|
|
DIVORCED FORNICATRESS FALSELY THINKS SHE IS MARRIED This beautiful woman is suffering from distorted views about biblical marriage and divorce. The mainstream churches leave people disillusioned. She had premarital sex before she met her now divorced so-called by her "husband". However, he had a right to annul the fornication-marriage with her because she was merely committing fornication with him. It was not a new covenant marriage. This type of circumvention is condemned in Deuteronomy 22:21. After all Gideon had done for Israel, they spiritually fornicated and followed a false covenant (Judges 8:33). Many Christians have been taught the good things of Jesus but have been influenced and deceived by the pre-trib and fornication cult, and are deceiving others! A woman must have virginity to offer a husband unless she is a chaste widow, and she did not have that. So, she should have let him annul their state of fornication, which was not a chaste and biblical marriage. Let me break this down for you: I am a Christian and encouraged by God to help others develop and prosper through growth in learning God's principles of sanctity. Marriage is an institution based upon the principle of chastity, not fornication or adultery. Female virginity and sexual chastity for marriage has been established since the Old Covenant (Ex. 22:16, Dt. 22:13-21, 28, 29): The once virgin female partner no longer has a justifiable opportunity to have sex with anyone else as long as her first male sex partner is alive--to do so would commit fornication. She admitted that she had pre-marital sex. Therefore, she should apologize to the man she brought into a legal marriage and divorce, which was not an acceptable biblical marriage. Going around and circumventing chastity received a death penalty for the immorality folly in the Old Covenant. See my sermon "Illusion". Abandoned (defiled) or divorced females are required to remain single and sexually abstinent. This now single woman should realize that she was unchaste and did not have a right to marry the man she later “legally” married and divorced. She is required to live single now and she should take off the ring she is not worthy of wearing. Divorced males (from their once virgin or chaste widow) are required to remain single and sexually abstinent also but her man did not marry a virgin or chaste widow when he married her, so he may have had options when he left. Let us keep people like this in prayer that God will open up her understanding and she will get inline with what the Bible teaches, amen. Thanks. Links: Options after separation from a cultural marriage without biblical founding Suicide is never the answer Beware of the term “covenant marriage”
|
|
|
|
|
|