After all Gideon had done for Israel, they spiritually fornicated and followed a false covenant (Judges 8:33). Many Christians have been taught the good things of Jesus but have been influenced and deceived by the pre-trib and fornication cult, and are deceiving others through ignorance of the marital terms in the Bible or their erroneous deeds!

A woman must have virginity to offer a husband unless she is a chaste widow, Terry did evidently have that at one time according to her answer to my question below. For some reason, she decided their marriage was not clean and if it was not because of her, then the husband may have not been doing right according to her. They divorced. She could allow that in some cases but she would not be warranted to initiate it.

I am a Christian and encouraged by God to help others develop and prosper through growth in learning God's principles of sanctity. Marriage is an institution based upon the principle of chastity, not fornication or adultery. Female virginity and sexual chastity for marriage has been established since the Old Covenant (Ex. 22:16, Dt. 22:13-21, 28, 29): The once virgin female partner no longer has a justifiable opportunity to have sex with anyone else as long as her first male sex partner is alive--to do so would commit fornication (sexual immorality). She admitted that she had pre-marital sex but didn't mention others than her “husband”. Therefore, if by any chance she did have pre-marital sex with another than her “husband” she should apologize to the man she brought into a legal marriage and divorce because it would not have been an acceptable biblical marriage. Going around and circumventing chastity received a death penalty for the immorality folly in the Old Covenant. See my sermon "Illusion". However, if she was chaste the whole time and faithful, the “husband” did not have a right to divorce her unless he had previous marital obligations.

Abandoned (defiled) or divorced females are required to remain single and sexually abstinent. This now single woman should realize that if she was unchaste she did not have a right to marry the man she later “legally” married and divorced. She is required to live single now and she should take off the ring she is not worthy of wearing. On the other hand, if that was not the case and she was chaste, her “husband” was at the fault, and if he doesn't have marital obligations before he met her, he should try to reconcile. Men have a righteous bias as to being accepted on a return-to-marriage situation, whereas women do not.

Divorced males (from their once virgin or chaste widow) are required to remain single and sexually abstinent also but if her man did not marry a virgin or chaste widow when he married her, he would have had options if he had not taken her virginity.

Let us keep people like this in prayer that God will open up her understanding and she will get inline with what the Bible teaches, amen. Thanks.

At 35 minutes and 20 seconds Terry talks about a woman having been married three different times and she suggests to her being restored to her first husband. The blatant thing of error is the divorced and remarried woman can't be restored to a former husband after sleeping with another man. If her first husband accepted that and let her return, they both would be committing abomination and defiling the land they live on. (Dt. 24:4) At about 36 minutes and 14 seconds she says, “God loves reconciliation.” There was no way that woman of multiple-marriages could have been reconciled with her first husband with God's approval. She was banging other men for 21 years and had the audacity to reach her “first husband” and attempted to get hooked up with him again – horribly unclean. Also, if Terry thinks an unclean woman as such can be reconciled to a former husband, does this indicate that she herself can exclude herself so as to commit immorality and still be married to her “husband” – she says she committed fornication although she hasn't mentioned other men than the “husband”. It makes me wonder because she did not directly reply to my question whether she had known any other men.

At roughly 23 minutes and 30 seconds she mentions that sexual immorality was “unlawful” even for those who were not Jews. However, note below she says, “Giving a man your virginity is not a marriage for Gentiles.” There is a difference between Hebrew betrothal and Gentile engagement, but once a woman gives her virginity to an unmarried and non-obligated man, she has already made the physical deposit for the marriage. All she has to do to finalize it is have it made official. Sometimes this is done with a ceremony.

There is no pre-trib rapture.

Update:

On 7/1/2024 I posted,

“A fornication vow is not a marriage. Miss (the video host), if you did not give your so called husband virginity, you committed fornication with him and he was not biblically married to you. If I remember correctly, you said that you had premarital sex in a video. If that is not correct, notify me.”

Terry quickly replied ( 7/1/2024):

“For the Jews in the Bible, their marriage began at the betrothal making vows of keeping their virginity until the bridegroom came back later to take her to his house and consummate the marriage. Fornication is premarital sex. A Jewish betrothed husband had to divorce his betrothed wife if she fornicated with another man to end the betrothal. Gentiles do not have betrothal divorce as an option since an engagement is not a legal marriage and you can end an engagement for any reason. Once you are married and consummate the marriage, there is no divorce and remarriage. Yes, I fornicated (gave him my virginity) with my husband before marriage, and I repented for it when I got born again at age 45 (19 years ago). Fornication is not marriage, correct. Giving a man your virginity is not a marriage for Gentiles.”