a place to stay. So, they shouldn't be forced to make such decisions if they don't really think they appreciate the ideological influence under such conditions, especially among hedonistic people that may curse, act belligerently, try to get high on a substance, or involve themselves in some other negativity, and when those teaching support the heresies of our time and receive benefits and contributions from morally failing churches.

This really only supports heresy, not true teaching. The churches using the name of Christ are doing and not doing things their own materialistic way, not the way of the Scriptures. Most of them are set up in a way to escape taxes, which does not give them the allowance to freely comply with homogenous living and nationalism promotion. They would be susceptible to law suits. Compromise is the answer for them, not Christ.

Since the Civil War, we do not have the likeness of Christian husbandry in any great degree anymore; we have a more centralized economy making gain through usury and extortion. Many homeless are not suffering from substance abuse and addiction but rather economic helplessness, caused by the deterioration and overthrow of the former heir freedom and better economic conditions. Even under the current, severe economy and political situation, mission houses or communities may still repent and learn the practice of sincere giving. They may learn the good tradition of racial and cultural homogeneity and community working together as a group. This would be a way for the group member not to be made an economic slave to the usury and extortion system. If it gathered enough members, it could even have political influence and rival American Socialism and Communism.

Suggestions for mission houses and communities:

#1 Women are supposed to have long hair or wear a scarf and not teach men

#2 Men are supposed to teach them this

#3 Jesus never offered his listeners material reward for them to listen to him. Giving must be done in the virtue of giving, not materialism, not purchasing or charging for theological attendance (forcing to go to Bible studies).

#4 Many founder-heirs are suffering from economic problems due to debt-based economics--lack of homogeneous, Christian husbandry and nationalism

#5 Many surrounding churches are heretical and their contributions may not be able to be accepted

#6 Who is more inviting to listen to: a cult member or a heretic?

Open this video to its full size and check out the links in the description box.

Virgil Goode: Manly and reasonable hope of balancing debt right away; great Green Card proposal