|
|
JESUS AGREED WITH THE PREVENTION OF ABOMINATION (V. 4) Deuteronomy 24: 3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; 4 her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the Lord: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance. (AKJV) CHASTITY AND TRANSPARENCY The Lord Jesus Christ did not accept a woman who did not have virginity who married a man to be a legitimate wife in Mt. 19. 9. The man who married such a woman could divorce her and marry another woman if he desired and would not be imputed as an adulterer because of the ineligibility of the unchaste woman to be a biblical wife. Chastity and transparency is required in marriage. Jesus referred to the sexual cleanliness of Adam and Eve and those who followed their straight course after reproduction began, “... from the beginning... “. (Mt. 19.8) MARRIAGE REQUIRES PURITY FROM SHARING THE BED UNTIL DEATH MOSES HAD AUTHORITY TO LEAD THE PEOPLE OF GOD Nevertheless, as you see in verses Dt. 24:1-3, Moses, through his redaction of the law, made the book of Deuteronomy (which etymologically means second law), and a different biblical guideline for the Hebrews to follow even up unto the times of Malichi. Jesus particularly referred to this in Mt. 19:8: He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. Divorce was not a practice of the Hebrews as Exodus 22:16 demonstrates. So does even Dt. 22:13-21, 28, 29. Dowry wives could never be divorced. A man could marry many women (polygamy was not an issue) but he could not divorce a dowry wife. As we can notice in the following chapter (Dt. 23: 14), Moses goes into the subject of holiness and the prevention of a matter of uncleanliness: “ervat davar”, which was a righteous thing and the Lord Jesus did not reprove him on this part. Then, Moses continues to Dt. 24: 1-3, this is where the Lord disagreed and reproved him. BIBLE ERA COMPARISON: CHRISTIAN VS MODERN “JEWISH” First Era: Genesis through Numbers The modern “Jewish” are cult proselytes and do not recognize the mandate of God in Nu. 36:5-13. Christians do. The former circumvent and twist/molest the written Scriptures. Defilement will eventually bring great judgment upon the Earth. Second Era: Deuteronomy Through Malachi The modern “Jewish” recognize the second law era remarriage law of Dt. 24:1-3, whereas Christians recognize the New Testament era reproof and rejection of remarriage by the Lord Jesus Christ. The latter hold remarriage as adultery. It seems the NWO and anti-Christian elite have followed the ill sexual effect upon civilization of the modern “Jewish”, and even many Christians have been deceived by not understanding the eras and eschatology as well. Third Era: New Testament The modern “Jewish” do not recognize the Lord Jesus Christ as the future prophet mentioned by Moses in the second law era: Dt. 18:15-19. Therefore, all of their study including the Talmud is in disbelief and not of faith. Some of their studies may seem very beautiful using great tools of language: Hebrew and Aramaic, but if you leave Jesus Christ out of the Bible, you cannot follow God. Remember, the modern Jewish are not the same genetic and genealogical people as the Old Testament Hebrews, and their cultic, Jewish Gentile (Luke 21:24) lack of Hebrew racial values are evident. DT. 24:4 DECLARES A RETURN DIVORCED AND REMARRIED WIFE IS AN ABOMINATION BEFORE THE LORD As you can notice in Dt. 23:14, whether following the holiness of Moses and keeping the camp clean, or following the holiness of Jesus Christ and only accepting a clean woman, who has not been defiled, for a wife in (Mt. 19:9), Christians are expected to keep both the camp and their personal lives clean. Thus, a man could never accept a such a defiled and return wife as a bed partner. It would be an abomination before the Lord. THOU SHALT NOT CAUSE THE LAND TO SIN Such a return marriage of a defiled woman would destroy the community. It would destroy the lives of the children. Many childern reflect the dehabilitating, curse of their erring parent of defilement through uncountable attempts of recovery from drunkenness, eventual body chemistry change with drug and alcohol addiction, and a way of finding temporary peace that does not fulfill. Other manifestations of biblical ignorance and traumatic sin appear. Serial killers and warmongers at one time did not have the desire to kill. Thieves at one time did not have the desire to steal. Bad habits are learned. The sexual defilement psychological and marital destruction effect throws the child from an acceptable life he once knew. Such children with proper guidance may have avoided and never fell into such consequential horrors, perhaps they could have developed into lawyers, scientists or local church officials, but those victims without any good and reliable examples and help are very susceptible to divert from the proper way. Nevertheless, they bear accountability in heaven for their negligence to overcome and make amends, self-afflictions, wrongs to themselves, family and society. The land and community become haunted with guilt of abomination without repentance and separation of the return defiled wife. It seems the perpetrators of defilement many times attempt their adventure of lust and family destruction without regard for others and remorse for their deeds and assault against the institution of God (Ephesians 5:25) They completely ignore that the marriage institution is related to the mystery of Christ and the church. They smite the righteous endeavor of a faithful marriage by taking advantage of the vulnerable and driving their fleshly desire dagger into the lives not only of a parent who needed encouragement but also an innocent family. Their wounds effect several generations and extend unto many people. Misfortunately, the unlearned and perverted of the confused church lack the qualified leadership and moral ability to help or edify the state and the state does not have the biblical and intellectual ability to penalize the perpetrators of defilement. The individual is left alone to the Scriptures for direction. God help us. KING DAVID OF ISRAEL COULD NO LONGER SLEEP WITH HIS DEFILED CONCUBINES King David could not have sex with his defiled concubines (a fulfilled prophecy of Nathan the prophet) after the treachery of Absalom (2 Samuel 12:11, 2 Samuel 16:22); they lived as widows (2 Samuel 20.3). A woman who divorces her husband and remarries to another man becomes an adulteress. She would be a defiled woman even to her second man whether he recognizes it or not. Then, after becoming a remarried woman and no longer chaste, and not being satisfied with her consequent man, if she leaves him also and re-unites with her first man it would be an abomination. DEFILEMENT DESTROYS MARRIAGE If she became defiled by her second man and rejected him, she certainly could not become undefiled by leaving him. She could properly stop a defiled relationship by doing so, but she could never restore her chastity. Her unchastity would be a physical and spiritual disgrace that she would have to live with for the rest of her life. It would be impossible for her to restore her marriage with her first man. Even though she may vainly go through a legal proceeding for marriage or not to be re-united with him, it would constitute an abomination.
DEFILED WOMEN PROPERLY LIVE AS WIDOWS (WITHOUT ANY BED PARTNER) King David could not have sex with his defiled concubines (a fulfilled prophecy of Nathan the prophet) after the treachery of Absalom (2 Samuel 12:11, 2 Samuel 16:22); they lived as widows (2 Samuel 20.3). Links: Greg Laurie Grounds For “Forgiveness” Heresy |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Second Marriages Not Permitted How perverts cause our land to sin! Moses' First Dispensation of the Law Abomination
of defilement Visit our Restoration site. Try our quizzes. Sermons: Illusion Video: Dating And Marriage 101 (67 minutes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|