Reasoning With God And Nationality

Thinking in 0's And 1's

If you are a programmer you probably use logic to accomplish your work. An emotion doesn't make the algorithms work without first using logic. To begin with, you need a premise to count from. When you count and add one after zero, you know you are at one. To reason with God you must have a premise to apply logic and reason. That premise is the Holy Scriptures. To understand how the creation was made and nations came about, the Bible is our history book.

How Righteous Nationality Began

Wicked nations and peoples have existed in the new world since the time of Babel, after Noah. Noah was blessed of God and communicated with him. His descendants who lived by faith were blessed also. However, many people went their own way, and did not follow God. Eventually, Abraham, a descendant of Noah as we all are, was instructed by God (Genesis 11:1-12:3). People who followed God and Abraham were blessed. Christians have a spiritual identity in Jesus Christ with him, and they are lights (even bearing political and demographic, racial-succession identity) in the dark countries that they sojourn. They give the light of faith of the commandments and good traditions (including homogeneity) of God even as the faithful woman of Canaan.

The Beginning Of Righteous Nations: Genesis 17:1-8 (KJV)

And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect. 2 And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. 3 And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying, 4 As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. 5 Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. 6 And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. 7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. 8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.

Nations Upholding The Bible
The USA derived from England which had a king, and had been taught the Bible since Roman era adventures. The Bible is still honored in our court system as a basis of truth. The USA had many righteous laws and policies up until the Civil War. Racial homogeneity was a premise of law and order. Abraham Lincoln wanted a one-white-race nation. He wanted superior position to belong to his own people, and he instituted a repatriation program for blacks to go to Liberia, but it was neglected after his death.

All Men Are Created Equal

Evidently, that foundation statement was a white and racial, political premise among the white Americans seeking freedom from England, not a biblical analysis of all mankind. God did not create Jacob and Esau equal. George Washington did not think of blacks as equals, much different than treacherous and traitorous, subverted (bribed?) Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist. Many years passed between the Constitution and Lincoln. Lincoln did not think men were politically equal and he didn't think blacks were being fair to the white by becoming so attached to them. If they wanted equality, they had an opportunity to repatriate and form their own black and racial, political government in Liberia. He reprimanded the black men at the repatriation conference for not giving whites a chance to develop the white race.

Lincoln's White Superior Position

"LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: It will be very difficult for an audience so large as this to hear distinctly what a speaker says, and consequently it is important that as profound silence be preserved as possible. "While I was at the hotel to-day, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for us to get along without making either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men. I recollect of but one distinguished instance that I ever heard of so frequently as to be entirely satisfied of its correctness—and that is the case of Judge Douglas's old friend Col. Richard M. Johnson. I will also add to the remarks I have made (for I am not going to enter at large upon this subject), that I have never had the least apprehension that I or my friends would marry negroes if there was no law to keep them from it; but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be in great apprehension that they might, if there were no law to keep them from it, I give him the most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes. I will add one further word, which is this: that I do not understand that there is any place where an alteration of the social and political relations of the negro and the white man can be made except in the State Legislature—not in the Congress of the United States—and as I do not really apprehend the approach of any such thing myself, and as Judge Douglas seems to be in constant horror that some such danger is rapidly approaching, I propose as the best means to prevent it that the Judge be kept at home and placed in the State Legislature to fight the measure. I do not propose dwelling longer at this time on this subject."¹

¹The above excerpt was found at the following link at founding.com: Founders' Library: Fourth Joint Debate: Speeches at Charleston, September 18, 1858

Lincoln's Repatriation Program

The colony of Liberia has been in existence a long time. In a certain sense it is a success. The old President of Liberia, Roberts, has just been with me---the first time I ever saw him. He says they have within the bounds of that colony between 300,000 and 400,000 people, or more than in some of our old States, such as Rhode Island or Delaware, or in some of our newer States, and less than in some of our larger ones. They are not all American colonists, or their descendants. Something less than 12,000 have been sent thither from this country. Many of the original settlers have died, yet, like people elsewhere, their offspring outnumber those deceased.

