Terry, the host, condones the interviewee's fornication-marriage. This is evil and forsakes purity. The interviewee (Christina) explicitly claimed she had been “promiscuous” and had a child by another man before marrying her husband, which was evidently not a biblical marriage but merely an act of legalized fornication. She may have found God later, but He did not give her physical virginity (a biblical requirement for marriage) again. Her only hope of a biblical marriage was with the first man of her promiscuity, who gave her a physical marital deposit by having sex with her as a virgin. After that the other relationships had no hope of being clean and acceptable to God.

Her legalized-fornication relationship was a fornication-marriage, not a biblical marriage, not established with a covenant that God would accept. Beware of how you choose a covenant. His law (written word) delineates how he accepts marriage, not how the Hagin-ites, Stanley-ites, Copeland-ites, Falwell-ites and other heretics establish their marriages. Christina's fornication-marriage should have been annulled right away. Fornication and adultery are both mentioned as manifest sins, “works of the flesh”, in Galatians 5: 19: “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,”.

After a couple have sex and complete the physical part of the marriage bond (Ex. 22, Dt. 22) but the female is not accepted by the male or vice versa, then, when the female departs and has sex with another man than the first, it is an act of fornication. This is exactly what the interviewee did. Fornication, in this sense, is different than adultery. She would have had to marry her first man and then have sex with another to have committed adultery against him. However, regardless of his own unfinished and suspended circumstances, she did leave him in a condition being unable to reconcile his affair with a virgin (herself at that time).

So, to avoid (I Cor. 7:2) this condemned (Gal. 5:19) predicament, a woman, only with the consent of her father, should marry the first man she sleeps with, whether chosen, seduced or raped (Dt. 22:29) by him. According to the bible, if she doesn't marry him it leaves her in a condition that she can't legitimately marry anyone else. Due to the misdirection of heretics, many of the married women in America, England and the West are deceived by delusion and are really no more clean than a prostitute. Many such women become prostitutes or victims of illegitimate cultural marriages. This seems to be the case with the interviewee; she legally married into fornication and an unclean relationship. Interesting to the subject, Terry (her interviewer) also formerly implied herself as a fornicatress in her video “Christians Committing Adultery- Divorce & Remarriage- Testimony, OSAS, Judgment 4 Left Behind”.

The interviewee had stated previously that she spoke in tongues which she learned at church. This fornication-heretic's testimony proves churches are fallen and promoting fornication-marriage, and other manifestations of sin due to lack of knowledge according to biblical marriage principles. The churches and their members disregard the warning and exhortations of the early church, especially the Apostle Paul. Many of them will promote “revival” recycles decade after decade even when they commit and condone simultaneously their sexual sins.

Not all Old Testament marriages were through betrothal; some were with divorcees (Dt. 24:1-3), which was later reproved by Jesus Christ. Regardless, sex with another man and uncleanness has always been a valid reason for divorce.

What a hypocrite Terry is! What a blind spot as many other unlearned Christians she has! She condemns the concept of adultery, which she does not fully understand and confuses with fornication, but consequently loves and condones fornication (Galatians 5:19). I will stop at about 18 minutes or so: I can't see spending any more time with this video. The problem is the persons involved don't understand that New Testament marriage concept is built upon chastity (female virginity prerequisite) and purity according to biblical law (I Timothy 1:8-11), not fornication and ignorance. A fornicatress can vow, contract, make covenants and all kinds of things but she cannot change the biblical prerequisites for marriage, given to us by the law (our school teacher) and the reproofs of the Lord Jesus Christ, nor can she obtain an acceptable husband, having been approved by God, if she is not chaste and did not marry her first man she slept with. Her best life is destined to live single for God.

When a person goes into a strange house and it is all dirty and bugs all over unwashed dishes, it is a sign there is something not right. It can be the same when a man meets a woman he doesn't know. If the woman's father does not live by Christian purity rule and is not able to guarantee the chastity of his daugher, the supposed potential groom better be very careful. It was an Old Testament protected right so as a man would not be obligated to marry an unclean woman. If she was found to be defiled and unclean, not being able to bleed (prove virginity) at the marriage bed, the man could rightfully divorce her. Christians must learn sanctity.

Notes:

At about 4 minutes, the interviewee said she was "promiscuous". This means she was unchaste when she married and committing fornication! Living in fornication is just as bad as living in remarriage/adultery. Sin is sin, regardless of the form of living in defilement.

@6:20 or so, she gives a “yes” to a man's proposal for marriage after she already had a child with another man: total neglect of the biblical chastity prerequisite for marriage

At 10:36 still no rebuke or reproof? See ya, outta here.

Next day:

@14 to 15 minutes, Terry agrees with interviewee that she is “married”... false! She is living in fornication-marriage as shown at 4 minutes.

The interviewee had stated previously that she spoke in tongues which she learned at church. This testimony proves churches are fallen and promoting fornication-marriage, disregarding the warning and exhortations of the early church, especially Apostle Paul.

@16 min, she gets a divorce. This was righteous whether she knew it or not. She should have never had the fornication-marriage in the first place but she doesn't recognize it as that. Terry, the host, seems to agree with fornication-marriage... what a fool! She does all this talking about divorce and remarriage as a sin in her other videos but doesn't even realize that fornication-marriage is also sin as well.

@18:23 minutes, I can't see spending any more time with this video... the problem is the persons involved don't understand that marriage is built upon chastity and purity, not fornication.

Links:

Divorced Self-Called Fornicatress Joggles Whether She Is Married

Tongues

Illusion

Options after separation from a cultural marriage without biblical founding

Platform for living single

Suicide is never the answer

When divorce is necessary

Beware of the term “covenant marriage”

No Pre-trib Rapture Future Of Israel

No one who claims to be a Jew today has proof of inheritance (Ezra 2:61-63), thus, a Gentile