The question is if the colored people are persuaded to go anywhere, why not there? One reason for an unwillingness to do so is that some of you would rather remain within reach of the country of your nativity. I do not know how much attachment you may have toward our race. It does not strike me that you have the greatest reason to love them. But still you are attached to them at all events.²

²The above excerpt was found at Page 373, Author: Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865. Title: Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 5, P. 370-373. Publication date: 1953 Electronic Form: sponsored by the Abraham Lincoln Association (6-9-2005)

Race And Culture

So, as you can see through the legal courts and history, the USA was founded as a white, Christian country that observed the Bible and homogeneity. The homogeneous people wanted to be among their own kind, and Lincoln suggested (full script) the same for blacks in the nation of Liberia. He reprimanded them for being so attached to the white, and reluctant to go away from whites and help develop a land of their own kind (race and culture) of people.

As you can see today, blacks and many other non-white peoples still have a great wanting and attachment to be among whites. Instead of going and developing countries with people like themselves, they want to be with the white and even take over his government. Mere desire and attachment to be with the white has politically grown as a cancer to the white society and now non-whites want their own government -- even the government of the white -- in the white land, not in a land of their own kind. Self-hating whites have helped them.

Civil War Era
Family lineage, or racial descent was the critical element of determination for the government benefit of possessing real estate and concurring rights "to rule" (government by the people) even after the Civil War had begun. This can be directly deduced through the words of Abraham Lincoln speaking for the favor of and solely -- the American Northern European people -- one race, one people. Recollecting the "ideal union our fathers dreamed", the not-so-mentioned-as-such-today racial homogeneitist, morally justified concerning the particular situation, specifically depicted his vision of America being ruled by only one white race: "... no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks."³

Law And Order: Penalty And Execution Necessary

The USA fell through legislative and judicial treachery. The Federal Reserve Bank was put into place through secret moves. The 50's and 60's brought more treachery, especially with the Kennedy's. Civil rights and non-white immigration was a demise of the USA's former racial and cultural homogeneity, which was in line with natural and biblical reasoning.

Its police force failed to execute the laws it had been obliged by the Constitution to fulfill. Treacherous legislators, judges and attorney generals failed to do their jobs. Anarchy, colorblindness and reverse racism (systematic Affirmative Action racism/genderism) eventually evolved. White sovereignty was polluted and dissolved.

NYC Police Not Allowed To Enforce Law Today

Honorable Racialism

Now you have racism, reverse-racism and honorable racialism. I choose the latter. You must have a sovereign and dominant (subrace) for a nation that reasons with God as Abraham to be a righteous nation. Otherwise, you have enmity and/or anarchy, which exists in our riotous land today. The immigrants with non-biblical backgrounds and non-white status would never have had more rights than a white if we had had decent politicians. We were infiltrated and defrauded of our Constitution. Now, blatant anti-Christians and non-whites have better ability to achieve economic success than a white man, and our falsely taught, deceptive women condone and promote it. God forbid!

Nehemiah's desire to keep Israel's language, race and priesthood homogeneous and undefiled was honorable. His disrespect for the surrounding nations to take part in his government was appropriate. Multiracialism is a demonic counterpart, a product of the Deep State/NWO and corrupt politicians, and wasn't tolerated in ancient Israel nor early America, honorable racialism was. Honorable racialism is practiced in many countries. Multiracialism doesn't stand in China, Japan, North Korea, India and many other nations. China does not allow Somalia to send its citizens and demand equal rights with the Chinese people. Japan doesn't allow North Koreans to demand equal rights in their country and politics, much less invite them to do so. India doesn't allow the USA to send its citizens to demand equal rights in its country. No, honorable racialism is a prerequisite to sustain a nation, and many countries agree de facto or other ways. The faithful woman of Canaan honored racialism.

Republicans or another party must become proactive, not accepting what or the lesser the Democrats offer them. To begin with, they must abolish Affirmative Action. Then, discussions of equality and merit can begin. It will take some effort to turn the racial clock back but it is necessary for survival of the Noahic blessed, white race. Despite white traitors and reprobates, the Bible and honor of God's scattering must have a part of consciousness and political action once again. Restoration of dominant race and superior position for the white is a following proposition. Decent politicians should be on the floor and the president making an executive order to get something started would be appropriate.

Social Problems In The Old World And Modern Day

As the fallen angels and their giant children (wicked men almost two miles in height) ravished the earth in the old world according to the The Book of Enoch, it seems their similar evil spirits are unleashing violence and wickedness throughout the modern world. Our nation is defiled with adultery and fornication. It is polluted with different and adverse subraces and cultures. It is time for recognition of God and reasoning with him, and repentance or else God will send worse things upon the earth.

More details...